Wooyong Um

Prof. Dr. Wooyong Um

Division of Advanced Nuclear Engineering/Division of Environmental Science and Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang 37673, Korea
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 August 2007 in Advanced Functional Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YSY. Shin
Y. Shin
GFG. E. Fryxell
G. E. Fryxell
Wooyong UmWooyong Um
Wooyong Um
KPK. Parker
K. Parker
SMS. V. Mattigod
S. V. Mattigod
RSR. Skaggs
R. Skaggs

1 June 2016 in International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SCSusan Carroll
Susan Carroll
JCJ. William Carey
J. William Carey
DDDavid Dzombak
David Dzombak
NHNicolas J. Huerta
Nicolas J. Huerta
LLLi Li
Li Li
LZLiwei Zhang
Liwei Zhang
Among the various risks associated with CO2 storage in deep geologic formations, wells are important potential pathways for fluid leaks and groundwater contamination. Injection of CO2 will perturb the storage reservoir and any wells that penetrate the CO2 or pressure footprints are potential pathways for leakage of CO2 and/or reservoir brine. Well leakage is of particular concern for regions with a long history of oil and gas exploration because they are top candidates for geologic CO2 storage sites. This review explores in detail the ability of wells to retain their integrity against leakage with careful examination of the coupled physical and chemical processes involved. Understanding time-dependent leakage is complicated by the changes in fluid flow, solute transport, chemical reactions, and mechanical stresses over decade or longer time frames for site operations and monitoring.Almost all studies of the potential for well leakage have been laboratory based, as there are limited data on field-scale leakage. Laboratory experiments show that CO2 and CO2-saturated brine still react with cement and casing when leakage occurs by diffusion only. The rate of degradation, however, is transport-limited and alteration of cement and casing properties is low. When a leakage path is already present due to cement shrinkage or fracturing, gaps along interfaces (e.g. casing/cement or cement/rock), or casing failures, chemical and mechanical alteration have the potential to decrease or increase leakage risks. Laboratory experiments and numerical simulations have shown that mineral precipitation or closure of strain-induced fractures can seal a leak pathway over time or conversely open pathways depending on flow-rate, chemistry, and the stress state. Experiments with steel/cement and cement/rock interfaces have indicated that protective mechanisms such as metal passivation, chemical alteration, mechanical deformation, and pore clogging can also help mitigate leakage. The specific rate and nature of alteration depend on the cement, brine, and injected fluid compositions. For example, the presence of co-injected gases (e.g. O2, H2S, and SO2) and pozzolan amendments (fly ash) to cement influences the rate and the nature of cement reactions. A more complete understanding of the coupled physical–chemical mechanisms involved with sealing and opening of leakage pathways is needed.An important challenge is to take empirically based chemical, mechanical, and transport models reviewed here and assess leakage risk for carbon storage at the field scale. Field observations that accompany laboratory and modeling studies are critical to validating understanding of leakage risk. Long-term risk at the field scale is an area of active research made difficult by the large variability of material types (cement, geologic material, casing), field conditions (pressure, temperature, gradient in potential, residence time), and leaking fluid composition (CO2, co-injected gases, brine). Of particular interest are the circumstances when sealing and other protective mechanisms are likely to be effective, when they are likely to fail, and the zone of uncertainty between these two extremes

1 March 2004 in Langmuir
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MDMamadou S. Diallo
Mamadou S. Diallo
SCSimone Christie
Simone Christie
PSPirabalini Swaminathan
Pirabalini Swaminathan
LBLajos Balogh
Lajos Balogh
Xiangyang ShiXiangyang Shi
Xiangyang Shi
JJJames H. Johnson
James H. Johnson

13 June 2013 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BRBrian J. Riley
Brian J. Riley
JCJaehun Chun
Jaehun Chun
Wooyong UmWooyong Um
Wooyong Um
WLWilliam C. Lepry
William C. Lepry
JMJosef Matyas
Josef Matyas
MKMercouri G. Kanatzidis
Mercouri G. Kanatzidis

10 May 2011 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Wooyong UmWooyong Um
Wooyong Um
HCHyun-Shik Chang
Hyun-Shik Chang
JIJonathan P. Icenhower
Jonathan P. Icenhower
WLWayne W. Lukens
Wayne W. Lukens
RSR. Jeffrey Serne
R. Jeffrey Serne
SSSteven C. Smith
Steven C. Smith

24 September 2021 in npj Materials Degradation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SWSam A. Walling
Sam A. Walling
Wooyong UmWooyong Um
Wooyong Um
CCClaire L. Corkhill
Claire L. Corkhill
NHNeil C. Hyatt
Neil C. Hyatt
Fenton or Fenton-like oxidation for treatment of organic radioactive wastes is a promising technology with applications to a range of organic wastes. This review details this process; exploring potential challenges, pitfalls and opportunities for industrial usage with radioactive wastes. The application of this process to real radioactive wastes within pilot-plant settings has been documented, with key findings critically assessed in the context of future waste production. Although this oxidation process has not found mainstream success in treatment of radioactive wastes, a lower temperature oxidation system bring certain benefits, specifically for higher volume or problematic organic wastestreams.