Aldo Ramirez-Arellano

Dr. Aldo Ramirez-Arellano

Instituto Politécnico Nacional
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2021 in Sage Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EAElizabeth Acosta-Gonzaga
Elizabeth Acosta-Gonzaga
Aldo Ramirez-ArellanoAldo Ramirez-Arellano
Aldo Ramirez-Arellano
Previous research has proposed a conceptual model of the relationships between motivation, emotions, cognition, and metacognition related to students’ learning performance and validated it in a blended learning context that combines traditional learning with the use of educational technology. This study examined these relationships to test the hypothesis that the levels of some factors in a face-to-face learning environment differ from those in a blended learning context, finding that the conceptual model is valid for both settings. The role of positive emotions was significant in blended learning but not in face-to-face learning. Furthermore, help-seeking and peer learning were relevant only in blended learning. A positive relationship between academic motivations and metacognitive strategies was found in the face-to-face context, whereas one from motivations to metacognitive and cognitive strategies was found in the blended context. Negative emotions were present in both learning settings. This shows that the role of emotions is relevant to students’ perceived success.

18 October 2022 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EAElizabeth Acosta-Gonzaga
Elizabeth Acosta-Gonzaga
Aldo Ramirez-ArellanoAldo Ramirez-Arellano
Aldo Ramirez-Arellano
In higher education, students’ engagement plays an essential role in determining learning success. Several studies have focused on identifying the relationship between engagement and learning achievements. However, comprehensive studies that include engagement, motivation, and scaffolding have yet to be performed. This article introduced a concept of metacognitive and learning engagement based on the frontiers between metacognition and cognition previously established in the literature. A conceptual model including cognitive, behavioural, emotional, scaffolding, and motivation and the two new definitions (metacognitive and learning engagement) was proposed and validated in 220 university students using structural equation modelling. The findings support the conjecture that cognitive engagement is directly influenced by metacognitive engagement. Learning engagement is influenced by cognitive engagement, and all of them are triggered by motivation. Furthermore, scaffolding enhances emotional engagement. Teachers’ support fosters students’ emotions of being enthusiastic, interested in class, joyful in learning activities, and proud of their learning achievements.

16 January 2018 in Journal of Educational Computing Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Aldo Ramirez-ArellanoAldo Ramirez-Arellano
Aldo Ramirez-Arellano
Juan Bory ReyesJuan Bory Reyes
Juan Bory Reyes
LHLuis Manuel Hernández-Simón
Luis Manuel Hernández-Simón
Several studies have focused on identifying the significant behavioral predictors of learning performances in web-based courses by examining the log data variables of learning management systems, including time spent on lectures, the number of assignments submitted, and so forth. However, such studies fail to quantify the impact of emotional, motivational, behavioral, and cognitive–metacognitive factors simultaneously. This research was an attempt to understand the relations between students’ motivation, cognitive–metacognitive strategies, behavior, and learning performance in the context of blended courses in higher education. Then, relevant predictors are used to obtain a model to classify the students’ performance and to identify those who are at risk of failing the course. The authors conducted an empirical study in a higher educational course with 137 Mexican students. Nineteen variables related to emotions, motivation, cognitive–metacognitive strategies, and behavior. Only six were found to be significant. These variables explain approximately 67% of the variance between each student’s overall grade. The model, based on those variables, correctly classifies 96% of the students.

27 July 2018 in Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Aldo Ramirez-ArellanoAldo Ramirez-Arellano
Aldo Ramirez-Arellano
EAElizabeth Acosta-Gonzaga
Elizabeth Acosta-Gonzaga
Juan Bory ReyesJuan Bory Reyes
Juan Bory Reyes
LHLuis Manuel Hernández‐Simón
Luis Manuel Hernández‐Simón

1 February 2019 in Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Aldo Ramirez-ArellanoAldo Ramirez-Arellano
Aldo Ramirez-Arellano
SBSalvador Bermúdez-Gómez
Salvador Bermúdez-Gómez
LHLuis Manuel Hernández-Simón
Luis Manuel Hernández-Simón
Juan Bory ReyesJuan Bory Reyes
Juan Bory Reyes

10 December 2024 in Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MLMingli Lei
Mingli Lei
LLLirong Liu
Lirong Liu
Aldo Ramirez-ArellanoAldo Ramirez-Arellano
Aldo Ramirez-Arellano
JZJie Zhao
Jie Zhao
Kang Hao CheongKang Hao Cheong
Kang Hao Cheong