Jennifer L Taylor

Prof. Jennifer L Taylor

National Jewish Health
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 September 2023 in The Lancet
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Jennifer L TaylorJennifer L Taylor
Jennifer L Taylor
PRPaul D Robinson
Paul D Robinson
MSMichal Shteinberg
Michal Shteinberg
DDDamian G Downey
Damian G Downey

1 February 2021 in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MGMatthias Griese
Matthias Griese
SCStefano Costa
Stefano Costa
RLRachel W. Linnemann
Rachel W. Linnemann
MMMarcus Mall
Marcus Mall
EMEdward F. McKone
Edward F. McKone
CDCori L. Daines
Cori L. Daines

1 July 2023 in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JGJennifer L. Goralski
Jennifer L. Goralski
JHJordana E. Hoppe
Jordana E. Hoppe
MMMarcus Mall
Marcus Mall
SMSusanna A. McColley
Susanna A. McColley
EMEdward McKone
Edward McKone
MRMargaret Rosenfeld
Margaret Rosenfeld
Rationale: Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) has been shown to be safe and effective in people with cystic fibrosis (CF) aged ≥6 years with at least one F508del-CFTR allele but has not been studied in younger children. Objectives: To evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy of ELX/TEZ/IVA in children with CF aged 2–5 years. Methods: In this phase 3, open-label, two-part study (parts A and B), children weighing <14 kg (on Day 1) received ELX 80 mg once daily (qd), TEZ 40 mg qd, and IVA 60 mg each morning and 59.5 mg each evening; children weighing ≥14 kg received ELX 100 mg qd, TEZ 50 mg qd, and IVA 75 mg every 12 hours. Measurements and Main Results: The primary endpoints for part A (15-d treatment period) were pharmacokinetics and safety and tolerability. For part B (24-wk treatment period), the primary endpoint was safety and tolerability; secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics and absolute changes from baseline in sweat chloride concentration and lung clearance index2.5 (LCI2.5, defined as the number of lung turnovers required to reduce the end tidal N2 concentration to 2.5% of its starting value) through Week 24. Analysis of pharmacokinetic data from 18 children enrolled in part A confirmed the appropriateness of the part B dosing regimen. In part B, 75 children (F508del/minimal function genotypes, n = 52; F508del/F508del genotype, n = 23) were enrolled and dosed. Seventy-four children (98.7%) had adverse events, which were all mild (62.7%) or moderate (36.0%) in severity. The most common adverse events were cough, fever, and rhinorrhea. Decreases in sweat chloride concentration (−57.9 mmol/L; 95% confidence interval [CI], −61.3 to −54.6; n = 69) and LCI2.5 (−0.83 U; 95% CI, −1.01 to −0.66; n = 50) were observed from baseline through Week 24. Mean body mass index was within the normal range at baseline and remained stable at Week 24. Conclusions: In this open-label study in children 2–5 years of age, ELX/TEZ/IVA treatment was generally safe and well tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with that observed in older age groups, and led to clinically meaningful reductions in sweat chloride concentration and LCI2.5. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04537793).


20 March 2020 in European Respiratory Review
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMichal Shteinberg
Michal Shteinberg
Jennifer L TaylorJennifer L Taylor
Jennifer L Taylor
Drug compounds that augment the production and activity of the cystic fibrosis (CF) transmembrane regulator (CFTR) have revolutionised CF care. Many adults and some children with CF suffer advanced and severe lung disease or await lung transplantation. While the hope is that these drug compounds will prevent lung damage when started early in life, there is an ongoing need to care for people with advanced lung disease. The focus of this review is the accumulating data from clinical trials and case series regarding the benefits of CFTR modulator therapy in people with advanced pulmonary disease. We address the impact of treatment with ivacaftor, lumacaftor/ivacaftor, tezacaftor/ivacaftor and elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor on lung function, pulmonary exacerbations, nutrition and quality of life. Adverse events of the different CFTR modulators, as well as the potential for drug–drug interactions, are discussed.

9 November 2023 in European Respiratory Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CDCori L. Daines
Cori L. Daines
ETElizabeth Tullis
Elizabeth Tullis
SCStefano Costa
Stefano Costa
RLRachel Linnemann
Rachel Linnemann
MMMarcus Mall
Marcus Mall
MGMatthias Griese
Matthias Griese
Background: In two pivotal phase 3 trials, up to 24 weeks of treatment with elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) was efficacious and safe in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) ≥12 years of age who have at least oneF508delallele. The aim of this study is to assess long-term safety and efficacy of ELX/TEZ/IVA in these patients.Methods: In this phase 3, open-label, single-arm extension study, participants withF508del–minimal function (from a 24-week parent study; n=399) orF508del–F508del(from a 4-week parent study; n=107) genotypes receive ELX/TEZ/IVA at the same dose (ELX 200 mg once daily, TEZ 100 mg once daily and IVA 150 mg every 12 h). The primary end-point is safety and tolerability. A prespecified interim analysis was conducted when the last participant reached the Week 144 visit.Results: At the Week 144 interim analysis, mean duration of exposure to ELX/TEZ/IVA in the extension study was 151.1 weeks. Exposure-adjusted rates of adverse events (AEs) (586.6 events per 100 participant-years) and serious AEs (22.4 events per 100 participant-years) were lower than in the ELX/TEZ/IVA treatment group in the 24-week parent study (1096.0 and 36.9 events per 100 participant-years, respectively); most participants had AEs classified as mild (16.4% of participants) or moderate (60.3% of participants) in severity. 14 participants (2.8%) had AEs that led to treatment discontinuation. Following initiation of ELX/TEZ/IVA, participants had increases in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) percentage predicted, Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised respiratory domain score and body mass index, and had decreases in sweat chloride concentration and pulmonary exacerbation rates that were maintained over the interim analysis period. The mean annualised rate of change in FEV1% pred was +0.07 (95% CI −0.12–0.26) percentage points among the participants.Conclusions: ELX/TEZ/IVA was generally safe and well tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with the 24-week parent study. Participants had sustained improvements in lung function, respiratory symptoms, CF transmembrane conductance regulator function, pulmonary exacerbation rates and nutritional status. These results support the favourable safety profile and durable, disease-modifying clinical benefits of ELX/TEZ/IVA.