Purpose: One of the biggest challenges in the health sector is that of costs compared to economic resources and the quality of services. Hospitals register a progressive increase in expenditure due to the aging of the population. In fact, hip and knee arthroplasty surgery are mainly due to primary osteoarthritis that affects the elderly population. This study was carried out with the aim of analysing the introduction of the fast track surgery protocol, through the lean Six Sigma, on patients undergoing knee and hip prosthetic replacement surgery. The goal was to improve the arthroplasty surgery process by reducing the average length of stay (LOA) and hospital costsDesign/methodology/approach: Lean Six Sigma was applied to evaluate the arthroplasty surgery process through the DMAIC cycle (define, measure, analyse, improve and control) and the lean tools (value stream map), adopted to analyse the new protocol and improve process performance. The dataset consisted of two samples of patients: 54 patients before the introduction of the protocol and 111 patients after the improvement. Clinical and demographic variables were collected for each patient (gender, age, allergies, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases and American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score).Findings: The results showed a 12.70% statistically significant decrease in LOS from an overall average of 8.72 to 7.61 days. Women patients without allergies, with a low ASA score not suffering from diabetes and cardiovascular disease showed a significant a reduction in hospital days with the implementation of the FTS protocol. Only the age variable was not statistically significant.Originality/value: The introduction of the FTS in the orthopaedic field, analysed through the LSS, demonstrated to reduce LOS and, consequently, costs. For each individual patient, there was an economic saving of € 445.85. Since our study takes into consideration a dataset of 111 patients post-FTS, the overall economic saving brought by this study amounts to €49,489.35.

The purpose of this study is to use Health Technology Assessment (HTA) through the Six Sigma (SS) and DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyse, Improve, Control) problem-solving strategies for comparing cemented and uncemented prostheses in terms of the costs incurred for Total hip arthroplasty (THA) and the length of hospital stay (LOS). Multinomial logistic regression analysis for modelling the data was also performed. Quantitative parameters extracted from gait analysis, electromyography and computed tomography images were used to compare the approaches, but the analysis did not show statistical significance. The variables regarding costs were studied with the Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests. No statistically significant difference between cemented and uncemented prosthesis for the total cost of LOS was found, but the cost of the surgeon had an influence on the overall expenses, affecting the cemented prosthetic approach. The material costs of surgery for the uncemented prosthesis and the cost of theatre of surgery for the cemented prosthesis were the most influential. Multinomial logistic regression identified the Vastus Lateralis variable as statistically significant. The overall accuracy of the model is 93.0%. The use of SS and DMAIC cycle as tools of HTA proved that the cemented and uncemented approaches for THA have similar costs and LOSy.

Squamous cell carcinoma represents the most common cancer affecting the oral cavity. At the University of Naples “Federico II”, two different antibiotic protocols were used in patients undergoing oral mucosa cancer surgery from 2006 to 2018. From 2011, there was a shift; the combination of Cefazolin plus Clindamycin as a postoperative prophylactic protocol was chosen. In this paper, a health technology assessment (HTA) is performed by using the Six Sigma and DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyse, Improve, Control) cycle in order to compare the performance of the antibiotic protocols according to the length of hospital stay (LOS). The data (13 variables) of two groups were collected and analysed; overall, 136 patients were involved. The American Society of Anaesthesiologist score, use of lymphadenectomy or tracheotomy and the presence of infections influenced LOS significantly (p-value < 0.05) in both groups. Then, the groups were compared: the overall difference between LOS of the groups was not statistically significant, but some insights were provided by comparing the LOS of the groups according to each variable. In conclusion, in light of the insights provided by this study regarding the comparison of two antibiotic protocols, the utilization of DMAIC cycle and Six Sigma tools to perform HTA studies could be considered in future research.