Purpose: A new fixed-dose combination (FDC) formulation of telmisartan 80 mg and S-amlodipine 5 mg (CKD-828) has been developed to increase convenience (as only one tablet is required per day) and improve treatment compliance. Methods: The pharmacokinetic characteristics and tolerability of an FDC of telmisartan and S-amlodipine were compared to those after coadministration of the individual agents in this randomized, open-label, single-dose, two-way, four-period, crossover study. To analyze the telmisartan and S-amlodipine plasma concentrations using a validated liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method, serial blood samples were collected up to 48 hours post-dose for telmisartan and 144 hours post-dose for S-amlodipine, in each period. Results: Forty-eight healthy subjects were enrolled, and 43 completed the study. The mean peak plasma concentration (C_max) and the area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to the last measurement (AUC_0–t) values of telmisartan were 522.29 ng/mL and 2,475.16 ng⋅h/mL for the FDC, and 540.45 ng/mL and 2,559.57 ng⋅h/mL for the individual agents concomitantly administered, respectively. The mean C_max and AUC_0–t values of S-amlodipine were 2.71 ng/mL and 130.69 ng⋅h/mL for the FDC, and 2.74 ng/mL and 129.81 ng⋅h/mL for the individual agents concomitantly administered, respectively. The geometric mean ratio (GMR) and 90% confidence interval (CI) for the telmisartan C_max and AUC_0–t (FDC of telmisartan and S-amlodipine/concomitant administration) were 0.8509 (0.7353–0.9846) and 0.9431 (0.8698–1.0226), respectively. The GMR and 90% CI for the S-amlodipine C_max and AUC_0–t (FDC/concomitant administration) were 0.9829 (0.9143–1.0567) and 0.9632 (0.8798–1.0546), respectively. As the intrasubject variability of the C_max for telmisartan administered individually was 42.94%, all 90% CIs of the GMRs fell within the predetermined acceptance range. Both treatments were well tolerated in this study. Conclusion: CKD-828 FDC tablets were shown to be bioequivalent to coadministration of the individual agents with the respective strength, in healthy subjects under fasting conditions. There was no significant difference in safety profile between the two treatments.

Objective: The pharmacokinetic profiles and bioequivalence of a new rosuvastatin/ezetimibe fixed-dose combination (FDC; NVP-1205) vs. rosuvastatin and ezetimibe concomitantly administered as single agents were evaluated. Materials and methods: In this open-label, single-dose, crossover study (NCT02029625), eligible subjects were randomly assigned in a 1 : 1 ratio to receive a single dose of rosuvastatin (10 mg) with ezetimibe (10 mg) as either a FDC or as single agents concomitantly administered under fasted conditions, followed by a 2-week washout period and administration of the alternate formulation. Serial blood samples were collected predose and up to 96 hours postdose in each period for determination of plasma rosuvastatin and ezetimibe concentrations by liquid-chromatography tandem mass spectroscopy and calculation of pharmacokinetic parameters. Results: The mean C-max and AUC(0-t) values of rosuvastatin were 12.5 ng/mL and 115.6 ngxh/mL for the FDC, and 12.2 ng/mL and 115.1 ngxh/mL for the single agents concomitantly administered, respectively. The mean C-max and AUC(0-t) values of ezetimibe were 4.7 ng/mL and 67.3 ngxh/mL for the FDC, and 4.5 ng/mL and 68.2 ngxh/mL for the single agents concomitantly administered, respectively. The geometric mean ratio (GMR) and 90% confidence interval (CI) for the rosuvastatin C-max and AUC(0-t) were 106.20 (96.62 - 116.74) and 102.88 (96.32 - 109.90), respectively. The GMR and 90% CI for the ezetimibe C-max and AUC(0-t) were 108.96 (98.56 - 120.51) and 98.13 (92.01 - 104.66), respectively. All treatments were well tolerated during this study, with no serious adverse events reported. Conclusion: The rosuvastatin/ezetimibe (10/10 mg) FDC was bioequivalent to single agents concomitantly administered. A single dose of rosuvastatin/ezetimibe as the FDC or as single agents was well tolerated.

Dyslipidemia is a major risk factor for development of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Effective lipid-lowering therapies has led to CVD risk reduction. This study evaluated the possible pharmacokinetic interactions between fenofibrate, a peroxisome proliferators-activated receptors α agonist, and pitavastatin, a 3-hydoxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, in healthy Korean subjects. The study design was an open-label, randomized, multiple-dose, three-period, and six-sequence crossover study with a 10-day washout in 24 healthy volunteers. It had three treatments: 160 mg of micronized fenofibrate once daily for 5 days; 2 mg of pitavastatin once daily for 5 days; and 160 mg of micronized fenofibrate with 2 mg of pitavastatin for 5 days. Serial blood samples were collected at scheduled intervals for up to 48 h after the last dose in each period to determine the steady-state pharmacokinetics of both drugs. Plasma concentrations of fenofibric acid and pitavastatin were measured using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography with the tandem mass spectrometry method. A total of 24 subjects completed the study. Pitavastatin, when co-administered with micronized fenofibrate, had no effect on the C_max,ss and AUC_τ,ss of fenofibric acid. The C_max,ss and AUC_τ,ss of pitavastatin were increased by 36% and 12%, respectively, when co-administered with fenofibrate. Combined treatment with pitavastatin and micronized fenofibrate was generally well tolerated without serious adverse events. Our results demonstrated no clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions between micronized fenofibrate and pitavastatin when 160 mg of micronized fenofibrate and 2 mg of pitavastatin are co-administered. The treatments were well tolerated during the study, with no serious adverse events.