Background: Early postoperative mobilization is essential for orthogeriatric patients. The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is widely used to evaluate nutritional status. This study sought to investigate the predictive value of PNI for early postoperative mobility in patients with pertrochanteric femur fractures. Materials and methods: This study included 156 geriatric patients with pertrochanteric femur fractures treated with TFN-Advance™ (DePuy Synthes, Raynham, MA, USA). Mobility was evaluated on the third postoperative day and by discharge. Stepwise logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association significance of PNI with postoperative mobility together with comorbidities. The optimal PNI cut-off value for mobility was analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: Three days postoperatively, PNI was an independent predictor of mobility (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.07–1.23, p < 0.01). By discharge, it was found that PNI (OR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.08–1.30, p < 0.01) and dementia (OR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.07–0.40, p < 0.001) were significant predictors. PNI correlated weakly with age (r = −0.27, p < 0.001). The PNI cut-off value for mobility on the third postoperative day was 38.1 (specificity = 78.5%, sensitivity = 63.6%). Conclusions: Our findings indicate that PNI is an independent predictor of early postoperative mobility in geriatric patients with pertrochanteric femur fractures treated with TFNA™.

Background: Due to an aging society, more and more surgeons are confronted with fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFPs). The aim of treatment of such patients should be the quickest possible mobilization with full weight-bearing. Up to now however, there are no data on loading of the lower extremities in patients suffering FFPs. We hypothesized to find differences in loading of the lower limbs. Methods: 22 patients with a mean age of 84.1 years were included. During gait analysis with insole-force sensors, loading on the lower extremities was recorded during early mobilization after index fracture. Results: Especially the average peak force showed differences in loading, as the affected limb was loaded significantly less {59.78% (SD ± 16.15%) of the bodyweight vs. 73.22% (SD ± 14.84%) (p = <0.001, effect size r = 0.58)}. Furthermore, differences in loading in between the fracture patterns of FFPs were observed. Conclusion: This study shows that it is possible to reliably detect the extremity load, with the help of an insole device, in patients presenting with fragility fractures of the pelvis. There is great potential to improve the choice and time of treatment with insole-force sensors in FFPs in future.

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate whether gait patterns of patients with fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) comply with the grade of fracture instability, defined by radiological patterns. Patients and methods: This prospective, single-center, observational study included 39 patients with an FFP. Gait analysis was performed with a wearable insole force sensor (Loadsol® by Novel, Munich, Germany) 4–7 days after admission. Patients were divided in two groups: Group A included FFP type 1 fractures, which affect the anterior pelvic ring only, Group B contained FFP type 2–4 fractures with an involvement of the posterior pelvic ring. Primary outcome parameter was the FTI ratio (force–time integral (N*s)). Results: The mean age was 85.08 years (SD ± 6.45), 94.9% (37/39) of the patients were female. The most common fracture type was an FFP 2b (64.1%, 25/39). Group A showed a significantly higher FTI ratio (45.12%, SD ± 4.19%) than Group B (38.45%, SD ± 5.97%, p = 0.002). Further, a significant correlation of the FTI ratio and the average (r = 0.570, p < 0.001) and maximum (r = 0.394, p = 0.013) peak force was observed. Conclusion: The gait pattern of patients with an FFP type 2–4 was more imbalanced than of patients with an FFP type 1 fracture. These findings match with the radiological classification of FFP, which indicates higher instability, when the posterior pelvis is affected. Gait analysis might offer earlier functional diagnostics and may accelerate the treatment decision with shorter periods of immobility in future. Especially in cross-border cases, early gait analysis could be beneficial to clarify the indication for or against surgery.

The incidence of fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFPs) is currently rising. Surgical treatment, which is performed using sacroiliac screws, is complicated by compromised bone quality, oftentimes resulting in implant failure. The iFuse implant system aims to improve attachment and durability with promising results for sacroiliac dysfunction, though data for its feasibility on FFPs are rare. Consequently, this study aims to evaluate the feasibility of the iFuse for FFPs. A total of 10 patients with FFPs were treated with the iFuse in this study. Pre- and postoperatively, both mobility using an established insole force sensor for an inpatient gait analysis and general well-being and pain using questionnaires were evaluated. When comparing pre- and postoperative findings, this study demonstrated a significant increase in the average (8.14%) and maximum (9.4%) loading (p < 0.001), a reduction in pain, as measured by the visual analog scale (VAS), from 4.60 to 2.80 at rest (p = 0.011) and from 7.00 to 4.40 during movement (p = 0.008), an increase in the Barthel Index by 20 points (p < 0.001) and an increase in the Parker Mobility Score by 2.00 points (p = 0.011). All this contributes to the possibility of early postoperative mobilization and improved general well-being, ultimately preventing the late consequences of postoperative immobilization and maintaining patients autonomy and contentment.

Introduction: Periprosthetic distal femur fractures are often considered more complex and morbid than native distal femur fractures, yet few studies directly compare them. This study aimed to compare patient characteristics, treatment strategies, and early complications between native and periprosthetic distal femur fractures using the Lewis–Rorabeck classification. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 152 patients treated surgically for distal femur fractures at a level I trauma center. Cases included native fractures ( n = 90) and periprosthetic distal femur fractures ( n = 62), further divided into Lewis–Rorabeck Type I/II ( n = 49) and Type III ( n = 13). Demographics, comorbidities, surgical details, and in-hospital complications were assessed. We conducted a multivariate analysis comparing native fractures with Lewis–Rorabeck Type I/II fractures, as well as comparing Type I/II with Type III fractures. Results: Patients with periprosthetic fractures were older and had higher BMI than those with native fractures ( p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed no significant differences in surgery duration, mortality, mobility at discharge, transfusion needs, or revision rates between native distal femur fractures (AO/OTA Type A) and Lewis–Rorabeck Type I/II. The complication rate was significantly lower in the periprosthetic group ( p = 0.029). Lewis–Rorabeck Type III fractures showed significantly longer time to surgery ( p = 0.015) and revision surgery was performed more frequently compared to Lewis–Rorabeck Type I/II fractures. However, no differences were observed in early postoperative complications, mobility at discharge, or length of hospital stay. Conclusion: This study directly compares periprosthetic distal femur fractures stratified by implant stability to native distal femur fractures. The findings challenge the perception that periprosthetic fractures are universally more difficult to treat. Periprosthetic fractures achieve results comparable to native fractures. The increased complexity of Lewis–Rorabeck Type III fractures is reflected in prolonged time to surgery and an increased need for revision surgery.