Background and objectives: The primary objective was to evaluate the benefit of training with virtual reality simulation. The secondary objective was to describe the short-term skill acquisition obtained by simulation training and to determine the factors affecting its magnitude. Materials and Methods: We prospectively performed a three-stage evaluation: face, constructive, and predictive to evaluate the training with a laparoscopic simulator with haptic feedback. The participants (n = 63) were divided according to their level of experience into three groups: 16% residents; 46% specialists and 38% were consultants. Results: Face evaluation demonstrates the acceptance of the design and realism of the tasks; it showed a median score of eight (IQR 3) on a Likert scale and 54% of participants (n = 34) gave the tissue feedback a moderate rating. Constructive evaluation demonstrates the improvement of the participants in the training session and the ability of the designed task to distinguish the experienced from the inexperienced surgeon based on the performance score, at task I (transfer of pegs) and II (laparoscopic salpingectomy). There was an improvement in both tasks with a significant increase in score and reduction in time. The study showed that those with a high score at the pre-test recorded a high score post-test, showing a significant pair-wise comparison (Z) and correlation (p) showing a significant statistical significance (p < 0.001). The predictive evaluation demonstrates the beneficiary effect of training four weeks afterward on the practice of surgeons addressed with five questions. It showed an improvement regarding implementation into daily routine, performance of procedure, suturing, shortening of the operative time, and complication management. Conclusions: Virtual reality simulation established high ratings for both realism and training capacity, including clinical relevance, critical relevance, and maintaining training enthusiasm.

Aim: The objective of the study was to evaluate the benefits of robotic-surgery for hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopy for benign indications. A specially prepared telephone-based questionnaire was used postoperatively. Method: All women (n = 155) undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications either by the robotic-assisted procedure (RALH) or conventional laparoscopy (CL) between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2017 at the Department of the Gynecology, University Hospitals, Campus Kiel, Germany, were eligible for analysis. Intra-operative and postoperative parameters affecting the patients’ quality of life were assessed by a telephone-based questionnaire. The latter addressed postoperative pain, limitations of basic hygiene, daily activity, active pursuit of hobbies, sexual intercourse, and days of sick leave. All patients received the questionnaire by post at least three weeks prior to being contacted on the phone. Results: 78% of the contacted patients responded to the questionnaire; 96% (n = 115) of the patients said they would recommend the operation to other patients. Both groups needed 42 days to resume their regular hobbies. In whole 90.8% (n = 108) were total satisfied with the cosmetic result of the abdominal incision; the numbers in the respective groups were 80% (80% n = 36) in RALH and 97.3% (n = 72) in CL. The difference was significant on the Chi-square test (p = 0.002). 5% (n = 7) were dissatisfied with the scar (13.3%; n = 6) in the RALH group, and 1.4% (n = 1) in CL. In all 1.7 % of patients were dissatisfied with the position of the incisions; the respective numbers were 4.4 % (n = 2) in the RALH group and no patient in the CL group. 33% of patients experienced no limitations in regard of sexual intercourse after the operation. The median number of days taken to resume sexual intercourse after the operation was 56 days in the CL group, and 49 days in the RALH group. Nearly 30% (n = 25) were hesitant to resume intercourse. The median operating time was 145 min in the RALH group, which was significantly longer than the 117 min taken in the CL group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The RALH procedure was associated with some minor advantages for the patients according to the results, however it does not have major significant advantages, especially in regard of early restoration of sexual function, while the CL shows shorter operating times and similar limitation. Postoperative counseling of patients should be aligned to their fears and expectations in regard of sexual function.

Recent trials such as INSEMA and SOUND have demonstrated the oncological safety of omitting sentinel lymph node biopsy in selected patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer. However, the implications for adjuvant treatment decisions in routine clinical practice remain unclear. We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study from university breast cancer centers, analyzing 867 patients diagnosed between 2020 and 2024 who met INSEMA criteria: cT1, G1-2, age ≥50 years, clinically node-negative, undergoing breast-conserving surgery. We evaluated the incidence of pathologically positive lymph nodes, frequency of postoperative upgrades in tumor stage or grading, and potential impact on adjuvant therapy decisions, including indications for CDK4/6 inhibitors, secondary axillary surgery or radiation. Sentinel lymph node biopsy revealed occult lymph node metastases in 14.3 % (n = 124) of patients, with a false-negative rate of 10.5 % when micrometastases and isolated tumor cells were excluded. In 11.6 % of cases, nodal positivity led to relevant therapeutic changes, including chemotherapy, axillary radiation, or potential adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy. Moreover, 18.8 % of patients would have required secondary axillary surgery due to postoperative upgrades in tumor characteristics. The number needed to operate to prevent one invasive recurrence with CDK4/6 inhibitors varies significantly based on age and clinical tumor size, ranging from 1:333 (maximum) to 1:111 (minimum). While omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy appears safe in selected patients, our real-world data suggest that axillary staging retains clinical relevance for guiding personalized treatment, unless other prognostic tests like gene expression profiles are used.

Objective: The aim of the study was to perform a systematic assessment of disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival, and morbidity rates after open radical hysterectomy (ORH) and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for early-stage cervical cancer and discuss with experts the consequences of the LACC trial (published by Ramirez et al. in 2018) on clinical routine. Methods: A total of 5428 records were retrieved. After exclusion based on text screening, four records were identified for inclusion. Five experts from three independent large-volume medical centers in Europe were interviewed for their interpretation of the LACC trial. Results: The LACC trial showed a significantly higher risk of disease progression with MIS compared to ORH (HR 3.74, 95% CI 1.63 to 8.58). This was not seen in one epidemiological study and was contradicted by one prospective cohort study reported by Greggi et al. A systematic review by Zhang et al. mentioned a similar DFS for robot-assisted radical hysterectomy (RRH) and LRH. Recurrence rates were significantly higher with MIS compared to ORH in the LACC trial (HR 4.26, 95% CI 1.44 to 12.60). In contrast, four studies presented by Greggi reported no significant difference in recurrence rates between LRH/RRH and ORH, which concurred with the systematic reviews of Zhang and Zhao. The experts mentioned various limitations of the LACC trial and stated that clinicians were obliged to provide patients with detailed information and ensure a shared decision-making process. Conclusions: The surgical treatment of early-stage cervical cancer remains a debated issue. More randomized controlled trials (RCT) will be needed to establish the most suitable treatment for this condition.

Mucinous cystic neoplasms of the pancreas are uncommon and especially their occurrence during pregnancy is an extremely rare event which necessitates an individualized and interdisciplinary management. A 33-year old woman was referred to our department during her third trimester of pregnancy (34th week of gestation) with severe anemia and tarry stools. Based on gastroscopic findings, our interdisciplinary team suspected a gastrointestinal stromal tumor and therefore indicated a prompt delivery via cesarean section completed with an oncological resection of the neoplasm. Histological examination subsequently showed a mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas with no evidence of malignancy. To review the prevalence of mucinous cystic neoplasms and to discuss diagnosis and treatment during pregnancy. Moreover, we critically value the indication of preterm delivery and the oncological procedure in the perspective of outcome for mother and infant. A bleeding gastrointestinal tumor during pregnancy represents a life-threatening risk for mother and infant and requires an immediate interdisciplinary treatment. The urgency and radicality of the therapy should be adapted according to individual findings. As our patient’s tumor was suspected of having a malignant progression, an extensive surgical intervention was necessary.