Ramona Erber

Dr. Ramona Erber

Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2019 in American Journal of Surgical Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FHFlorian Haller
Florian Haller
ASAlena Skálová
Alena Skálová
SIStephan Ihrler
Stephan Ihrler
BMBruno Märkl
Bruno Märkl
MBMatthias Bieg
Matthias Bieg
AAAbbas Agaimy
Abbas Agaimy
Recently, we discovered the recurrent genomic rearrangement [t(4;9)(q13;q31)] enabling upregulation of the transcription factor Nuclear Receptor Subfamily 4 Group A Member 3 (NR4A3) through enhancer hijacking as the oncogenic driver event in acinic cell carcinoma (AciCC) of the salivary glands. In the current study, we evaluated the usefulness of NR4A3 immunostaining and NR4A3 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in the differential diagnosis of AciCC, comparing a total of 64 AciCCs including 17% cases with high-grade transformation, 29 secretory (mammary analog) carcinomas (MASC), and 70 other salivary gland carcinomas. Nuclear NR4A3 immunostaining was a highly specific (100%) and sensitive (98%) marker for AciCC with only 1 negative case, whereas NR4A3 FISH was less sensitive (84%). None of the MASCs or other salivary gland carcinomas displayed any nuclear NR4A3 immunostaining. The recently described HTN3-MSANTD3 gene fusion was observed in 4 of 49 (8%) evaluable AciCCs, all with nuclear NR4A3 immunostaining. In summary, NR4A3 immunostaining is a highly specific and sensitive marker for AciCC, which may be especially valuable in cases with high-grade transformation and in “zymogen granule”-poor examples within the differential diagnostic spectrum of AciCC and MASC.

29 October 2018 in BMC Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PGPaul Gass
Paul Gass
MLMichael Patrick Lux
Michael Patrick Lux
CRClaudia Rauh
Claudia Rauh
AHAlexander Hein
Alexander Hein
MBMayada R. Bani
Mayada R. Bani
MWMarius Wunderle
Marius Wunderle
It has been reported that pathological complete response is an important surrogate marker for disease-free survival and overall survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. This study investigates predictors of the response to neoadjuvant platinum-based or anthracycline-based treatment, and of the prognosis, in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. A total of 121 patients with triple-negative breast cancer received neoadjuvant treatment with either platinum or anthracycline between 2008 and 2013. Pathological complete response was assessed relative to different treatments using logistic regression models with age, clinical tumor stage, grading, and Ki-67 as predictors and interaction terms, to obtain adjusted and subgroup-specific results. The impact of the pathological complete response rate on disease-free survival and overall survival was also analyzed. The pathological complete response rate was higher after platinum/taxane treatment compared with anthracycline/taxane (50.0% vs. 41.8%), but this was not significant in the adjusted analysis (OR 1.44; 95% CI, 0.68 to 3.09). A high histological grade (G3) was a predictor for higher pathological complete response in platinum-based therapy (OR 2.27; 95% CI, 1.00 to 5.30). The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on pathological complete response was significantly different for G1–2 vs. G3 (Pinteraction = 0.013), and additional subgroup-specific differences were noted. Pathological complete response was a predictor for improved disease-free survival and overall survival in both treatment groups, with and without platinum chemotherapy. This retrospective study of patients with triple-negative breast cancer adds to the evidence that the treatment effect of platinum may be greatest particularly in G3 tumors. In addition, the effect of pathological complete response on the prognosis does not depend on the treatment used.

6 October 2020 in Breast Care
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RERamona Erber
Ramona Erber
AHArndt Hartmann
Arndt Hartmann
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have changed therapy strategies for cancer patients tremendously. Some approved ICI acquire testing of PD-L1 expression on tumor and/or immune cells. However, since PD-L1 testing is a comprehensive issue with various assays, antibody clones, scoring methods, and cut-offs, we aimed to summarize the recommendations and technical and histopathological issues of diagnostic PD-L1 assessment with an emphasis on invasive breast cancer (IBC). Summary: Besides other (pre)analytical considerations, selecting the most adequate PD-L1 immunohistochemical assay/antibody clone is important. In-house assay validation, prediagnostic training, and internal and external quality assurance should be implemented. The current most relevant PD-L1 assays and scores will be explained in this review. Moreover, recommendations for PD-L1 testing in IBC are outlined. Key Messages: Atezolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel therapy is approved for adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC), if the tumor-associated immune cells express PD-L1. – This PD-L1 immune cell positivity is defined as an immune cell (IC) score, which refers to the area occupied by PD-L1 positive immune cells (lymphocytes, dendritic cells, macrophages, and granulocytes) as a percentage of the whole tumor area. The cut-off is an IC score ≥1%. In the approval study for atezolizumab in mTNBC, IC score was assessed using the Ventana PD-L1 SP142 assay. Other assays or laboratory developed tests may be used depending on country-specific drug approvals. However, harmonization studies have to show whether other PD-L1 tests are reliable and of clinical value to predict the response of breast cancer patients to ICI.

3 May 2018 in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MWMarius Wunderle
Marius Wunderle
PGPaul Gass
Paul Gass
LHLothar Häberle
Lothar Häberle
VFVivien M. Flesch
Vivien M. Flesch
CRClaudia Rauh
Claudia Rauh
AHAlexander Hein
Alexander Hein

18 June 2020 in British Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FMFilipe Correia Martins
Filipe Correia Martins
DCDominique-Laurent Couturier
Dominique-Laurent Couturier
APAnna Paterson
Anna Paterson
AKAnthony N. Karnezis
Anthony N. Karnezis
CCChristine Chow
Christine Chow
JBJames D. Brenton
James D. Brenton
Background: PTEN loss is a putative driver in histotypes of ovarian cancer (high-grade serous (HGSOC), endometrioid (ENOC), clear cell (CCOC), mucinous (MOC), low-grade serous (LGSOC)). We aimed to characterise PTEN expression as a biomarker in epithelial ovarian cancer in a large population-based study. Methods: Tumours from 5400 patients from a multicentre observational, prospective cohort study of the Ovarian Tumour Tissue Analysis Consortium were used to evaluate associations between immunohistochemical PTEN patterns and overall survival time, age, stage, grade, residual tumour, CD8+ tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) counts, expression of oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and androgen receptor (AR) by means of Cox proportional hazard models and generalised Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel tests. Results: Downregulation of cytoplasmic PTEN expression was most frequent in ENOC (most frequently in younger patients; p value = 0.0001) and CCOC and was associated with longer overall survival in HGSOC (hazard ratio: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.65–0.94, p value = 0.022). PTEN expression was associated with ER, PR and AR expression (p values: 0.0008, 0.062 and 0.0002, respectively) in HGSOC and with lower CD8 counts in CCOC (p value < 0.0001). Heterogeneous expression of PTEN was more prevalent in advanced HGSOC (p value = 0.019) and associated with higher CD8 counts (p value = 0.0016). Conclusions: PTEN loss is a frequent driver in ovarian carcinoma associating distinctly with expression of hormonal receptors and CD8+ TIL counts in HGSOC and CCOC histotypes.

13 January 2018 in Virchows Archiv
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LSLisa Siegler
Lisa Siegler
RERamona Erber
Ramona Erber
SBStefanie Burghaus
Stefanie Burghaus
TBTobias Brodkorb
Tobias Brodkorb
DWDavid Wachter
David Wachter
Abbas AgaimyAbbas Agaimy
Abbas Agaimy