Jarmo Holopainen

Prof. Jarmo Holopainen

Emeritus Professor
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

43Years (1984-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2010 in Trends in Plant Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Jarmo HolopainenJarmo Holopainen
Jarmo Holopainen
JGJonathan Gershenzon
Jonathan Gershenzon

13 October 2010 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AVAnnele Virtanen
Annele Virtanen
JJJorma Joutsensaari
Jorma Joutsensaari
TKThomas Koop
Thomas Koop
JKJonna Kannosto
Jonna Kannosto
PYPasi Yli-Pirilä
Pasi Yli-Pirilä
ALAri Laaksonen
Ari Laaksonen

1 November 2004 in Trends in Plant Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Jarmo HolopainenJarmo Holopainen
Jarmo Holopainen

2 October 2018 in Frontiers in Plant Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jarmo HolopainenJarmo Holopainen
Jarmo Holopainen
VVVirpi Virjamo
Virpi Virjamo
RGRajendra P. Ghimire
Rajendra P. Ghimire
James D. BlandeJames D. Blande
James D. Blande
RJRiitta Julkunen-Tiitto
Riitta Julkunen-Tiitto
MKMinna Kivimäenpää
Minna Kivimäenpää
Plant secondary compounds (PSCs), also called secondary metabolites, have high chemical and structural diversity and appear as non-volatile or volatile compounds. These compounds may have evolved to have specific physiological and ecological functions in the adaptation of plants to their growth environment. PSCs are produced by several metabolic pathways and many PSCs are specific for a few plant genera or families. In forest ecosystems, full-grown trees constitute the majority of plant biomass and are thus capable of producing significant amounts of PSCs. We summarize older literature and review recent progress in understanding the effects of abiotic and biotic factors on PSC production of forest trees and PSC behavior in forest ecosystems. The roles of different PSCs under stress and their important role in protecting plants against abiotic and biotic factors are also discussed. There was strong evidence that major climate change factors, CO2 and warming, have contradictory effects on the main PSC groups. CO2 increases phenolic compounds in foliage, but limits terpenoids in foliage and emissions. Warming decreases phenolic compounds in foliage but increases terpenoids in foliage and emissions. Other abiotic stresses have more variable effects. PSCs may help trees to adapt to a changing climate and to pressure from current and invasive pests and pathogens. Indirect adaptation comes via the effects of PSCs on soil chemistry and nutrient cycling, the formation of cloud condensation nuclei from tree volatiles and by CO2 sequestration into PSCs in the wood of living and dead forest trees.

1 June 2009 in Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JYJoshua S. Yuan
Joshua S. Yuan
SHSari J. Himanen
Sari J. Himanen
Jarmo HolopainenJarmo Holopainen
Jarmo Holopainen
FCFeng Chen
Feng Chen
CSC. Neal Stewart
C. Neal Stewart

16 April 2014 in Plant, Cell & Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
James D. BlandeJames D. Blande
James D. Blande
Jarmo HolopainenJarmo Holopainen
Jarmo Holopainen
Ülo NiinemetsÜlo Niinemets
Ülo Niinemets
Plants emit a plethora of volatile organic compounds, which provide detailed information on the physiological condition of emitters. Volatiles induced by herbivore feeding are among the best studied plant responses to stress and may constitute an informative message to the surrounding community and further function in plant defence processes. However, under natural conditions, plants are potentially exposed to multiple concurrent stresses with complex effects on the volatile emissions. Atmospheric pollutants are an important facet of the abiotic environment and can impinge on a plant's volatile‐mediated defences in multiple ways at multiple temporal scales. They can exert changes in volatile emissions through oxidative stress, as is the case with ozone pollution. The pollutants, in particular, ozone, nitrogen oxides and hydroxyl radicals, also react with volatiles in the atmosphere. These reactions result in volatile breakdown products, which may themselves be perceived by community members as informative signals. In this review, we demonstrate the complex interplay among stresses, emitted signals, and modification in signal strength and composition by the atmosphere, collectively determining the responses of the biotic community to elicited signals.