The use of blood liquid biopsy is being gradually incorporated into the clinical setting of cancer management. The minimally invasive nature of the usage of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and its ability to capture the molecular alterations of tumors are great advantages for their clinical applications. However, somatic mosaicism in plasma remains an immense challenge for accurate interpretation of liquid biopsy results. Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) is part of the normal process of aging with the accumulation of somatic mutations and clonal expansion of hematopoietic stem cells. The detection of these non-tumor derived CH-mutations has been repeatedly reported as a source of biological background noise of blood liquid biopsy. Incorrect classification of CH mutations as tumor-derived mutations could lead to inappropriate therapeutic management. CH has also been associated with an increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease and hematological malignancies. Cancer patients, who are CH carriers, are more prone to develop therapy-related myeloid neoplasms after chemotherapy than non-carriers. The detection of CH mutations from plasma cfDNA analysis should be cautiously evaluated for their potential pathological relevance. Although CH mutations are currently considered as “false-positives” in cfDNA analysis, future studies should evaluate their clinical significance in healthy individuals and cancer patients.

As the use of next‐generation sequencing (NGS) for plasma cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) continues to expand in clinical settings, accurate identification of circulating tumor DNA mutations is important to validate its use in the clinical management for cancer patients. Here, we aimed to characterize mutations including clonal hematopoiesis (CH)‐related mutations in plasma cfDNA and tumor tissues using the same ultradeep NGS assay and evaluate the clinical significance of CH‐related mutations on the interpretation of liquid biopsy results. Ultradeep targeted NGS using Oncomine Pan‐Cancer Panel was performed on matched surgically resected tumor tissues, peripheral blood cells (PBCs), and 120 plasma cfDNA samples from 38 colorectal cancer patients. The clinical significance of the CH‐related mutations in plasma cfDNA was evaluated by longitudinal monitoring of the postoperative plasma samples. Among the 38 patients, 74 nonsynonymous mutations were identified from tumor tissues and 64 mutations from the preoperative plasma samples. Eleven (17%) of the 64 mutations identified in plasma cfDNA were also detected in PBC DNA and were identified to be CH‐related mutations. Overall, 11 of 38 (29%) patients in this cohort harbored at least one CH‐related mutation in plasma cfDNA. These CH‐related mutations were continuously detected in subsequent postoperative plasma samples from three patients which could be misinterpreted as the presence of residual disease or as lack of treatment response. Our results indicated that it is essential to integrate the mutational information of PBCs to differentiate tumor‐derived from CH‐related mutations in liquid biopsy analysis. This would prevent the misinterpretation of results to avoid misinformed clinical management for cancer patients.

Genomic profiling using tumor biopsies remains the standard approach for the selection of approved molecular targeted therapies. However, this is often limited by its invasiveness, feasibility, and poor sample quality. Liquid biopsies provide a less invasive approach while capturing a contemporaneous and comprehensive tumor genomic profile. Recent advancements in the detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from plasma samples at satisfactory sensitivity, specificity, and detection concordance to tumor tissues have facilitated the approval of ctDNA-based genomic profiling to be integrated into regular clinical practice. The recent approval of both single-gene and multigene assays to detect genetic biomarkers from plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) as companion diagnostic tools for molecular targeted therapies has transformed the therapeutic decision-making procedure for advanced solid tumors. Despite the increasing use of cfDNA-based molecular profiling, there is an ongoing debate about a ‘plasma first’ or ‘tissue first’ approach toward genomic testing for advanced solid malignancies. Both approaches present possible advantages and disadvantages, and these factors should be carefully considered to personalize and select the most appropriate genomic assay. This review focuses on the recent advancements of cfDNA-based genomic profiling assays in advanced solid tumors while highlighting the major challenges that should be tackled to formulate evidence-based guidelines in recommending the ‘right assay for the right patient at the right time’.

