Jordi Corominas

Dr. Jordi Corominas

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

32Years (1995-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2008 in Engineering Geology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RFRobin Fell
Robin Fell
JCJordi Corominas
Jordi Corominas
CBChristophe Bonnard
Christophe Bonnard
LCLeonardo Cascini
Leonardo Cascini
ELEric Leroi
Eric Leroi
WSWilliam Z. Savage
William Z. Savage

24 November 2013 in Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JCJordi Corominas
Jordi Corominas
CWC. van Westen
C. van Westen
Paolo FrattiniPaolo Frattini
Paolo Frattini
LCL. Cascini
L. Cascini
JMJ.-P. Malet
J.-P. Malet
JSJ. T. Smith
J. T. Smith
This paper presents recommended methodologies for the quantitative analysis of landslide hazard, vulnerability and risk at different spatial scales (site-specific, local, regional and national), as well as for the verification and validation of the results. The methodologies described focus on the evaluation of the probabilities of occurrence of different landslide types with certain characteristics. Methods used to determine the spatial distribution of landslide intensity, the characterisation of the elements at risk, the assessment of the potential degree of damage and the quantification of the vulnerability of the elements at risk, and those used to perform the quantitative risk analysis are also described. The paper is intended for use by scientists and practising engineers, geologists and other landslide experts.

8 May 1996 in Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JCJordi Corominas
Jordi Corominas
The relations between the angle of reach (fahrböschung) and other indexes expressing the mobility of landslides and vertical drop, horizontal reach, and volume of landslide mass have been analyzed by means of simplified plots and regression equations. Results for 204 landslides of all sizes show that whatever the mechanism of motion, all kinds of landslides experience a continuous reduction of the angle of reach with volume increase. This reduction starts from the smallest sizes. Scattering in this relation is mostly due to mechanisms of motion and to both obstacles and topographic constraints on the path. This synthesis indicates that small landslides (less than 0.5 × 106 m3), in relative terms, display excesses of travel distance similar to large landslides. Since most small landslides are not expected to develop any change in the mechanism of progression while moving, the decrease in the reach angle with volume suggests that scale effects should be taken into account. The angle of reach is found to be a proper indicator of the relative mobility of landslides and is not dependent on the height of fall. Key words: mass wasting, landslides, reach angle, runout distance, rock avalanches, shallow landslides.

1 December 2008 in Engineering Geology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RFRobin Fell
Robin Fell
JCJordi Corominas
Jordi Corominas
CBChristophe Bonnard
Christophe Bonnard
LCLeonardo Cascini
Leonardo Cascini
ELEric Leroi
Eric Leroi
WSWilliam Z. Savage
William Z. Savage

1 February 2000 in Engineering Geology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JGJosep A Gili
Josep A Gili
JCJordi Corominas
Jordi Corominas
JRJoan Rius
Joan Rius

31 October 2001 in Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CBCristina Baeza
Cristina Baeza
JCJordi Corominas
Jordi Corominas