Eunkyo Park

Ms. Eunkyo Park

Ewha Womans University College of Medicine
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 November 2020 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMi-Hyun Kim
Mi-Hyun Kim
KYKyung Eun Yun
Kyung Eun Yun
JKJimin Kim
Jimin Kim
EPEunkyo Park
Eunkyo Park
YCYoosoo Chang
Yoosoo Chang
HKHan-Na Kim
Han-Na Kim
Although obesity is associated with numerous diseases, the risks of disease may depend on metabolic health. Associations between the gut microbiota, obesity, and metabolic syndrome have been reported, but differences in microbiomes according to metabolic health in the obese population have not been explored in previous studies. Here, we investigated the composition of gut microbiota according to metabolic health status in obese and overweight subjects. A total of 747 overweight or obese adults were categorized by metabolic health status, and their fecal microbiota were profiled using 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. We classified these adults into a metabolically healthy group (MH, N = 317) without any components of metabolic syndrome or a metabolically unhealthy group (MU, N = 430) defined as having at least one metabolic abnormality. The phylogenetic and non-phylogenetic alpha diversity for gut microbiota were lower in the MU group than the MH group, and there were significant differences in gut microbiota bacterial composition between the two groups. We found that the genus Oscillospira and the family Coriobacteriaceae were associated with good metabolic health in the overweight and obese populations. This is the first report to describe gut microbial diversity and composition in metabolically healthy and unhealthy overweight and obese individuals. Modulation of the gut microbiome may help prevent metabolic abnormalities in the obese population.

1 January 2013 in Journal of Functional Foods
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EPEunkyo Park
Eunkyo Park
SLSeung-Min Lee
Seung-Min Lee
JLJung Eun Lee
Jung Eun Lee
JKJung-Hyun Kim
Jung-Hyun Kim

11 January 2019 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WYWon Jae Yoon
Won Jae Yoon
HKHan-Na Kim
Han-Na Kim
EPEunkyo Park
Eunkyo Park
SRSeungho Ryu
Seungho Ryu
YCYoosoo Chang
Yoosoo Chang
SYSun Young Yi
Sun Young Yi
Cholecystectomy alters the bile flow into the intestine and the enterohepatic circulation of the bile acids; this may affect the gut microbiota. We assessed the gut microbiota composition of patients who had undergone cholecystectomy and compared with those who had not. From a cohort of 1463 adult participants who underwent comprehensive health screening examinations, 27 subjects who had undergone cholecystectomy (cholecystectomy group) and 81 age- and sex-matched subjects who had not (control group) were selected. Clinical parameters were collected and compared. Microbial composition was determined by 16S rRNA gene sequencing of DNA extracted from fecal samples. We evaluated differences in the overall microbial composition and in the abundance of taxa. The two groups were comparable with respect to clinical characteristics and laboratory results. The actual number of taxa observed in a sample (observed features) was significantly lower in the cholecystectomy group than in the control group (p = 0.042). The beta diversity of Jaccard distance index was significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.027). Blautia obeum and Veillonella parvula were more abundant in the cholecystectomy group. The difference in the diversity of the gut microbiota between the cholecystectomy and control groups was subtle. However, B. obeum and V. parvula, which have azoreductase activity, were more abundant in the cholecystectomy group. The impact of such changes in the gut microbiota on health remains to be determined.

1 July 2011 in Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EPEunkyo Park
Eunkyo Park
SLSeung Min Lee
Seung Min Lee
IJIn-Kyung Jung
In-Kyung Jung
YLYunsook Lim
Yunsook Lim
JKJung-Hyun Kim
Jung-Hyun Kim

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KYKyung Eun Yun
Kyung Eun Yun
JKJimin Kim
Jimin Kim
MKMi-Hyun Kim
Mi-Hyun Kim
EPEunkyo Park
Eunkyo Park
HKHyung-Lae Kim
Hyung-Lae Kim
HKHan-Na Kim
Han-Na Kim
The gut microbiota has been linked to blood lipids. However, the relationship between the gut microbiome and other lipid markers like apolipoproteins A1 (apoA1) and B (apoB) as well as classical lipid markers in Asians remain unclear. Here, we examined the associations between gut microbial diversity and taxonomic compositions with both apolipoproteins and lipid markers in a large number of Korean patients. The fecal 16S rRNA gene sequencing data from 1141 subjects were analyzed and subjects were categorized into control group (G0) or abnormal group (G1) according to blood lipid measurements. The microbial diversity and several taxa of the gut microbiota were significantly associated with triglyceride, apoA1, and apoB levels, but not with total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. The alpha diversity of the gut microbiota was inversely associated with high triglyceride level. Interestingly, G1 of apoA1 showed increased microbial richness and distinct microbial community compared with G0 of apoA1. A high abundance of Fusobacteria and low abundance of Oscillospira were found in the hypertriglyceridemia group. In this large-scale study, we identified associations of gut microbiota with apolipoproteins and classical lipid markers, indicating that the gut microbiota may be an important target for regulating blood lipids.

1 January 2011 in Nutrition Research and Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EPEunkyo Park
Eunkyo Park
JLJung Eun Lee
Jung Eun Lee
JAJoong Hyuck Auh
Joong Hyuck Auh
HCHyung-Kyoon Choi
Hyung-Kyoon Choi
JLJaehwi Lee
Jaehwi Lee
JKJung-Hyun Kim
Jung-Hyun Kim
Lee JE, et al. Nutr Res Pract. 2011 Oct;5(5):429-434. http://dx.doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2011.5.5.429