Mihaly Dobroka

Prof. Dr. Mihaly Dobroka

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

52Years (1975-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 February 1995 in Geophysical Prospecting
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AHA. Hering
A. Hering
RMR. Misiek
R. Misiek
AGA. Gyulai
A. Gyulai
TOT. Ormos
T. Ormos
MDMihaly Dobroka
Mihaly Dobroka
LDL. Dresen
L. Dresen

1 July 1991 in Geophysical Prospecting
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MDMihaly Dobroka
Mihaly Dobroka
ÁGÁ. Gyulai
Á. Gyulai
TOT. Ormos
T. Ormos
JCJ. Csókás
J. Csókás
LDL. Dresen
L. Dresen

22 February 2016 in Geophysics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MDMihaly Dobroka
Mihaly Dobroka
SNSzabo Norbert
Szabo Norbert
JTJózsef Tóth
József Tóth
PVPéter Vass
Péter Vass
The quality analysis of well-logging inversion results has always been an important part of formation evaluation. The precise calculation of hydrocarbon reserves requires the most accurate possible estimation of porosity, water saturation, and shale and rock-matrix volumes. The local inversion method conventionally used to predict the above model parameters depth by depth represents a marginally overdetermined inverse problem, which is rather sensitive to the uncertainty of observed data and limited in estimation accuracy. To reduce the harmful effect of data noise on the estimated model, we have suggested the interval inversion method, in which an increase of the overdetermination ratio allows a more accurate solution of the well-logging inverse problem. The interval inversion method inverts the data set of a longer depth interval to predict the vertical distributions of petrophysical parameters in a joint inversion procedure. In formulating the forward problem, we have extended the validity of probe response functions to a greater depth interval assuming the petrophysical parameters are depth dependent, and then we expanded the model parameters into a series using the Legendre polynomials as basis functions for modeling inhomogeneous formations. We solved the inverse problem for a much smaller number of expansion coefficients than data to derive the petrophysical parameters in a stable overdetermined inversion procedure. The added advantage of the interval inversion method is that the layer thicknesses and suitably chosen zone parameters can be estimated automatically by the inversion procedure to refine the results of inverse and forward modeling. We have defined depth-dependent model covariance and correlation matrices to compare the quality of the local and interval inversion results. A detailed study using well logs measured from a Hungarian gas-bearing unconsolidated formation revealed that the greatly overdetermined interval inversion procedure can be effectively used in reducing the estimation errors in shaly sand formations, which may refine significantly the results of reserve calculation.

1 January 1997 in Geophysical Prospecting
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RMR. Misiek
R. Misiek
ALA. Liebig
A. Liebig
AGA. Gyulai
A. Gyulai
TOT. Ormos
T. Ormos
MDMihaly Dobroka
Mihaly Dobroka
LDL. Dresen
L. Dresen