Eiji Hishinuma

Dr. Eiji Hishinuma

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2021 in Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DSDaisuke Saigusa
Daisuke Saigusa
NMNaomi Matsukawa
Naomi Matsukawa
EHEiji Hishinuma
Eiji Hishinuma
SKSeizo Koshiba
Seizo Koshiba
Metabolomics has been widely used for investigating the biological functions of disease expression and has the potential to discover biomarkers in circulating biofluids or tissue extracts that reflect in phenotypic changes. Metabolic profiling has advantages because of the use of unbiased techniques, including multivariate analysis, and has been applied in pharmacological studies to predict therapeutic and adverse reactions of drugs, which is called pharmacometabolomics (PMx). Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)- and mass spectrometry (MS)-based metabolomics has contributed to the discovery of recent disease biomarkers; however, the optimal strategy for the study purpose must be selected from many established protocols, methodologies and analytical platforms. Additionally, information on molecular localization in tissue is essential for further functional analyses related to therapeutic and adverse effects of drugs in the process of drug development. MS imaging (MSI) is a promising technology that can visualize molecules on tissue surfaces without labeling and thus provide localized information. This review summarizes recent uses of MS-based global and wide-targeted metabolomics technologies and the advantages of the MSI approach for PMx and highlights the PMx technique for the biomarker discovery of adverse drug effects.

1 August 2018 in Drug Metabolism and Disposition
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EHEiji Hishinuma
Eiji Hishinuma
YNYoko Narita
Yoko Narita
SSSakae Saito
Sakae Saito
MMMasamitsu Maekawa
Masamitsu Maekawa
FAFumika Akai
Fumika Akai
Masahiro HiratsukaMasahiro Hiratsuka
Masahiro Hiratsuka
Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD, EC 1.3.1.2), encoded by the DPYD gene, is the rate-limiting enzyme in the degradation pathway of endogenous pyrimidine and fluoropyrimidine drugs such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). DPD catalyzes the reduction of uracil, thymine, and 5-FU. In Caucasians, DPYD mutations, including DPYD*2A, DPYD*13, c.2846A>T, and 1129-5923C>G/hapB3, are known to contribute to interindividual variations in the toxicity of 5-FU. However, none of these DPYD polymorphisms have been identified in the Asian population. Recently, 21 DPYD allelic variants, including some novel-single nucleotide variants (SNVs), were identified in 1,070 healthy Japanese individuals by analyzing their whole-genome sequences (WGS), but the functional alterations caused by these variants remain unknown. In this study, in vitro analysis was performed on 22 DPD allelic variants by transiently expressing wild-type DPD and 21 DPD variants in 293FT cells and characterizing their enzymatic activities, using 5-FU as a substrate. DPD expression levels and dimeric forms were determined using immunoblotting and blue native-PAGE, respectively. Additionally, the values of three kinetic parameters, the Michaelis constant (Km), maximum velocity (Vmax), and intrinsic clearance (CLint = Vmax/Km), were determined for the reduction of 5-FU. We found that 10 variants exhibited significantly decreased intrinsic clearance in comparison to wild-type DPD. Moreover, the band patterns observed in the immunoblots of blue native gels indicated that DPD dimerization is required for enzymatic activity in DPD. Thus, the detection of rare DPYD variants might facilitate severe adverse effect prediction of 5-FU-based chemotherapy in the Japanese population.

30 June 2021 in Toxins
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EHEiji Hishinuma
Eiji Hishinuma
MSMuneaki Shimada
Muneaki Shimada
NMNaomi Matsukawa
Naomi Matsukawa
DSDaisuke Saigusa
Daisuke Saigusa
BLBin Li
Bin Li
NYNobuo Yaegashi
Nobuo Yaegashi
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a fatal gynecologic cancer, and its poor prognosis is mainly due to delayed diagnosis. Therefore, biomarker identification and prognosis prediction are crucial in EOC. Altered cell metabolism is a characteristic feature of cancers, and metabolomics reflects an individual’s current phenotype. In particular, plasma metabolome analyses can be useful for biomarker identification. In this study, we analyzed 624 metabolites, including uremic toxins (UTx) in plasma derived from 80 patients with EOC using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS). Compared with the healthy control, we detected 77 significantly increased metabolites and 114 significantly decreased metabolites in EOC patients. Especially, decreased concentrations of lysophosphatidylcholines and phosphatidylcholines and increased concentrations of triglycerides were observed, indicating a metabolic profile characteristic of EOC patients. After calculating the parameters of each metabolic index, we found that higher ratios of kynurenine to tryptophan correlates with worse prognosis in EOC patients. Kynurenine, one of the UTx, can affect the prognosis of EOC. Our results demonstrated that plasma metabolome analysis is useful not only for the diagnosis of EOC, but also for predicting prognosis with the variation of UTx and evaluating response to chemotherapy.

