Liming Cai

Liming Cai


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2014 in Combustion and Flame
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LCLiming Cai
Liming Cai
ASAlena Sudholt
Alena Sudholt
DLDong Joon Lee
Dong Joon Lee
FEFokion N. Egolfopoulos
Fokion N. Egolfopoulos
HPHeinz Pitsch
Heinz Pitsch
SSS. Mani Sarathy
S. Mani Sarathy

20 January 2021 in Energy & Fuels
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LCLiming Cai
Liming Cai
FLFlorian Vom Lehn
Florian Vom Lehn
HPHeinz Pitsch
Heinz Pitsch

1 September 2017 in Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MDMarco Davidovic
Marco Davidovic
TFTobias Falkenstein
Tobias Falkenstein
MBMathis Bode
Mathis Bode
LCLiming Cai
Liming Cai
SKSeongwon Kang
Seongwon Kang
HPHeinz Pitsch
Heinz Pitsch
Oil & Gas Science and Technology - Revue d'IFP Energies nouvelles

1 April 2017 in Combustion and Flame
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LCLiming Cai
Liming Cai
HMHeiko Minwegen
Heiko Minwegen
JBJoachim Beeckmann
Joachim Beeckmann
UBUltan Burke
Ultan Burke
RTRupali Tripathi
Rupali Tripathi
HPHeinz Pitsch
Heinz Pitsch

19 August 2020 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SEStefania Esposito
Stefania Esposito
MMMax Mally
Max Mally
LCLiming Cai
Liming Cai
HPHeinz Pitsch
Heinz Pitsch
SPStefan Pischinger
Stefan Pischinger
Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) three-dimensional (3D) computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of gaseous emissions from combustion engines are very demanding due to the complex geometry, the emissions formation mechanisms, and the transient processes inside the cylinders. The validation of emission simulation is challenging because of modeling simplifications, fundamental differences from reality (e.g., fuel surrogates), and difficulty in the comparison with measured emission values, which depend on the measuring position. In this study, detailed gaseous emission data were acquired for a spark ignition (SI) direct-injection (DI) single-cylinder engine (SCE) fueled with a toluene reference fuel (TRF) surrogate to allow precise comparison with simulations. Multiple devices in different sampling locations were used for the measurement of average emission concentration, as well as hydrocarbon (HC) cycle- and species-resolved values. A RANS 3D-CFD methodology to predict gaseous pollutants was developed and validated with this experimental database. For precise validation, the emission comparison was performed in the exact same locations as the pollutants were measured. Additionally, the same surrogate fuel used in the measurements was defined in the simulation. To focus on the emission prediction, the pressure and heat release traces were reproduced by calibrating a G-equation flame propagation model. The differences of simulation results with measurements were within 4% for CO2, while for O2 and NO, the deviations were within 26%. CO emissions were generally overestimated probably because of inaccuracies in mixture formation. For HC emissions, deviations up to 50% were observed possibly due to inexact estimation of the influence of the piston-ring crevice geometry. The reasonable prediction accuracy in the RANS context makes the method a useful framework for the analysis of emissions from SI engines, as well as for mechanism validation under engine relevant conditions.

2 May 2017 in Energy & Fuels
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LCLiming Cai
Liming Cai
SKStephan Kruse
Stephan Kruse
DFDaniel Felsmann
Daniel Felsmann
CTChristoph Thies
Christoph Thies
KYKiran K. Yalamanchi
Kiran K. Yalamanchi
HPHeinz Pitsch
Heinz Pitsch