Parissa Tabrizian

Dr. Parissa Tabrizian

Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 December 2020 in American Journal of Transplantation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PTParissa Tabrizian
Parissa Tabrizian
SFSander S. Florman
Sander S. Florman
MSMyron E. Schwartz
Myron E. Schwartz
The use of anti‐programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD‐1/PD‐L1) checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of cancer has rapidly increased and is approved to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). PD‐1 blockade has been discouraged in transplant candidates and recipients due to reports of severe rejection and graft loss.1‐3 The clinical outcome of patients receiving immunotherapy before transplant, however, remains unknown.

8 September 2024 in Journal of Hepatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PTParissa Tabrizian
Parissa Tabrizian
MHMatthew L. Holzner
Matthew L. Holzner
VAVeeral Ajmera
Veeral Ajmera
AKAmy K. Kim
Amy K. Kim
KZKali Zhou
Kali Zhou
NMNeil Mehta MD
Neil Mehta MD

5 March 2025 in Hepatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Beat MoeckliBeat Moeckli
Beat Moeckli
CWCharles-Henri Wassmer
Charles-Henri Wassmer
SHSofia El Hajji
Sofia El Hajji
RKRohan Kumar
Rohan Kumar
JRJoana Rodrigues Ribeiro
Joana Rodrigues Ribeiro
CTChristian Toso
Christian Toso
Background and Aims: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used in patients with advanced HCC patients awaiting liver transplantation (LT). However, concerns about the risk of posttransplant rejection persist. Approach and Results: We conducted an international retrospective cohort study including 119 HCC patients who received ICIs prior to LT. We analyzed the incidence of allograft rejection, graft loss, and posttransplant recurrence with a particular focus on the washout period between the last ICI dose and LT. In this study, 24 of the 119 (20.2%) patients experienced allograft rejection with a median time to rejection of 9 days (IQR 6–10) post-LT. A linear relationship was observed between shorter washout periods and higher rejection risk. Washout periods <30 days (OR: 21.3, 95% CI: 5.93–103, p<0.001) and between 30 and 50 days (OR: 9.48, 95% CI 2.47–46.8, p=0.002) were significantly associated with higher rejection rates in the univariate analysis compared to the washout period above 50 days. Graft loss as a result of rejection occurred in 6 patients (25%) with rejection. No factors related to grafts were associated with rejection. A longer washout period was not associated with a lower recurrence-free survival posttransplantation at 36 months (71% vs. 67%, p=0.71). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that a washout period longer than 50 days for ICIs before LT appears to be safe with respect to rejection risk. While these results may help guide clinical decision-making, future prospective studies are essential to establish definitive guidelines.

15 September 2023 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CWCharles-Henri Wassmer
Charles-Henri Wassmer
SHSofia El Hajji
Sofia El Hajji
XPXenofon Papazarkadas
Xenofon Papazarkadas
PCPhilippe COMPAGNON
Philippe COMPAGNON
PTParissa Tabrizian
Parissa Tabrizian
CTChristian Toso
Christian Toso
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved the management of patients with intermediate- and advanced-stage HCC, even making some of them potential candidates for liver transplantation. However, acute rejection has been observed after ICI therapy, challenging its safety in transplant settings. We summarize the key basic impact of immune checkpoints on HCC and liver transplantation. We analyze the available case reports and case series on the use of ICI therapy prior to and after liver transplantation. A three-month washout period is desirable between ICI therapy and liver transplantation to reduce the risk of acute rejection. Whenever possible, ICIs should be avoided after liver transplantation, and especially so early after a transplant. Globally, more robust prospective data in the field are required.