We present a study to evaluate the feasibility and clinical utility of amplicon‐based Oncomine Pan‐Cancer cell‐free assay to detect circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients with early or advanced breast cancer. In this study, 109 early and metastatic breast cancer patients were recruited before the initiation of treatment. ctDNA mutation profiles were assessed through unique molecular tagging (UMT) and ultradeep next generation sequencing (NGS). For patients with mutations, DNA from corresponding white blood cells (WBC) was sequenced to exclude variants of clonal‐hematopoietic (CH) origin. UMT targeted sequencing from plasma of 109 patients achieved a median total coverage of 55 498X and a median molecular coverage of 4187X. Among 53 ctDNA positive samples, 38% were mutation positive by WBC sequencing, indicating potentially false‐positive results contributed by CH origin. Prevalence of CH‐related mutations was associated with age (P = 7.51 × 10⁻⁴). After exclusion of CH mutations, ctDNA detection rates were 37% for local or locally advanced breast cancer (stage I‐III) and 81% for metastatic or recurrent breast cancer. The ctDNA detection rate correlated with disease stage (P = 2.60 × 10⁻⁴), nodal spread (P = 6.49 × 10⁻³) and the status of distant metastases (P = 5.00 × 10⁻⁴). ctDNA variants were detected mostly in TP53, PIK3CA and AKT1 genes, with variants showing therapeutic relevance. This pilot study endorses the use of targeted NGS for non‐invasive molecular profiling of breast cancer. Paired sequencing of plasma ctDNA and WBC should be implemented to improve accurate interpretation of liquid biopsy.

Cancer pharmacogenomics is the science concerned with understanding genetic alterations and its effects on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anti-cancer drugs, with the aim to provide cancer patients with the precise medication that will achieve a good response and cause low/no incidence of adverse events. Advances in biotechnology and bioinformatics have enabled genomic research to evolve from the evaluation of alterations at the single-gene level to studies on the whole-genome scale using large-scale genotyping and next generation sequencing techniques. International collaborative efforts have resulted in the construction of databases to curate the identified genetic alterations that are clinically significant, and these are currently utilized in clinical sequencing and liquid biopsy screening/monitoring. Furthermore, countless clinical studies have accumulated sufficient evidence to match cancer patients to therapies by utilizing the information of clinical-relevant alterations. In this review we summarize the importance of germline alterations that act as predictive biomarkers for drug-induced toxicity and drug response as well as somatic mutations in cancer cells that function as drug targets. The integration of genomics into the medical field has transformed the era of cancer therapy from one-size-fits-all to cancer precision medicine.

Background: Existing circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) assays are primarily centralized, requiring specialized sample handling and transportation. Implementing a flexible, decentralized sequencing system at point of care, with minimal technical oversight, can enhance turnaround times and patient access to genomic profiling. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical feasibility of an automated and decentralized cfDNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay for identifying actionable alterations in advanced solid tumors. Methods: Genomic profiling of plasma cfDNA from 298 patients with advanced solid tumors was conducted using an automated NGS assay. We assessed concordance of tumor mutations detected in plasma cfDNA and patient-matched tumor tissues analyzed by an FDA-approved assay, investigating clinical factors influencing circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) aberration (mut-ctDNA) detection sensitivity. Results: Sequencing success rates for cfDNA genomic profiling was significantly higher than archived tumor tissue (99% vs 96%). Mut-ctDNA detection rates ranged from 20% to 67% across different solid tumors. Targetable or resistance alterations were found in 18% of the patients. About 72% of the patients showed concordant alterations from tissue and plasma. The level of concordance was associated with the cancer type, tumor burden, and metastatic location. Notably, 63 plasma-only alterations were identified in 18% of patients and were more frequently observed in those with prior targeted treatments (24%) compared to chemotherapy (10%). Conclusions: This study underscores the clinical feasibility of an automated, decentralized cfDNA genomic profiling approach. It emphasizes the importance of considering confounding clinical factors when selecting plasma- or tissue-based profiling assay. Such an approach holds promise for enhancing patient access to timely genomic profiling and targeted therapy selection.