Brian Telfer

Dr. Brian Telfer

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

35Years (1992-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FCFrancesca Cersosimo
Francesca Cersosimo
SLSilvia Lonardi
Silvia Lonardi
GBGiulia Bernardini
Giulia Bernardini
BTBrian Telfer
Brian Telfer
Giulio MandelliGiulio Mandelli
Giulio Mandelli
Emanuele GiurisatoEmanuele Giurisato
Emanuele Giurisato
Osteosarcomas (OSs) are bone tumors most commonly found in pediatric and adolescent patients characterized by high risk of metastatic progression and recurrence after therapy. Effective therapeutic management of this disease still remains elusive as evidenced by poor patient survival rates. To achieve a more effective therapeutic management regimen, and hence patient survival, there is a need to identify more focused targeted therapies for OSs treatment in the clinical setting. The role of the OS tumor stroma microenvironment plays a significant part in the development and dissemination of this disease. Important components, and hence potential targets for treatment, are the tumor-infiltrating macrophages that are known to orchestrate many aspects of OS stromal signaling and disease progression. In particular, increased infiltration of M2-like tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) has been associated with OS metastasis and poor patient prognosis despite currently used aggressive therapies regimens. This review aims to provide a summary update of current macrophage-centered knowledge and to discuss the possible roles that macrophages play in the process of OS metastasis development focusing on the potential influence of stromal cross-talk signaling between TAMs, cancer-stem cells and additional OSs tumoral microenvironment factors.

5 January 2010 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MFMelissa K. Friswell
Melissa K. Friswell
HGHelen Gika
Helen Gika
ISIan Stratford
Ian Stratford
GTGeorgios Theodoridis
Georgios Theodoridis
BTBrian Telfer
Brian Telfer
AMAndrew J McBain
Andrew J McBain
The gastrointestinal tract microbiota (GTM) of mammals is a complex microbial consortium, the composition and activities of which influences mucosal development, immunity, nutrition and drug metabolism. It remains unclear whether the composition of the dominant GTM is conserved within animals of the same strain and whether stable GTMs are selected for by host-specific factors or dictated by environmental variables. The GTM composition of six highly inbred, genetically distinct strains of mouse (C3H, C57, GFEC, CD1, CBA nu/nu and SCID) was profiled using eubacterial –specific PCR-DGGE and quantitative PCR of feces. Animals exhibited strain-specific fecal eubacterial profiles that were highly stable (c. >95% concordance over 26 months for C57). Analyses of mice that had been relocated before and after maturity indicated marked, reproducible changes in fecal consortia and that occurred only in young animals. Implantation of a female BDF1 mouse with genetically distinct (C57 and Agoutie) embryos produced highly similar GTM profiles (c. 95% concordance) between mother and offspring, regardless of offspring strain, which was also reflected in urinary metabolite profiles. Marked institution-specific GTM profiles were apparent in C3H mice raised in two different research institutions. Strain-specific data were suggestive of genetic determination of the composition and activities of intestinal symbiotic consortia. However, relocation studies and uterine implantation demonstrated the dominance of environmental influences on the GTM. This was manifested in large variations between isogenic adult mice reared in different research institutions.