24 September 2021 in Metabolites
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DSDaisuke Saigusa
Daisuke Saigusa
EHEiji Hishinuma
Eiji Hishinuma
NMNaomi Matsukawa
Naomi Matsukawa
MTMasatomo Takahashi
Masatomo Takahashi
JIJin Inoue
Jin Inoue
MYMasayuki Yamamoto
Masayuki Yamamoto
Metabolic profiling is an omics approach that can be used to observe phenotypic changes, making it particularly attractive for biomarker discovery. Although several candidate metabolites biomarkers for disease expression have been identified in recent clinical studies, the reference values of healthy subjects have not been established. In particular, the accuracy of concentrations measured by mass spectrometry (MS) is unclear. Therefore, comprehensive metabolic profiling in large-scale cohorts by MS to create a database with reference ranges is essential for evaluating the quality of the discovered biomarkers. In this study, we tested 8700 plasma samples by commercial kit-based metabolomics and separated them into two groups of 6159 and 2541 analyses based on the different ultra-high-performance tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) systems. We evaluated the quality of the quantified values of the detected metabolites from the reference materials in the group of 2541 compared with the quantified values from other platforms, such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), supercritical fluid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (SFC-MS/MS) and UHPLC-Fourier transform mass spectrometry (FTMS). The values of the amino acids were highly correlated with the NMR results, and lipid species such as phosphatidylcholines and ceramides showed good correlation, while the values of triglycerides and cholesterol esters correlated less to the lipidomics analyses performed using SFC-MS/MS and UHPLC-FTMS. The evaluation of the quantified values by MS-based techniques is essential for metabolic profiling in a large-scale cohort.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EHEiji Hishinuma
Eiji Hishinuma
EREvelyn Gutiérrez Rico
Evelyn Gutiérrez Rico
Masahiro HiratsukaMasahiro Hiratsuka
Masahiro Hiratsuka
Fluoropyrimidine drugs (FPs), including 5-fluorouracil, tegafur, capecitabine, and doxifluridine, are among the most widely used anticancer agents in the treatment of solid tumors. However, severe toxicity occurs in approximately 30% of patients following FP administration, emphasizing the importance of predicting the risk of acute toxicity before treatment. Three metabolic enzymes, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), dihydropyrimidinase (DHP), and β-ureidopropionase (β-UP), degrade FPs; hence, deficiencies in these enzymes, arising from genetic polymorphisms, are involved in severe FP-related toxicity, although the effect of these polymorphisms on in vivo enzymatic activity has not been clarified. Furthermore, the clinical usefulness of current methods for predicting in vivo activity, such as pyrimidine concentrations in blood or urine, is unknown. In vitro tests have been established as advantageous for predicting the in vivo activity of enzyme variants. This is due to several studies that evaluated FP activities after enzyme metabolism using transient expression systems in Escherichia coli or mammalian cells; however, there are no comparative reports of these results. Thus, in this review, we summarized the results of in vitro analyses involving DPD, DHP, and β-UP in an attempt to encourage further comparative studies using these drug types and to aid in the elucidation of their underlying mechanisms.

1 February 2022 in Metabolites
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SNShin Nishiumi
Shin Nishiumi
YIYoshihiro Izumi
Yoshihiro Izumi
Akiyoshi HirayamaAkiyoshi Hirayama
Akiyoshi Hirayama
MTMasatomo Takahashi
Masatomo Takahashi
MNMotonao Nakao
Motonao Nakao
TBTAKESHI BAMBA
TAKESHI BAMBA
In mass spectrometry-based metabolomics, the differences in the analytical results from different laboratories/machines are an issue to be considered because various types of machines are used in each laboratory. Moreover, the analytical methods are unique to each laboratory. It is important to understand the reality of inter-laboratory differences in metabolomics. Therefore, we have evaluated whether the differences in analytical methods, with the exception sample pretreatment and including metabolite extraction, are involved in the inter-laboratory differences or not. In this study, nine facilities are evaluated for inter-laboratory comparisons of metabolomic analysis. Identical dried samples prepared from human and mouse plasma are distributed to each laboratory, and the metabolites are measured without the pretreatment that is unique to each laboratory. In these measurements, hydrophilic and hydrophobic metabolites are analyzed using 11 and 7 analytical methods, respectively. The metabolomic data acquired at each laboratory are integrated, and the differences in the metabolomic data from the laboratories are evaluated. No substantial difference in the relative quantitative data (human/mouse) for a little less than 50% of the detected metabolites is observed, and the hydrophilic metabolites have fewer differences between the laboratories compared with hydrophobic metabolites. From evaluating selected quantitatively guaranteed metabolites, the proportion of metabolites without the inter-laboratory differences is observed to be slightly high. It is difficult to resolve the inter-laboratory differences in metabolomics because all laboratories cannot prepare the same analytical environments. However, the results from this study indicate that the inter-laboratory differences in metabolomic data are due to measurement and data analysis rather than sample preparation, which will facilitate the understanding of the problems in metabolomics studies involving multiple laboratories.