Summary: Remimazolam, a short‐acting benzodiazepine, may be used for induction and maintenance of total intravenous anaesthesia, but its role in the management of patients with multiple comorbidities remains unclear. In this phase 3 randomised controlled trial, we compared the anaesthetic efficacy and the incidence of postinduction hypotension during total intravenous anaesthesia with remimazolam vs. propofol. A total of 365 patients (ASA physical status 3 or 4) scheduled for elective surgery were assigned randomly to receive total intravenous anaesthesia with remimazolam (n = 270) or propofol (n = 95). Primary outcome was anaesthetic effect, quantified as the percentage of time with Narcotrend® Index values ≤ 60, during surgery (skin incision to last skin suture), with a non‐inferiority margin of ‐10%. Secondary outcome was the incidence of postinduction hypotensive events. Mean (SD) percentage of time with Narcotrend Index values ≤ 60 during surgery across all patients receiving remimazolam (93% (20.7)) was non‐inferior to propofol (99% (4.2)), mean difference (97.5%CI) ‐6.28% (‐8.89–infinite); p = 0.003. Mean (SD) number of postinduction hypotension events was 62 (38.1) and 71 (41.1) for patients allocated to the remimazolam and propofol groups, respectively; p = 0.015. Noradrenaline administration events (requirement for a bolus and/or infusion) were also lower in patients allocated to remimazolam compared with propofol (14 (13.5) vs. 20 (14.6), respectively; p < 0.001). In conclusion, in patients who were ASA physical status 3 or 4, the anaesthetic effect of remimazolam was non‐inferior to propofol.

The use of general anaesthetics has facilitated great advantages in surgery within the last 150 years. General anaesthesia is composed of several components including analgesia, amnesia, hypnosis and immobility. To achieve these components, general anaesthetics have to act via multiple molecular targets at different anatomical sites in the central nervous system. Much of our current understanding of how anaesthetics work has been obtained within the last few years on the basis of genetic approaches, in particular knock-out or knock-in mice. Anaesthetic drugs can be grouped into volatile and intravenous anaesthetics according to their route of administration. Common volatile anaesthetics induce immobility via molecular targets in the spinal cord, including glycine receptors, GABAA receptors, glutamate receptors, and TREK-1 potassium channels. In contrast, intravenous anaesthetics cause immobility almost exclusively via GABAA receptors harbouring β3 subunits. Hypnosis is predominantly mediated by β3-subunit containing GABAA receptors in the brain, whereas β2 subunit containing receptors, which make up more than 50% of all GABAA receptors in the central nervous system, mediate sedation. At clinically relevant concentrations, ketamine and nitrous oxide block NMDA receptors. Unlike all other anaesthetics in clinical use they produce analgesia. Not only desired actions of anaesthetics, but also undesired side effects are linked to certain receptors. Respiratory depression involves β3 containing GABAA receptors whereas hypothermia is largely mediated by GABAA receptors containing β2 subunits. These recent insights into the clinically desired and undesired actions of anaesthetic agents provide new avenues for the design of drugs with an improved side-effect profile. Such agents would be especially beneficial for the treatment of newborn children, elderly patients and patients undergoing ambulatory surgery.

Binding site for benzodiazepines. At present, it is unclear if, and to what extent, this novel nonclassical binding site is of relevance for the actions of benzodiazepines in the central nervous system. METHODS: Because neocortex is involved in mediating the sedative and hypnotic properties of general anesthetics, we quantified the actions of diazepam over a wide range of concentrations (from 10 nM up to 100 μM) in organotypic slice cultures using extracellular multiunit recordings of spontaneous action potential activity. RESULTS: Up to a concentration of 6.25 μM, diazepam reduced the activity of neocortical neurons, approaching a maximum of approximately 20%. This action was nullified by the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil. At concentrations >12.5 μM, diazepam evoked a second concentration-dependent dampening of network activity. Unlike the low concentration effect, this high concentration component was resistant to flumazenil. CONCLUSIONS: Diazepam induced a biphasic attenuation of spontaneous action potential firing of neocortical neurons. Low to moderate concentrations caused a monotonic, mild depression that is mediated via the classical binding site as it is antagonized by flumazenil. However, the effects of diazepam observed at high concentrations were not affected by flumazenil. Hence, these findings support the concept of at least 2 different binding sites for benzodiazepines on γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors. Furthermore, our results are consistent with the hypothesis that the classical high-affinity binding site mediates low-dose diazepam actions, such as amnesia, anxiolysis, and sedation, while a second, nonclassical and independent site contributes to the anesthetic effects of diazepam, such as hypnosis and immobility....