1 October 2011 in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JSJoana M. Senra
Joana M. Senra
BTBrian Telfer
Brian Telfer
KCKim E. Cherry
Kim E. Cherry
CMCian M. McCrudden
Cian M. McCrudden
DHDavid G. Hirst
David G. Hirst
ISIan Stratford
Ian Stratford
PARP-1 is a critical enzyme in the repair of DNA strand breaks. Inhibition of PARP-1 increases the effectiveness of radiation in killing tumor cells. However, although the mechanism(s) are well understood for these radiosensitizing effects in vitro, the underlying mechanism(s) in vivo are less clear. Nicotinamide, a drug structurally related to the first generation PARP-1 inhibitor, 3-aminobenzamide, reduces tumor hypoxia by preventing transient cessations in tumor blood flow, thus improving tumor oxygenation and sensitivity to radiotherapy. Here, we investigate whether olaparib, a potent PARP-1 inhibitor, enhances radiotherapy, not only by inhibiting DNA repair but also by changing tumor vascular hemodynamics in non–small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). In irradiated Calu-6 and A549 cells, olaparib enhanced the cytotoxic effects of radiation (sensitizer enhancement ratio at 10% survival = 1.5 and 1.3) and DNA double-strand breaks persisted for at least 24 hours after treatment. Combination treatment of Calu-6 xenografts with olaparib and fractionated radiotherapy caused significant tumor regression (P = 0.007) relative to radiotherapy alone. To determine whether this radiosensitization was solely due to effects on DNA repair, we used a dorsal window chamber model to establish the drug/radiation effects on vessel dynamics. Olaparib alone, when given as single or multiple daily doses, or in combination with fractionated radiotherapy, increased the perfusion of tumor blood vessels. Furthermore, an ex vivo assay in phenylephrine preconstricted arteries confirmed olaparib to have higher vasodilatory properties than nicotinamide. This study suggests that olaparib warrants consideration for further development in combination with radiotherapy in clinical oncology settings such as NSCLC. Mol Cancer Ther; 10(10); 1949–58. ©2011 AACR.

24 May 2012 in Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RGRoben G. Gieling
Roben G. Gieling
MBMuhammad Babur
Muhammad Babur
LMLupti Mamnani
Lupti Mamnani
NBNatalie Burrows
Natalie Burrows
BTBrian Telfer
Brian Telfer
KWKaye J. Williams
Kaye J. Williams

1 October 1997 in Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RRRaquel F. Reinoso
Raquel F. Reinoso
BTBrian Telfer
Brian Telfer
MRMalcolm Rowland
Malcolm Rowland

15 December 2004 in Clinical Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KWKaye J. (Kaye Williams
Kaye J. (Kaye Williams
BTBrian Telfer
Brian Telfer
SBSandra Brave
Sandra Brave
JKJane Kendrew
Jane Kendrew
LWLynsey Whittaker
Lynsey Whittaker
SWStephen R. Wedge
Stephen R. Wedge
Purpose: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays a key role in tumor angiogenesis and acts as a radiation survival factor for endothelial cells. ZD6474 (N-(4-bromo-2-fluorophenyl)-6-methoxy-7-[(1-methylpiperidin-4-yl)methoxy]quinazolin-4-amine) is a potent VEGF receptor 2 (KDR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that has additional activity versus the epidermal growth factor receptor. This study was designed to determine the efficacy of combining ZD6474 and radiotherapy in vivo. Experimental Design: The Calu-6 (non–small-cell lung cancer) tumor model was selected because it was found to be unresponsive to treatment with a selective epidermal growth factor receptor TKI but responds significantly to treatment with selective VEGF receptor TKIs. Tumor-bearing mice received either vehicle or ZD6474 (50 mg/kg, by mouth, once daily) for the duration of the experiment, with or without radiotherapy (3 × 2 Gy, days 1–3). Two combination schedules were examined: (a) ZD6474 given before each dose of radiation (concurrent schedule); and (b) ZD6474 given 30 minutes after the last dose of radiotherapy (sequential schedule). Results: The growth delay induced using the concurrent schedule was greater than that induced by ZD6474 or radiation treatment alone (22 ± 1 versus 9 ± 1 and 17 ± 2 days, respectively; P = 0.03 versus radiation alone). When administered sequentially, the growth delay was markedly enhanced (36 ± 1 days; P < 0.001 versus radiation alone or the concurrent schedule). Intravenous administration of Hoechst 33342 showed a trend toward reduced tumor perfusion after ZD6474 treatment, and a pairwise comparison (versus control) was significant after three doses of ZD6474 (P = 0.05 by one-tailed t test). Thus, impaired reoxygenation between fractions in the concurrent protocol may be the causal basis for the schedule dependency of the radiopotentiation observed. Conclusions: ZD6474 may be a successful adjuvant to clinical radiotherapy, and scheduling of the treatments could be important to ensure optimal efficacy.