Matthew Redinbo

Prof. Matthew Redinbo

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 November 2010 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BWBret D. Wallace
Bret D. Wallace
HWHongwei Wang
Hongwei Wang
KLKimberly T. Lane
Kimberly T. Lane
JSJohn E. Scott
John E. Scott
JOJillian Orans
Jillian Orans
MRMatthew Redinbo
Matthew Redinbo
Blocking Interfering Microbes: Irinotecan is a widely used anticancer pro-drug that is converted in the liver into the active form, but when it gets into the gut, the normally benign microbial flora can convert it into the toxic form, which kills the rapidly multiplying gut epithelium as it would kill rapidly dividing tumor cells, and thus causes diarrhea.Wallaceet al.(p.831; see the Perspective byPatel and Kaufmann) used high-throughput screening to identify inhibitors that target the offending bacterial enzyme, β-glucuronidase, without killing the bacteria or affecting orthologous mammalian enzymes. Crystal structures revealed the molecular basis of selectivity, and in vivo studies showed that an inhibitor protected mice from irinotecan-induced toxicity.

1 December 2019 in Journal of Biological Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SESamantha M. Ervin
Samantha M. Ervin
HLHao Li
Hao Li
LLLauren Lim
Lauren Lim
LRLee R. Roberts
Lee R. Roberts
XLXue Liang
Xue Liang
MRMatthew Redinbo
Matthew Redinbo
Gut microbial β-glucuronidase (GUS) enzymes have been suggested to be involved in the estrobolome, the collection of microbial reactions involving estrogens. Furthermore, bacterial GUS enzymes within the gastrointestinal tract have been postulated to be a contributing factor in hormone-driven cancers. However, to date, there has been no experimental evidence to support these hypotheses. Here we provide the first in vitro analysis of the ability of 35 human gut microbial GUS enzymes to reactivate two distinct estrogen glucuronides, estrone-3-glucuronide and estradiol-17-glucuronide, to estrone and estradiol, respectively. We show that certain members within the Loop 1, mini-Loop 1, and FMN-binding classes of gut microbial GUS enzymes can reactivate estrogens from their inactive glucuronides. We provide molecular details of key interactions that facilitate these catalytic processes and present the structures of two novel human gut microbial GUS enzymes related to the estrobolome. Further, we demonstrate that estrogen reactivation by Loop 1 bacterial GUS enzymes can be inhibited both in purified enzymes and in fecal preparations of mixed murine fecal microbiota. Finally, however, despite these in vitro and ex vivo data, we show that a Loop 1 GUS-specific inhibitor is not capable of reducing the development of tumors in the PyMT mouse model of breast cancer. These findings validate that gut microbial GUS enzymes participate in the estrobolome but also suggest that the estrobolome is a multidimensional set of processes on-going within the mammalian gastrointestinal tract that likely involves many enzymes, including several distinct types of GUS proteins.

17 June 2021 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PJPierre Jacob
Pierre Jacob
NKNak Hyun Kim
Nak Hyun Kim
FWFeihua Wu
Feihua Wu
FKFarid El Kasmi
Farid El Kasmi
YCYuan Chi
Yuan Chi
JDJeffery L. Dangl
Jeffery L. Dangl
Calcium signaling for host cell death: In response to microbial pathogens, some plants kill off their own cells to limit further spread of infection. The Toll/Interleukin-1 receptor/Resistance class of nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat receptors (known as TNLs) function in plants as immune receptors. These TNLs work together with a dedicated set of helper proteins. Jacob et al. reveal the structure of one of these helpers known as NRG1 (N REQUIREMENT GENE 1). The structure resembles a known animal cation channel. The authors demonstrate that helper NLRs directly control calcium ion influx to initiate host cell death, providing a mechanism for TNL outputs. Science , abg7917, this issue p. 420

1 July 2017 in Structure
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RPRebecca M. Pollet
Rebecca M. Pollet
EDEmma H. D'Agostino
Emma H. D'Agostino
WWWilliam G. Walton
William G. Walton
YXYongmei Xu
Yongmei Xu
MLMichael S. Little
Michael S. Little
MRMatthew Redinbo
Matthew Redinbo

1 September 2015 in Chemistry & Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BWBret D. Wallace
Bret D. Wallace
ARAdam B. Roberts
Adam B. Roberts
RPRebecca M. Pollet
Rebecca M. Pollet
JIJames D. Ingle
James D. Ingle
KBKristen A. Biernat
Kristen A. Biernat
MRMatthew Redinbo
Matthew Redinbo

13 March 2020 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABAadra P. Bhatt
Aadra P. Bhatt
SPSamuel J. Pellock
Samuel J. Pellock
KBKristen A. Biernat
Kristen A. Biernat
WWWilliam G. Walton
William G. Walton
BWBret D. Wallace
Bret D. Wallace
MRMatthew Redinbo
Matthew Redinbo
Irinotecan treats a range of solid tumors, but its effectiveness is severely limited by gastrointestinal (GI) tract toxicity caused by gut bacterial β-glucuronidase (GUS) enzymes. Targeted bacterial GUS inhibitors have been shown to partially alleviate irinotecan-induced GI tract damage and resultant diarrhea in mice. Here, we unravel the mechanistic basis for GI protection by gut microbial GUS inhibitors using in vivo models. We use in vitro, in fimo, and in vivo models to determine whether GUS inhibition alters the anticancer efficacy of irinotecan. We demonstrate that a single dose of irinotecan increases GI bacterial GUS activity in 1 d and reduces intestinal epithelial cell proliferation in 5 d, both blocked by a single dose of a GUS inhibitor. In a tumor xenograft model, GUS inhibition prevents intestinal toxicity and maintains the antitumor efficacy of irinotecan. Remarkably, GUS inhibitor also effectively blocks the striking irinotecan-induced bloom of Enterobacteriaceae in immune-deficient mice. In a genetically engineered mouse model of cancer, GUS inhibition alleviates gut damage, improves survival, and does not alter gut microbial composition; however, by allowing dose intensification, it dramatically improves irinotecan’s effectiveness, reducing tumors to a fraction of that achieved by irinotecan alone, while simultaneously promoting epithelial regeneration. These results indicate that targeted gut microbial enzyme inhibitors can improve cancer chemotherapeutic outcomes by protecting the gut epithelium from microbial dysbiosis and proliferative crypt damage.