Accumulation of anthropogenic litter (i.e. garbage; AL) and its ecosystem effects in marine environments are well documented. Rivers receive AL from terrestrial habitats and represent a major source of AL to marine environments, but AL is rarely studied within freshwater ecosystems. Our objectives were to 1) quantify AL density in urban freshwaters, 2) compare AL abundance among freshwater, terrestrial, and marine ecosystems, and 3) characterize the activity and composition of AL biofilms in freshwater habitats. We quantified AL from the Chicago River and Chicago's Lake Michigan shoreline, and found that AL abundance in Chicago freshwater ecosystems was comparable to previously reported data for marine and terrestrial ecosystems, although AL density and composition differed among habitats. To assess microbial interactions with AL, we incubated AL and natural substrates in 3 freshwater ecosystems, quantified biofilm metabolism as gross primary production (GPP) and community respiration (CR), and characterized biofilm bacterial community composition via high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA genes. The main driver of biofilm community composition was incubation location (e.g., river vs pond), but there were some significant differences in biofilm composition and metabolism among substrates. For example, biofilms on organic substrates (cardboard and leaves) had lower GPP than hard substrates (glass, plastic, aluminum and tiles). In addition, bacterial communities on organic substrates were distinct in composition from those on hard substrates, with higher relative abundances of bacteria associated with cellulose decomposition. Finally, we used our results to develop a conceptual diagram designed to unite the study of AL in terrestrial and freshwater environments with the well-established field of marine debris research. We suggest this broad perspective will be useful for future studies which synthesize AL sources, ecosystem effects, and fate across multiple ecosystem types, and will benefit management and reduction of global AL accumulations.

Accumulation of plastic litter is accelerating worldwide. Rivers are a source of microplastic (i.e., particles <5 mm) to oceans, but few measurements of microplastic retention in rivers exist. We adapted spiraling metrics used to measure particulate organic matter transport to quantify microplastic deposition using an outdoor experimental stream. We conducted replicated pulse releases of three common microplastics: polypropylene pellets, polystyrene fragments, and acrylic fibers, repeating measurements using particles with and without biofilms. Depositional velocity (v_dep; mm/s) patterns followed expectations based on density and biofilm ‘stickiness’, where v_dep was highest for fragments, intermediate for fibers, and lowest for pellets, with biofilm colonization generally increasing v_dep. Comparing microplastic v_dep to values for natural particles (e.g., fine and coarse particulate organic matter) showed that particle diameter was positively related to v_dep and negatively related to the ratio of v_dep to settling velocity (i.e., sinking rate in standing water). Thus, microplastic v_dep in rivers can be quantified with the same methods and follows the same patterns as natural particles. These data are the first measurements of microplastic deposition in rivers, and directly inform models of microplastic transport at the landscape scale, making a key contribution to research on the global ecology of plastic waste.

Bidirectional flow between surface water and sediment leads to high accumulation of small and lightweight microplastics in rivers.

Rivers are a major source of microplastic particles (<5 mm) to oceans, but empirical measurements of microplastic movement in freshwater ecosystems are rare. The hard, buoyant surface of microplastic is a novel habitat that selects for unique microbial assemblages in rivers, especially downstream of wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) point sources. We measured microplastic in surface water and benthic habitats 50 m upstream and 50, 305, 1115, and 1900 m downstream of the effluent outfall from a large WWTP in an urban river. We used high-throughput sequencing to measure bacterial assemblages on microplastic from surface and benthic habitats and compared them to bacterial assemblages from seston, water, and sediment. Concentrations of total microplastic and microplastic types (fragment, pellet) in surface water did not change with distance downstream of the WWTP. Thus, microplastic transport showed no net deposition or resuspension. Microplastic concentrations were much higher in the benthic zone than surface water. Benthic deposition appears to be a plastic sink over longer time scales, but subsequent studies are needed to resolve microplastic transport dynamics by particle type, size, and habitat. Composition of microplastic-attached bacterial assemblages differed from that of assemblages in water, seston, and sediment and supports domestic wastewater as a point source of microplastic (e.g., gastrointestinal taxa). Shifts in microplastic assemblages with distance from the WWTP suggest succession toward a ‘stream-like’ bacterial assemblage. Future studies are required to quantify the metabolic capacity of microplastic-associated bacteria. Estimates of transport distance, microplastic storage, and microbial interactions are critical to include lotic ecosystems in accountings of global plastic budgets.

Research on plastics in global ecosystems is rapidly evolving. Oceans have been the primary focus of studies to date, whereas rivers are generally considered little more than conduits of plastics to marine ecosystems. Within a watershed, however, plastics of all sizes are retained, transformed, and even extracted via freshwater use or litter cleanup. As such, plastic litter in terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems is an important but underappreciated component of global plastic pollution. To gain a holistic perspective, we developed a conceptual model that synthesizes all sources, fluxes, and fates for plastics in a watershed, including containment (ie disposed in landfill), non‐containment (ie persists as environmental pollution), mineralization, export to oceans, atmospheric interactions, and freshwater extraction. We used this model of the “plastic cycle” to illustrate which components have received the most scientific attention and to reveal overlooked pathways. Our main objective is for this framework to inform future research, offer a new perspective to adapt management across diverse waste governance scenarios, and improve global models of plastic litter.