Adoptive cell transfer (ACT) is a promising approach to cancer immunotherapy, but its efficiency fundamentally depends on the extent of tumor-specific T cell enrichment within the graft. This can be estimated via activation with identifiable neoantigens, tumor-associated antigens (TAAs), or living or lysed tumor cells, but these approaches remain laborious, time-consuming, and functionally limited, hampering clinical development of ACT. Here, we demonstrate that homology cluster analysis of T cell receptor (TCR) repertoires efficiently identifies tumor-reactive TCRs allowing to: (1) detect their presence within the pool of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs); (2) optimize TIL culturing conditions, with IL-2_low/IL-21/anti-PD-1 combination showing increased efficiency; (3) investigate surface marker-based enrichment for tumor-targeting T cells in freshly isolated TILs (enrichment confirmed for CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ PD-1⁺/CD39⁺ subsets), or re-stimulated TILs (informs on enrichment in 4-1BB-sorted cells). We believe that this approach to the rapid assessment of tumor-specific TCR enrichment should accelerate T cell therapy development.

There is considerable clinical and fundamental value in measuring the clonal heterogeneity of T and B cell expansions in tumors and tumor-associated lymphoid structures—along with the associated heterogeneity of the tumor neoantigen landscape—but such analyses remain challenging to perform. Here, we propose a straightforward approach to analyze the heterogeneity of immune repertoires between different tissue sections in a quantitative and controlled way, based on a beta-binomial noise model trained on control replicates obtained at the level of single-cell suspensions. This approach allows to identify local clonal expansions with high accuracy. We reveal in situ proliferation of clonal T cells in a mouse model of melanoma, and analyze heterogeneity of immunoglobulin repertoires between sections of a metastatically-infiltrated lymph node in human melanoma and primary human colon tumor. On the latter example, we demonstrate the importance of training the noise model on datasets with depth and content that is comparable to the samples being studied. Altogether, we describe here the crucial basic instrumentarium needed to facilitate proper experimental setup planning in the rapidly evolving field of intratumoral immune repertoires, from the wet lab to bioinformatics analysis.

Dysregulation of the immune system undoubtedly plays an important and, perhaps, determining role in the COVID-19 pathogenesis. While the main treatment of the COVID-19 intoxication is focused on neutralizing the excessive inflammatory response, it is worth considering an equally significant problem of the immunosuppressive conditions including immuno-paralysis, which lead to the secondary infection. Therefore, choosing a treatment strategy for the immune-mediated complications of coronavirus infection, one has to pass between Scylla and Charybdis, so that, in the fight against the “cytokine storm,” it is vital not to miss the point of the immune silence that turns into immuno-paralysis.

Clinical trials of targeted therapy (TT) and immunotherapy (IT) for highly aggressive advanced melanoma have shown marked improvements in response and survival rates. However, real-world data on treatment patterns and clinical outcomes for patients with advanced BRAF V600 mutant melanoma are ultimately scarce. The study was designed as an observational retrospective chart review study, which included 382 patients with advanced BRAF V600 mutant melanoma, who received TT in a real-world setting and were not involved in clinical trials. The data were collected from twelve medical centers in Russia. The objective response rates (ORRs) to combined BRAFi plus MEKi and to BRAFi mono-therapy were 57.4% and 39.8%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) were 9.2 months and 22.6 months, respectively, for the combined first-line therapy; 9.4 months and 16.1 months, respectively, for the combined second-line therapy; and 7.4 months and 17.1 months, respectively, for the combined third- or higher-line therapy. Analysis of treatment patterns demonstrated the effectiveness of the combined TT with BRAF plus MEK inhibitors in patients with brain metastases, rare types of BRAF mutations, and across lines of therapy, as well as a well-tolerated and manageable safety profile.