10 April 2023 in Liver Transplantation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BTBenjamin V. Tran
Benjamin V. Tran
DMDimitrios Moris
Dimitrios Moris
DMDaniela Markovic
Daniela Markovic
HZHamed Zaribafzadeh
Hamed Zaribafzadeh
RHRicardo Henao
Ricardo Henao
VAVatche G. Agopian
Vatche G. Agopian
HCC recurrence following liver transplantation (LT) is highly morbid and occurs despite strict patient selection criteria. Individualized prediction of post-LT HCC recurrence risk remains an important need. Clinico-radiologic and pathologic data of 4981 patients with HCC undergoing LT from the US Multicenter HCC Transplant Consortium (UMHTC) were analyzed to develop a REcurrent Liver cAncer Prediction ScorE (RELAPSE). Multivariable Fine and Gray competing risk analysis and machine learning algorithms (Random Survival Forest and Classification and Regression Tree models) identified variables to model HCC recurrence. RELAPSE was externally validated in 1160 HCC LT recipients from the European Hepatocellular Cancer Liver Transplant study group. Of 4981 UMHTC patients with HCC undergoing LT, 71.9% were within Milan criteria, 16.1% were initially beyond Milan criteria with 9.4% downstaged before LT, and 12.0% had incidental HCC on explant pathology. Overall and recurrence-free survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 89.7%, 78.6%, and 69.8% and 86.8%, 74.9%, and 66.7%, respectively, with a 5-year incidence of HCC recurrence of 12.5% (median 16 months) and non-HCC mortality of 20.8%. A multivariable model identified maximum alpha-fetoprotein (HR = 1.35 per-log SD, 95% CI,1.22–1.50, p < 0.001), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (HR = 1.16 per-log SD, 95% CI,1.04–1.28, p < 0.006), pathologic maximum tumor diameter (HR = 1.53 per-log SD, 95% CI, 1.35–1.73, p < 0.001), microvascular (HR = 2.37, 95%–CI, 1.87–2.99, p < 0.001) and macrovascular (HR = 3.38, 95% CI, 2.41–4.75, p < 0.001) invasion, and tumor differentiation (moderate HR = 1.75, 95% CI, 1.29–2.37, p < 0.001; poor HR = 2.62, 95% CI, 1.54–3.32, p < 0.001) as independent variables predicting post-LT HCC recurrence (C-statistic = 0.78). Machine learning algorithms incorporating additional covariates improved prediction of recurrence (Random Survival Forest C-statistic = 0.81). Despite significant differences in European Hepatocellular Cancer Liver Transplant recipient radiologic, treatment, and pathologic characteristics, external validation of RELAPSE demonstrated consistent 2- and 5-year recurrence risk discrimination (AUCs 0.77 and 0.75, respectively). We developed and externally validated a RELAPSE score that accurately discriminates post-LT HCC recurrence risk and may allow for individualized post-LT surveillance, immunosuppression modification, and selection of high-risk patients for adjuvant therapies.

28 July 2021 in Gut
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JFJohann von Felden
Johann von Felden
TGTeresa Garcia-Lezana
Teresa Garcia-Lezana
NDNavneet Dogra
Navneet Dogra
EGEdgar Gonzalez-Kozlova
Edgar Gonzalez-Kozlova
MAMehmet Eren Ahsen
Mehmet Eren Ahsen
AVAugusto Villanueva
Augusto Villanueva
Objective Surveillance tools for early cancer detection are suboptimal, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and biomarkers are urgently needed. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have gained increasing scientific interest due to their involvement in tumour initiation and metastasis; however, most extracellular RNA (exRNA) blood-based biomarker studies are limited to annotated genomic regions. Design EVs were isolated with differential ultracentrifugation and integrated nanoscale deterministic lateral displacement arrays (nanoDLD) and quality assessed by electron microscopy, immunoblotting, nanoparticle tracking and deconvolution analysis. Genome-wide sequencing of the largely unexplored small exRNA landscape, including unannotated transcripts, identified and reproducibly quantified small RNA clusters (smRCs). Their key genomic features were delineated across biospecimens and EV isolation techniques in prostate cancer and HCC. Three independent exRNA cancer datasets with a total of 479 samples from 375 patients, including longitudinal samples, were used for this study. Results ExRNA smRCs were dominated by uncharacterised, unannotated small RNA with a consensus sequence of 20 nt. An unannotated 3-smRC signature was significantly overexpressed in plasma exRNA of patients with HCC (p<0.01, n=157). An independent validation in a phase 2 biomarker case–control study revealed 86% sensitivity and 91% specificity for the detection of early HCC from controls at risk (n=209) (area under the receiver operating curve (AUC): 0.87). The 3-smRC signature was independent of alpha-fetoprotein (p<0.0001) and a composite model yielded an increased AUC of 0.93. Conclusion These findings directly lead to the prospect of a minimally invasive, blood-only, operator-independent clinical tool for HCC surveillance, thus highlighting the potential of unannotated smRCs for biomarker research in cancer.