The first antibiotic-producing actinomycete (Streptomyces antibioticus) was described by Waksman and Woodruff in 1940. This discovery initiated the “actinomycetes era”, in which several species were identified and demonstrated to be a great source of bioactive compounds. However, the remarkable group of microorganisms and their potential for the production of bioactive agents were only partially exploited. This is caused by the fact that the growth of many actinomycetes cannot be reproduced on artificial media at laboratory conditions. In addition, sequencing, genome mining and bioactivity screening disclosed that numerous biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs), encoded in actinomycetes genomes are not expressed and thus, the respective potential products remain uncharacterized. Therefore, a lot of effort was put into the development of technologies that facilitate the access to actinomycetes genomes and activation of their biosynthetic pathways. In this review, we mainly focus on molecular tools and methods for genetic engineering of actinomycetes that have emerged in the field in the past five years (2015–2020). In addition, we highlight examples of successful application of the recently developed technologies in genetic engineering of actinomycetes for activation and/or improvement of the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites.

Tobramycin is a broad-spectrum aminoglycoside antibiotic agent. The compound is obtained from the base-catalyzed hydrolysis of carbamoyltobramycin (CTB), which is naturally produced by the actinomycete Streptoalloteichus tenebrarius. However, the strain uses the same precursors to synthesize several structurally related aminoglycosides. Consequently, the production yields of tobramycin are low, and the compound’s purification is very challenging, costly, and time-consuming. In this study, the production of the main undesired product, apramycin, in the industrial isolate Streptoalloteichus tenebrarius 2444 was decreased by applying the fermentation media M10 and M11, which contained high concentrations of starch and dextrin. Furthermore, the strain was genetically engineered by the inactivation of the aprK gene (∆aprK), resulting in the abolishment of apramycin biosynthesis. In the next step of strain development, an additional copy of the tobramycin biosynthetic gene cluster (BGC) was introduced into the ∆aprK mutant. Fermentation by the engineered strain (∆aprK_1-17L) in M11 medium resulted in a 3- to 4-fold higher production than fermentation by the precursor strain (∆aprK). The phenotypic stability of the mutant without selection pressure was validated. The use of the engineered S. tenebrarius 2444 facilitates a step-saving, efficient, and, thus, more sustainable production of the valuable compound tobramycin on an industrial scale.

Actinomycetes are important producers of valuable natural products that are applied in medicine or industry. The enzymes necessary for the synthesis of those compounds are encoded in biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) in the genome. However, the discovery of new natural products or the improvement of production levels can be hindered by difficulties in genetic manipulation, since standard methods often do not or not efficiently work in actinomycetes. One possible explanation for this could be the presence of nucleic acid defense systems such as CRISPR-Cas. Even though there is a lot of research published about CRISPR-Cas systems in general, the knowledge about the function of CRISPR-Cas in actinomycetes is very limited. Based on sequence data it is known that CRISPR-Cas systems occur in around half of all sequenced actinobacterial genomes. Moreover, in silico analyses of those systems have led to the discovery of new subtypes. The few examples of experimental evidence of CRISPR-Cas activity in vivo or in vitro, however, point to some special features, regarding crRNA maturation or life-cycle dependent CRISPR-Cas activity. This short review draws attention to this neglected research area and highlights the available data about CRISPR-Cas in actinomycetes.