Drug delivery using natural biological carriers, especially erythrocytes, is a rapidly developing field. Such erythrocytes can act as carriers that prolong the drug’s action due to its gradual release from the carrier; as bioreactors with encapsulated enzymes performing the necessary reactions, while remaining inaccessible to the immune system and plasma proteases; or as a tool for targeted drug delivery to target organs, primarily to cells of the reticuloendothelial system, liver and spleen. To date, erythrocytes have been studied as carriers for a wide range of drugs, such as enzymes, antibiotics, anti-inflammatory, antiviral drugs, etc., and for diagnostic purposes (e.g., magnetic resonance imaging). The review focuses only on drugs loaded inside erythrocytes, defines the main lines of research for erythrocytes with bioactive substances, as well as the advantages and limitations of their application. Particular attention is paid to in vivo studies, opening-up the potential for the clinical use of drugs encapsulated into erythrocytes.

For the first time, the influence of COVID-19 on blood microrheology was studied. For this, the method of filtering erythrocytes through filters with pores of 3.5 μm was used. Filterability was shown to significantly decrease with the increasing severity of the patient’s condition, as well as with a decrease in the ratio of hemoglobin oxygen saturation to the oxygen fraction in the inhaled air (SpO₂/FiO₂). The filterability of ≤ 0.65, or its fast decrease during treatment, were indicators of a poor prognosis. Filterability increased significantly with an increase in erythrocyte count, hematocrit and blood concentrations of hemoglobin, albumin, and total protein. The effect of these parameters on the erythrocyte filterability is directly opposite to their effect on blood macrorheology, where they all increase blood viscosity, worsening the erythrocyte deformability. The erythrocyte filterability decreased with increasing oxygen supply rate, especially in patients on mechanical ventilation, apparently not due to the oxygen supplied, but to the deterioration of the patients’ condition. Filterability significantly correlates with the C-reactive protein, which indicates that inflammation affects the blood microrheology in the capillaries. Thus, the filterability of erythrocytes is a good tool for studying the severity of the patient’s condition and his prognosis in COVID-19.

Materials and methods: a prospective non-randomized pilot multicenter study of the informativeness and clinical significance of hemostasis laboratory tests in 1210 patients with COVID-19 in disease course, including favorable and unfavorable outcomes, was performed. Hemostasis was assessed using clotting tests and D-dimer concentration, thromboelastography (TEG) and thrombodynamics (TD). Results: comparison of COVID-19 laboratory parameters and clinical picture showed that 75% of patients have pronounced activation of the plasma coagulation system upon admission to the hospital. Hypercoagulation is recorded in all tests, reaching a maximum in patients with subtotal (CT-3) and total (CT-4) lung lesion and/or resuscitation patients with a clinical picture of pulmonary embolism and unfavorable outcome. Low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) in a standard dosage leads to suppression of the initial hypercoagulable syndrome in more than half of the patients (from 75 to 31%). All patients without LMWH laboratory effect developed thrombotic complications. For clotting tests, insufficient sensitivity to changes in hemostasis against the background of LMWH was revealed. The D-dimer test effectively correlates with the severity and outcomes of COVID-19, but is not suitable for the control of heparin therapy, which is associated with the effect of lysis of existing blood clots and the lack of response to a decrease in the coagulation activity of patients. Methods of thromboelastography and thrombodynamics effectively record a decrease in the activity of the coagulation system and can be used to control heparin therapy. The correlation coefficient between the methods was 0,77. The dynamic indices of D-dimers, TEG and TD in severe patients and, especially, in patients with fatal outcomes revealed the greatest sensitivity to the control of heparin therapy in the Thrombodynamics test, which allows, along with thrombosis, to record hypercoagulable states and the risk of bleeding, which are the outcome of thrombohemorrhagic syndrome in patients with COVID-19.

