Robert Smith

Dr. Robert Smith


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2019 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JTJ-Donald Tournier
J-Donald Tournier
RSRobert Smith
Robert Smith
DRDavid Raffelt
David Raffelt
RTRami Tabbara
Rami Tabbara
TDThijs Dhollander
Thijs Dhollander
ACAlan Connelly
Alan Connelly

1 September 2012 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RSRobert Smith
Robert Smith
JTJacques-Donald Tournier
Jacques-Donald Tournier
FCFernando Calamante
Fernando Calamante
ACAlan Connelly
Alan Connelly

1 October 2015 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RSRobert Smith
Robert Smith
JTJacques-Donald Tournier
Jacques-Donald Tournier
FCFernando Calamante
Fernando Calamante
ACAlan Connelly
Alan Connelly

1 February 2013 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RSRobert Smith
Robert Smith
JTJacques-Donald Tournier
Jacques-Donald Tournier
FCFernando Calamante
Fernando Calamante
ACAlan Connelly
Alan Connelly

1 January 2017 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DRDavid A. Raffelt
David A. Raffelt
JTJ.-Donald Tournier
J.-Donald Tournier
RSRobert Smith
Robert Smith
DVDavid N. Vaughan
David N. Vaughan
GJGraeme Jackson
Graeme Jackson
ACAlan Connelly
Alan Connelly
Voxel-based analysis of diffusion MRI data is increasingly popular. However, most white matter voxels contain contributions from multiple fibre populations (often referred to as crossing fibres), and therefore voxel-averaged quantitative measures (e.g. fractional anisotropy) are not fibre-specific and have poor interpretability. Using higher-order diffusion models, parameters related to fibre density can be extracted for individual fibre populations within each voxel ('fixels'), and recent advances in statistics enable the multi-subject analysis of such data. However, investigating within-voxel microscopic fibre density alone does not account for macroscopic differences in the white matter morphology (e.g. the calibre of a fibre bundle). In this work, we introduce a novel method to investigate the latter, which we call fixel-based morphometry (FBM). To obtain a more complete measure related to the total number of white matter axons, information from both within-voxel microscopic fibre density and macroscopic morphology must be combined. We therefore present the FBM method as an integral piece within a comprehensive fixel-based analysis framework to investigate measures of fibre density, fibre-bundle morphology (cross-section), and a combined measure of fibre density and cross-section. We performed simulations to demonstrate the proposed measures using various transformations of a numerical fibre bundle phantom. Finally, we provide an example of such an analysis by comparing a clinical patient group to a healthy control group, which demonstrates that all three measures provide distinct and complementary information. By capturing information from both sources, the combined fibre density and cross-section measure is likely to be more sensitive to certain pathologies and more directly interpretable.

1 August 2015 in NeuroImage
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DRDavid A. Raffelt
David A. Raffelt
RSRobert Smith
Robert Smith
GRGerard R. Ridgway
Gerard R. Ridgway
JTJ-Donald Tournier
J-Donald Tournier
DVDavid N. Vaughan
David N. Vaughan
ACAlan Connelly
Alan Connelly
In brain regions containing crossing fibre bundles, voxel-average diffusion MRI measures such as fractional anisotropy (FA) are difficult to interpret, and lack within-voxel single fibre population specificity. Recent work has focused on the development of more interpretable quantitative measures that can be associated with a specific fibre population within a voxel containing crossing fibres (herein we use fixel to refer to a specific fibre population within a single voxel). Unfortunately, traditional 3D methods for smoothing and cluster-based statistical inference cannot be used for voxel-based analysis of these measures, since the local neighbourhood for smoothing and cluster formation can be ambiguous when adjacent voxels may have different numbers of fixels, or ill-defined when they belong to different tracts. Here we introduce a novel statistical method to perform whole-brain fixel-based analysis called connectivity-based fixel enhancement (CFE). CFE uses probabilistic tractography to identify structurally connected fixels that are likely to share underlying anatomy and pathology. Probabilistic connectivity information is then used for tract-specific smoothing (prior to the statistical analysis) and enhancement of the statistical map (using a threshold-free cluster enhancement-like approach). To investigate the characteristics of the CFE method, we assessed sensitivity and specificity using a large number of combinations of CFE enhancement parameters and smoothing extents, using simulated pathology generated with a range of test-statistic signal-to-noise ratios in five different white matter regions (chosen to cover a broad range of fibre bundle features). The results suggest that CFE input parameters are relatively insensitive to the characteristics of the simulated pathology. We therefore recommend a single set of CFE parameters that should give near optimal results in future studies where the group effect is unknown. We then demonstrate the proposed method by comparing apparent fibre density between motor neurone disease (MND) patients with control subjects. The MND results illustrate the benefit of fixel-specific statistical inference in white matter regions that contain crossing fibres.