High-throughput sequencing for transcript profiling in plants has revealed that alternative splicing (AS) affects a much higher proportion of the transcriptome than was previously assumed. AS is involved in most plant processes and is particularly prevalent in plants exposed to environmental stress. The identification of mutations in predicted splicing factors and spliceosomal proteins that affect cell fate, the circadian clock, plant defense, and tolerance/sensitivity to abiotic stress all point to a fundamental role of splicing/AS in plant growth, development, and responses to external cues. Splicing factors affect the AS of multiple downstream target genes, thereby transferring signals to alter gene expression via splicing factor/AS networks. The last two to three years have seen an ever-increasing number of examples of functional AS. At a time when the identification of AS in individual genes and at a global level is exploding, this review aims to bring together such examples to illustrate the extent and importance of AS, which are not always obvious from individual publications. It also aims to ensure that plant scientists are aware that AS is likely to occur in the genes that they study and that dynamic changes in AS and its consequences need to be considered routinely.

Plants precisely time the onset of flowering to ensure reproductive success. A major factor in seasonal control of flowering time is the photoperiod. The length of the daily light period is measured by the circadian clock in leaves, and a signal is conveyed to the shoot apex to initiate floral transition accordingly. In the last two decades, the molecular players in the photoperiodic pathway have been identified in Arabidopsis thaliana. Moreover, the intricate connections between the circadian clockwork and components of the photoperiodic pathway have been unravelled. In particular, the molecular basis of time-of-day-dependent sensitivity to floral stimuli, as predicted by Bünning and Pittendrigh, has been elucidated. This review covers recent insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying clock regulation of photoperiodic responses and the integration of the photoperiodic pathway into the flowering time network in Arabidopsis. Furthermore, examples of conservation and divergence in photoperiodic flower induction in other plant species are discussed.

The endogenous clock that drives circadian rhythms is thought to communicate temporal information within the cell via cycling downstream transcripts. A transcript encoding a glycine-rich RNA-binding protein, Atgrp7 , in Arabidopsis thaliana undergoes circadian oscillations with peak levels in the evening. The At GRP7 protein also cycles with a time delay so that Atgrp7 transcript levels decline when the At GRP7 protein accumulates to high levels. After At GRP7 protein concentration has fallen to trough levels, Atgrp7 transcript starts to reaccumulate. Overexpression of At GRP7 in transgenic Arabidopsis plants severely depresses cycling of the endogenous Atgrp7 transcript. These data establish both transcript and protein as components of a negative feedback circuit capable of generating a stable oscillation. At GRP7 overexpression also depresses the oscillation of the circadian-regulated transcript encoding the related RNA-binding protein At GRP8 but does not affect the oscillation of transcripts such as cab or catalase mRNAs. We propose that the At GRP7 autoregulatory loop represents a “slave” oscillator in Arabidopsis that receives temporal information from a central “master” oscillator, conserves the rhythmicity by negative feedback, and transduces it to the output pathway by regulating a subset of clock-controlled transcripts.