Introduction.Currently, numerous studies are published by authors of different countries to demonstrate the effectiveness of noninvasive methods in the diagnosis of melanoma.Methods.A systematic search was conducted independently in the databases PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) until April 2020 according to certain inclusion criteria. Data extraction was carried out independently, followed by generalization using descriptive tables. Due to the heterogeneity of the included studies and the impossibility of carrying out a meta-analysis in view of this, we performed a narrative description.Results.A total of 765 potential publications for inclusion were found and checked, of which 53 were included. By design, the studies were assigned to studies of simultaneous design – 40, to randomized clinical trials – 7, to meta-analysis – 6. Data in the included publications on 76802 skin neoplasms were reported, of which 9070 were melanomas. The extracted data were summarized in descriptive tables.Conclusion.With continuing technological progress, the development of noninvasive imaging technologies in the diagnosis of skin melanoma should follow the path of cost-effective, simple and accurate diagnosis.

Background. In an era of breakthroughs in cancer immunotherapy, CheckMate 067 studies declared the combination of PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors a new standard of care for patients with metastatic melanoma (MM). A significant limitation of the widespread use of the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab in routine clinical practice is the high risk of severe immune-mediated adverse events. Prolgolimab and nurulimab are a combination of fixed doses of original monoclonal antibodies (manufactured by JSC "BIOCAD," Russia) to the PD-1 receptor (prolgolimab) and the CTLA-4 receptor (nurulimab) (3:1 ratio). This paper presents the results of an international, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, comparative, randomized, phase II OBERTON clinical study to investigate the efficacy and safety of nurulimab + prolgolimab combination therapy with continued prolgolimab therapy compared to prolgolimab alone as first-line therapy in patients with unresectable melanoma (uRM) or MM (NCT03913923). Materials and methods. The study included patients with uRM or MM who were not previously treated for metastatic disease. The patients were randomized into two groups (1:1). Patients in group 1 were treated with a nurulimab (1 mg/kg) and prolgolimab (3 mg/kg) combination at a dose of 0.2 mL/kg (equivalent to 1 mg/kg of nurulimab and 3 mg/kg of prolgolimab) once every 3 weeks during the first 4 blinded infusions. Patients in group 2 received prolgolimab monotherapy at a dose of 3 mg/kg once every 3 weeks during the first 4 blinded infusions. Starting from infusion 5, patients in both groups received open prolgolimab 1 mg/kg once every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS). The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the number NCT05732805 and is currently ongoing, but recruitment of new patients has been completed. Results. One hundred seventeen patients were randomized and received at least one dose of the study therapy. At a median follow-up of 16.79 months, the median PFS was 12.2 (4.9; not achieved) months in the nurulimab + prolgolimab group and 2.8 (1.5; 4.7) months in the prolgolimab monotherapy group (95% confidence interval 0.36-0.90, hazard ratio 0.57). PFS at 24 months was 41% in the nurulimab + prolgolimab group and 25.4% in the prolgolimab monotherapy group. In both groups, the therapy was well tolerated. Grade 3-4 immune-mediated adverse events were reported in 15.5% of patients who received nurulimab + prolgolimab, compared with 1.7% of those who received prolgolimab alone. The most frequent grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events in both treatment groups were increased alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase and asthenia. Overall, the safety profile was favorable, as expected for the class of immune checkpoint inhibitors, anti-CTLA-4, and anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies. Discussion. The results demonstrate a favorable safety profile in both the nurulimab + prolgolimab combination and prolgolimab monotherapy groups as the first-line treatment for uRM or MM. The assessment of the primary endpoint, PFS, showed the benefit of combination immunotherapy followed by switching to prolgolimab compared to prolgolimab alone. Conclusion. Combination immunotherapy with the CTLA-4 inhibitor nurulimab and the PD-1 inhibitor prolgolimab, available as a combination of solutions of two drugs in a single vial, with a further switch to monotherapy with prolgolimab, can fill an important niche in the treatment of patients with uRM or MM. Confirmation of the obtained data on the efficacy and safety of the combined regimen of nurulimab + prolgolimab in comparison with PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy is expected from the ongoing phase III BCD-217-2 OCTAVA study (NCT05732805).