Background: Blood coagulation abnormalities play a major role in COVID-19 pathophysiology. However, the specific details of hypercoagulation and anticoagulation treatment require investigation. The aim of this study was to investigate the status of the coagulation system by means of integral and local clotting assays in COVID-19 patients on admission to the hospital and in hospitalized COVID-19 patients receiving heparin thromboprophylaxis. Methods: Thrombodynamics (TD), thromboelastography (TEG), and standard clotting assays were performed in 153 COVID-19 patients observed in a hospital setting. All patients receiving treatment, except extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients (n = 108), were administered therapeutic doses of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) depending on body weight. The ECMO patients (n = 15) were administered unfractionated heparin (UFH). Results: On admission, the patients (n = 30) had extreme hypercoagulation by all integral assays: TD showed hypercoagulation in ~75% of patients, while TEG showed hypercoagulation in ~50% of patients. The patients receiving treatment showed a significant heparin response based on TD; 77% of measurements were in the hypocoagulation range, 15% were normal, and 8% remained in hypercoagulation. TEG showed less of a response to heparin: 24% of measurements were in the hypocoagulation range, 59% were normal and 17% remained in hypercoagulation. While hypocoagulation is likely due to heparin treatment, remaining in significant hypercoagulation may indicate insufficient anticoagulation for some patients, which is in agreement with our clinical findings. There were 3 study patients with registered thrombosis episodes, and all were outside the target range for TD parameters typical for effective thromboprophylaxis (1 patient was in weak hypocoagulation, atypical for the LMWH dose used, and 2 patients remained in the hypercoagulation range despite therapeutic LMWH doses). Conclusion: Patients with COVID-19 have severe hypercoagulation, which persists in some patients receiving anticoagulation treatment, while significant hypocoagulation is observed in others. The data suggest critical issues of hemostasis balance in these patients and indicate the potential importance of integral assays in its control.

The limitations of the efficiency of ammonium-neutralizing erythrocyte-bioreactors based on glutamate dehydrogenase and alanine aminotransferase reactions were analyzed using a mathematical model. At low pyruvate concentrations in the external medium (below about 0.3 mM), the main limiting factor is the rate of pyruvate influx into the erythrocyte from the outside, and at higher concentrations, it is the disappearance of a steady state in glycolysis if the rate of ammonium processing is higher than the critical value (about 12 mM/h). This rate corresponds to different values of glutamate dehydrogenase activity at different concentrations of pyruvate in plasma. Oxidation of reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) by glutamate dehydrogenase decreases the fraction of NADPH in the constant pool of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphates (NADP + NADPH). This, in turn, activates the pentose phosphate pathway, where NADP reduces to NADPH. Due to the increase in flux through the pentose phosphate pathway, stabilization of the ATP concentration becomes impossible; its value increases until almost the entire pool of adenylates transforms into the ATP form. As the pool of adenylates is constant, the ADP concentration decreases dramatically. This slows the pyruvate kinase reaction, leading to the disappearance of the steady state in glycolysis.

Background. L-asparaginase is an enzyme, widely used in the therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children and adults, but its use is limited due to a wide range of side effects and anaphylactic reactions. L-asparaginase loaded into erythrocytes can solve these problems. This enzyme is protected from the immune system and plasma proteases due to erythrocyte membrane, but continues to work inside the cell because its membrane is permeable to L-asparagine. Thus, the half-life of the drug increases and anaphylactic reactions reduce. The encapsulation of L-asparaginase into erythrocytes can be performed by various osmotic methods. Each of them is characterized by the amount of encapsulated enzyme, the cell yield, as well as by the quality indices of the survived erythrocytes. An important parameter of each method is the possibility to provide sterility of this dosage form for the clinical use.The aim of the study was the comparing of three osmotic methods of L-asparaginase encapsulation into erythrocytes (hypo-osmotic lysis, dialysis and flow dialysis) to select the most promising method for clinical use.Materials and methods. A suspension of erythrocytes of healthy donors (hematocrit 60–70%) was mixed with L-asparaginase from E. сoli. The procedures of hypotonic reversible lysis, dialysis in dialysis bags, or flow dialysis using pediatric dialyzers were performed. The physiological osmolality was restored in suspensions after the procedure by the addition of a hypertonic solution, and they were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. Then the cells were washed in isotonic phosphate-buffered saline with pH 7.4. Activity of L-asparaginase, volume, hematocrit, hematological indices and osmotic cell fragility of erythrocytes were measured in the suspensions of erythrocytes before and after the enzyme encapsulation procedure.Results. An optimal osmolality of the hypotonic buffer for each method was selected and was equal to 90–110 mOsm/kg. The yields of encapsulation were 4.2 ± 2.0, 6.0 ± 2.3 and 16.2 ± 2.2 % for hypotonic lysis, dialysis and flow dialysis, respectively. The hematological indices of the obtained erythrocyte-carriers differed from the corresponding parameters of the initial erythrocytes, but did not differ significantly for different methods.Conclusion. Comparative investigation of mentioned above parameters allowed choosing the method of flow dialysis as the most promising for clinical use.