joseph blayney

joseph blayney

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 December 2023 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JBjoseph blayney
joseph blayney
HFHelena Francis
Helena Francis
ARAlexandra Rampasekova
Alexandra Rampasekova
BCBrendan Camellato
Brendan Camellato
LMLeslie Mitchell
Leslie Mitchell
MKMira Kassouf
Mira Kassouf
Super-enhancers are compound regulatory elements that control expression of key cell identity genes. They recruit high levels of tissue-specific transcription factors and co-activators such as the Mediator complex and contact target gene promoters with high frequency. Most super-enhancers contain multiple constituent regulatory elements, but it is unclear whether these elements have distinct roles in activating target gene expression. Here, by rebuilding the endogenous multipartite α-globin super-enhancer, we show that it contains bioinformatically equivalent but functionally distinct element types: classical enhancers and facilitator elements. Facilitators have no intrinsic enhancer activity, yet in their absence, classical enhancers are unable to fully upregulate their target genes. Without facilitators, classical enhancers exhibit reduced Mediator recruitment, enhancer RNA transcription, and enhancer-promoter interactions. Facilitators are interchangeable but display functional hierarchy based on their position within a multipartite enhancer. Facilitators thus play an important role in potentiating the activity of classical enhancers and ensuring robust activation of target genes.

7 January 2022 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HFHelena S. Francis
Helena S. Francis
CHCaroline L. Harold
Caroline L. Harold
RBRobert A. Beagrie
Robert A. Beagrie
AKAndrew J. King
Andrew J. King
MGMatthew E. Gosden
Matthew E. Gosden
MKMira T. Kassouf
Mira T. Kassouf
Mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) can be manipulated in vitro to recapitulate the process of erythropoiesis, during which multipotent cells undergo lineage specification, differentiation and maturation to produce erythroid cells. Although useful for identifying specific progenitors and precursors, this system has not been fully exploited as a source of cells to analyse erythropoiesis. Here, we establish a protocol in which characterised erythroblasts can be isolated in a scalable manner from differentiated embryoid bodies (EBs). Using transcriptional and epigenetic analysis, we demonstrate that this system faithfully recapitulates normal primitive erythropoiesis and fully reproduces the effects of natural and engineered mutations seen in primary cells obtained from mouse models. We anticipate this system to be of great value in reducing the time and costs of generating and maintaining mouse lines in a number of research scenarios.

21 June 2022 in bioRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
JBjoseph blayney
joseph blayney
HFHelena Francis
Helena Francis
BCBrendan R Camellato
Brendan R Camellato
LMLeslie Mitchell
Leslie Mitchell
RSRosa Stolper
Rosa Stolper
MKMira Kassouf
Mira Kassouf
Super-enhancers (SEs) are a class of compound regulatory elements which control expression of key cell-identity genes. It remains unclear whether they are simply clusters of independent classical enhancers or whether SEs manifest emergent properties and should therefore be considered as a distinct class of element. Here, using synthetic biology and genome editing, we engineered the well characterised erythroid α-globin SE at the endogenous α-globin locus, removing all SE constituent elements in a mouse embryonic stem cell-line, to create a “blank canvas”. This has allowed us to re-build the SE through individual and combinatorial reinsertion of its five elements (R1, R2, R3, Rm, R4), to test the importance of each constituent’s sequence and position within the locus. Each re-inserted element independently creates a region of open chromatin and binds its normal repertoire of transcription factors; however, we found a high degree of functional interdependence between the five constituents. Surprisingly, the two strongest α-globin enhancers (R1 and R2) act sub-optimally both on their own and in combination, and although the other three elements (R3, Rm and R4) exhibit no discernible enhancer activity, they each exert a major positive effect in facilitating the activity of the classical enhancers (R1 and R2). This effect depends not simply on the sequence of each element but on their positions within the cluster. We propose that these “facilitators” are a novel form of regulatory element, important for ensuring the full activity of SEs, but distinct from conventional enhancer elements.

29 July 2020 in Methods and Protocols
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JBjoseph blayney
joseph blayney
EFEvangeline Foster
Evangeline Foster
MJMarta Jagielowicz
Marta Jagielowicz
MKMira Kreuzer
Mira Kreuzer
MMMatteo Morotti
Matteo Morotti
Philip HublitzPhilip Hublitz
Philip Hublitz
Use of dual sgRNAs is a common CRISPR/Cas9-based strategy for the creation of genetic deletions. The ease of screening combined with a rather high rate of success makes this approach a reliable genome engineering procedure. Recently, a number of studies using CRISPR/Cas9 have revealed unwanted large-scale rearrangements, duplications, inversions or larger-than-expected deletions. Strict quality control measures are required to validate the model system, and this crucially depends on knowing which potential experimental outcomes to expect. Using the dual sgRNA deletion approach, our team discovered high levels of excision, inversion and re-insertion at the site of targeting. We detected those at a variety of genomic loci and in several immortalized cell lines, demonstrating that inverted re-insertions are a common by-product with an overall frequency between 3% and 20%. Our findings imply an inherent danger in the misinterpretation of screening data when using only a single PCR screening. While amplification of the region of interest might classify clones as wild type (WT) based on amplicon size, secondary analyses can discover heterozygous (HET) clones among presumptive WTs, and events deemed as HET clones could potentially be full KO. As such, screening for inverted re-insertions helps in decreasing the number of clones required to obtain a full KO. With this technical note, we want to raise awareness of this phenomenon and suggest implementing a standard secondary PCR while screening for deletions.

17 October 2023 in bioRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
EGEmily Georgiades
Emily Georgiades
CHCaroline L. Harrold
Caroline L. Harrold
NRNigel Roberts
Nigel Roberts
MKMira Kassouf
Mira Kassouf
SRSimone G. Riva
Simone G. Riva
JHJim R Hughes
Jim R Hughes
As the structure of the genome is analysed at ever increasing resolution it is becoming clear that there is considerable variation in the 3D chromatin architecture across different cell types. It has been proposed that this may, in part, be due to increased recruitment of cohesin to activated cis-elements (enhancers and promoters) leading to cell-type specific loop extrusion underlying the formation of new subTADs. Here we show that cohesin correlates well with the presence of active enhancers and this varies in an allele-specific manner with the presence or absence of polymorphic enhancers which vary from one individual to another. Using the alpha globin cluster as a model, we show that when all enhancers are removed, peaks of cohesin disappear from these regions and the erythroid specific subTAD is no longer formed. Re-insertion of the major alpha globin enhancer (R2) is associated with the appearance of a new peak of cohesin at the site of insertion. In complementary experiments insertion of R2 into a “neutral” region of the genome recruits cohesin, induces transcription and creates a new large (75kb) erythroid specific domain. Together these findings support the proposal that active enhancers recruit cohesin, stimulate loop extrusion and promote the formation of cell specific subTADs.