Brendan Choat

Prof. Brendan Choat


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 November 2012 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BCBrendan Choat
Brendan Choat
SJSteven Jansen
Steven Jansen
TBTim J. Brodribb
Tim J. Brodribb
HCHervé Cochard
Hervé Cochard
SDSylvain Delzon
Sylvain Delzon
AZAmy E. Zanne
Amy E. Zanne

31 December 2019 in Global Change Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JKJens Kattge
Jens Kattge
GBGerhard Bönisch
Gerhard Bönisch
SDSandra Díaz
Sandra Díaz
SLSandra Lavorel
Sandra Lavorel
IPIain Colin Prentice
Iain Colin Prentice
CWChristian Wirth
Christian Wirth
Plant traits—the morphological, anatomical, physiological, biochemical and phenological characteristics of plants—determine how plants respond to environmental factors, affect other trophic levels, and influence ecosystem properties and their benefits and detriments to people. Plant trait data thus represent the basis for a vast area of research spanning from evolutionary biology, community and functional ecology, to biodiversity conservation, ecosystem and landscape management, restoration, biogeography and earth system modelling. Since its foundation in 2007, the TRY database of plant traits has grown continuously. It now provides unprecedented data coverage under an open access data policy and is the main plant trait database used by the research community worldwide. Increasingly, the TRY database also supports new frontiers of trait‐based plant research, including the identification of data gaps and the subsequent mobilization or measurement of new data. To support this development, in this article we evaluate the extent of the trait data compiled in TRY and analyse emerging patterns of data coverage and representativeness. Best species coverage is achieved for categorical traits—almost complete coverage for ‘plant growth form’. However, most traits relevant for ecology and vegetation modelling are characterized by continuous intraspecific variation and trait–environmental relationships. These traits have to be measured on individual plants in their respective environment. Despite unprecedented data coverage, we observe a humbling lack of completeness and representativeness of these continuous traits in many aspects. We, therefore, conclude that reducing data gaps and biases in the TRY database remains a key challenge and requires a coordinated approach to data mobilization and trait measurements. This can only be achieved in collaboration with other initiatives.

27 June 2018 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BCBrendan Choat
Brendan Choat
TBTimothy J. Brodribb
Timothy J. Brodribb
CBCraig R. Brodersen
Craig R. Brodersen
RDRemko A. Duursma
Remko A. Duursma
RLRosana López
Rosana López
PMProfessor Belinda Medlyn
Professor Belinda Medlyn

18 April 2016 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WAWilliam R. L. Anderegg
William R. L. Anderegg
TKTamir Klein
Tamir Klein
MBMegan Bartlett
Megan Bartlett
LSLawren Sack
Lawren Sack
APAdam Pellegrini
Adam Pellegrini
SJSteven Jansen
Steven Jansen
Significance: Predicting the impacts of climate extremes on plant communities is a central challenge in ecology. Physiological traits may improve prediction of drought impacts on forests globally. We perform a meta-analysis across 33 studies that span all forested biomes and find that, among the examined traits, hydraulic traits explain cross-species patterns in mortality from drought. Gymnosperm and angiosperm mortality was associated with different hydraulic traits, giving insight into the relative weights of different traits and mechanisms in mortality prediction. Our results provide a foundation for more mechanistic predictions of drought-induced tree mortality across Earth’s diverse forests.

17 April 2020 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TBTimothy J. Brodribb
Timothy J. Brodribb
JPJennifer S Powers
Jennifer S Powers
HCHervé Cochard
Hervé Cochard
BCBrendan Choat
Brendan Choat
Trees are the living foundations on which most terrestrial biodiversity is built. Central to the success of trees are their woody bodies, which connect their elevated photosynthetic canopies with the essential belowground activities of water and nutrient acquisition. The slow construction of these carbon-dense, woody skeletons leads to a slow generation time, leaving trees and forests highly susceptible to rapid changes in climate. Other long-lived, sessile organisms such as corals appear to be poorly equipped to survive rapid changes, which raises questions about the vulnerability of contemporary forests to future climate change. The emerging view that, similar to corals, tree species have rather inflexible damage thresholds, particularly in terms of water stress, is especially concerning. This Review examines recent progress in our understanding of how the future looks for forests growing in a hotter and drier atmosphere.

17 September 2015 in New Phytologist
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SGSean M. Gleason
Sean M. Gleason
MWMark Westoby
Mark Westoby
SJSteven Jansen
Steven Jansen
BCBrendan Choat
Brendan Choat
UHUwe G. Hacke
Uwe G. Hacke
AZAmy E. Zanne
Amy E. Zanne
Summary: The evolution of lignified xylem allowed for the efficient transport of water under tension, but also exposed the vascular network to the risk of gas emboli and the spread of gas between xylem conduits, thus impeding sap transport to the leaves. A well‐known hypothesis proposes that the safety of xylem (its ability to resist embolism formation and spread) should trade off against xylem efficiency (its capacity to transport water). We tested this safety–efficiency hypothesis in branch xylem across 335 angiosperm and 89 gymnosperm species. Safety was considered at three levels: the xylem water potentials where 12%, 50% and 88% of maximal conductivity are lost. Although correlations between safety and efficiency were weak (r2 < 0.086), no species had high efficiency and high safety, supporting the idea for a safety–efficiency tradeoff. However, many species had low efficiency and low safety. Species with low efficiency and low safety were weakly associated (r2 < 0.02 in most cases) with higher wood density, lower leaf‐ to sapwood‐area and shorter stature. There appears to be no persuasive explanation for the considerable number of species with both low efficiency and low safety. These species represent a real challenge for understanding the evolution of xylem.