Stefano Forte

Dr. Stefano Forte

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 June 2015 in Carcinogenesis
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WGWilliam H. Goodson
William H. Goodson
LLLeroy Lowe
Leroy Lowe
DCDavid O. Carpenter
David O. Carpenter
MGMichael Gilbertson
Michael Gilbertson
AAAbdul Manaf Ali
Abdul Manaf Ali
Zhiwei HuZhiwei Hu
Zhiwei Hu
Lifestyle factors are responsible for a considerable portion of cancer incidence worldwide, but credible estimates from the World Health Organization and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) suggest that the fraction of cancers attributable to toxic environmental exposures is between 7% and 19%. To explore the hypothesis that low-dose exposures to mixtures of chemicals in the environment may be combining to contribute to environmental carcinogenesis, we reviewed 11 hallmark phenotypes of cancer, multiple priority target sites for disruption in each area and prototypical chemical disruptors for all targets, this included dose-response characterizations, evidence of low-dose effects and cross-hallmark effects for all targets and chemicals. In total, 85 examples of chemicals were reviewed for actions on key pathways/mechanisms related to carcinogenesis. Only 15% (13/85) were found to have evidence of a dose-response threshold, whereas 59% (50/85) exerted low-dose effects. No dose-response information was found for the remaining 26% (22/85). Our analysis suggests that the cumulative effects of individual (non-carcinogenic) chemicals acting on different pathways, and a variety of related systems, organs, tissues and cells could plausibly conspire to produce carcinogenic synergies. Additional basic research on carcinogenesis and research focused on low-dose effects of chemical mixtures needs to be rigorously pursued before the merits of this hypothesis can be further advanced. However, the structure of the World Health Organization International Programme on Chemical Safety ‘Mode of Action’ framework should be revisited as it has inherent weaknesses that are not fully aligned with our current understanding of cancer biology.

19 June 2015 in Carcinogenesis
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SLSabine Langie
Sabine Langie
GKGudrun Koppen
Gudrun Koppen
DDDaniel Desaulniers
Daniel Desaulniers
FAFahd Al-Mulla
Fahd Al-Mulla
RARabeah Al-Temaimi
Rabeah Al-Temaimi
ACAndrew Collins
Andrew Collins
Genome instability is a prerequisite for the development of cancer. It occurs when genome maintenance systems fail to safeguard the genome’s integrity, whether as a consequence of inherited defects or induced via exposure to environmental agents (chemicals, biological agents and radiation). Thus, genome instability can be defined as an enhanced tendency for the genome to acquire mutations; ranging from changes to the nucleotide sequence to chromosomal gain, rearrangements or loss. This review raises the hypothesis that in addition to known human carcinogens, exposure to low dose of other chemicals present in our modern society could contribute to carcinogenesis by indirectly affecting genome stability. The selected chemicals with their mechanisms of action proposed to indirectly contribute to genome instability are: heavy metals (DNA repair, epigenetic modification, DNA damage signaling, telomere length), acrylamide (DNA repair, chromosome segregation), bisphenol A (epigenetic modification, DNA damage signaling, mitochondrial function, chromosome segregation), benomyl (chromosome segregation), quinones (epigenetic modification) and nano-sized particles (epigenetic pathways, mitochondrial function, chromosome segregation, telomere length). The purpose of this review is to describe the crucial aspects of genome instability, to outline the ways in which environmental chemicals can affect this cancer hallmark and to identify candidate chemicals for further study. The overall aim is to make scientists aware of the increasing need to unravel the underlying mechanisms via which chemicals at low doses can induce genome instability and thus promote carcinogenesis.

19 June 2015 in Carcinogenesis
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PTPatricia A. Thompson
Patricia A. Thompson
MKMahin Khatami
Mahin Khatami
CBCarolyn J. Baglole
Carolyn J. Baglole
JSJun Sun
Jun Sun
SHShelley Anne Harris
Shelley Anne Harris
WBWilliam H Bisson
William H Bisson
An emerging area in environmental toxicology is the role that chemicals and chemical mixtures have on the cells of the human immune system. This is an important area of research that has been most widely pursued in relation to autoimmune diseases and allergy/asthma as opposed to cancer causation. This is despite the well-recognized role that innate and adaptive immunity play as essential factors in tumorigenesis. Here, we review the role that the innate immune cells of inflammatory responses play in tumorigenesis. Focus is placed on the molecules and pathways that have been mechanistically linked with tumor-associated inflammation. Within the context of chemically induced disturbances in immune function as co-factors in carcinogenesis, the evidence linking environmental toxicant exposures with perturbation in the balance between pro- and anti-inflammatory responses is reviewed. Reported effects of bisphenol A, atrazine, phthalates and other common toxicants on molecular and cellular targets involved in tumor-associated inflammation (e.g. cyclooxygenase/prostaglandin E2, nuclear factor kappa B, nitric oxide synthesis, cytokines and chemokines) are presented as example chemically mediated target molecule perturbations relevant to cancer. Commentary on areas of additional research including the need for innovation and integration of systems biology approaches to the study of environmental exposures and cancer causation are presented.

5 November 2012 in Oncogene
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
APA Pagliuca
A Pagliuca
CVC Valvo
C Valvo
EFE Fabrizi
E Fabrizi
SMSimona di martino
Simona di martino
MBMauro Biffoni
Mauro Biffoni
LRLucia Ricci-Vitiani
Lucia Ricci-Vitiani

21 April 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GNGiuseppe Nocito
Giuseppe Nocito
GCGiovanna Calabrese
Giovanna Calabrese
Stefano ForteStefano Forte
Stefano Forte
SPSalvatore Petralia
Salvatore Petralia
CPCaterina Puglisi
Caterina Puglisi
SCSabrina Conoci
Sabrina Conoci
Carbon Dots (CDs) are the latest members of carbon-based nanomaterials, which since their discovery have attracted notable attention due to their chemical and mechanical properties, brilliant fluorescence, high photostability, and good biocompatibility. Together with the ease and affordable preparation costs, these intrinsic features make CDs the most promising nanomaterials for multiple applications in the biological field, such as bioimaging, biotherapy, and gene/drug delivery. This review will illustrate the most recent applications of CDs in the biomedical field, focusing on their biocompatibility, fluorescence, low cytotoxicity, cellular uptake, and theranostic properties to highlight above all their usefulness as a promising tool for cancer diagnosis and therapy.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GCGiovanna Calabrese
Giovanna Calabrese
GLGiovanna De Luca
Giovanna De Luca
GNGiuseppe Nocito
Giuseppe Nocito
Maria Giovanna RizzoMaria Giovanna Rizzo
Maria Giovanna Rizzo
SLSofia Paola Lombardo
Sofia Paola Lombardo
SCSabrina Conoci
Sabrina Conoci
Brain tumors are particularly aggressive and represent a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in adults and children, affecting the global population and being responsible for 2.6% of all cancer deaths (as well as 30% of those in children and 20% in young adults). The blood-brain barrier (BBB) excludes almost 100% of the drugs targeting brain neoplasms, representing one of the most significant challenges to current brain cancer therapy. In the last decades, carbon dots have increasingly played the role of drug delivery systems with theranostic applications against cancer, thanks to their bright photoluminescence, solubility in bodily fluids, chemical stability, and biocompatibility. After a summary outlining brain tumors and the current drug delivery strategies devised in their therapeutic management, this review explores the most recent literature about the advances and open challenges in the employment of carbon dots as both diagnostic and therapeutic agents in the treatment of brain cancers, together with the strategies devised to allow them to cross the BBB effectively.