The gene mutated in ataxia telangiectasia, ATM, has been implicated in several cell functions such as cell cycle control and response to DNA damage and insulin. PKB/Akt has also been implicated in the cellular response to insulin, γ-radiation, and cell cycle control. Interestingly, lack of PKB/Akt function in vivo is able to mimic some phenotypic abnormalities associated with ataxia telangiectasia (AT). Here we show that ATM is a major determinant of full PKB/Akt activation in response to insulin or γ-radiation. This effect is mediated through the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase domain of ATM that specifically affects Akt serine 473 phosphorylation. This conclusion was inferred from the results obtained in transient transfection assays using exogenous PKB/Akt and ATM in Cos cells. Moreover, the use of ATM inhibitors or small interfering RNA confirmed our observation. Further supporting these results, we also observed that biological responses tightly regulated by Akt, such as transcription factor of the forkhead family activity after insulin treatment or γ-radiation response, were altered in cell lines derived from AT patients and knockout mice for ATM in which phosphorylation in serine 473 was almost abolished. This study proposes new clues in the search of the unknown PDK2 and new explanations for the radiosensitivity or insulin intolerance described more than 30 years ago in AT patients.

P38 MAPK has been implicated in the response to cancer therapy. To determine whether the activation of p38 MAPK could be specific to cancer therapy, we investigated the activation of p38 MAPK in response to several chemotherapeutic agents, such as cisplatin, doxorubicin and taxol in several human cell lines. Activation of p38 MAPK was measured after exposure to several chemotherapeutic agents, using specific phosphoantibodies. Only cisplatin was able to activate p38 MAPK in all the cell lines tested. Furthermore, other platinum compounds such as transplatin and platinum (IV) chloride can induce activation of p38 MAPK. The kinetics of this activation is a key event in the biological role of p38 MAPK in response to cisplatin, as we conclude from the differences observed after treatment with transplatin and cisplatin. The p38 MAPK activation is independent of the origin or genetic alterations of the cell lines and seems to be mediated through both upstream activators MKK6 and MKK3. Although the isoforms α/β are mainly activated, we also demonstrated that other members of the p38 MAPK family were susceptible to activation by cisplatin when they were overexpressed in 293 T. Finally, pretreatment with specific inhibitors (SB 203580 and SKF 86002) induces a resistant phenotype in response to cisplatin. Furthermore, low activation of this SAPK pathway correlates with a resistant phenotype as demonstrated in our experimental model of head and neck cancer. Therefore, we conclude that the p38 MAPK pathway is a specific target for cisplatin-based therapy with clinical implications.

Cellular aspartate drives cancer cell proliferation, but signaling pathways that rewire aspartate biosynthesis to control cell growth remain largely unknown. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF1α) can suppress tumor cell proliferation. Here, we discovered that HIF1α acts as a direct repressor of aspartate biosynthesis involving the suppression of several key aspartate-producing proteins, including cytosolic glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase-1 (GOT1) and mitochondrial GOT2. Accordingly, HIF1α suppresses aspartate production from both glutamine oxidation as well as the glutamine reductive pathway. Strikingly, the addition of aspartate to the culture medium is sufficient to relieve HIF1α-dependent repression of tumor cell proliferation. Furthermore, these key aspartate-producing players are specifically repressed in VHL-deficient human renal carcinomas, a paradigmatic tumor type in which HIF1α acts as a tumor suppressor, highlighting the in vivo relevance of these findings. In conclusion, we show that HIF1α inhibits cytosolic and mitochondrial aspartate biosynthesis and that this mechanism is the molecular basis for HIF1α tumor suppressor activity.