Peter Bond

Dr. Peter Bond

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
6 February 2012 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BCBenedict C. S. Cross
Benedict C. S. Cross
PBPeter Bond
Peter Bond
PSPawel G. Sadowski
Pawel G. Sadowski
Babal Kant JhaBabal Kant Jha
Babal Kant Jha
JZJaroslav Zak
Jaroslav Zak
HHHeather P. Harding
Heather P. Harding
IRE1 couples endoplasmic reticulum unfolded protein load to RNA cleavage events that culminate in the sequence-specific splicing of the Xbp1 mRNA and in the regulated degradation of diverse membrane-bound mRNAs. We report on the identification of a small molecule inhibitor that attains its selectivity by forming an unusually stable Schiff base with lysine 907 in the IRE1 endonuclease domain, explained by solvent inaccessibility of the imine bond in the enzyme-inhibitor complex. The inhibitor (abbreviated 4μ8C) blocks substrate access to the active site of IRE1 and selectively inactivates both Xbp1 splicing and IRE1-mediated mRNA degradation. Surprisingly, inhibition of IRE1 endonuclease activity does not sensitize cells to the consequences of acute endoplasmic reticulum stress, but rather interferes with the expansion of secretory capacity. Thus, the chemical reactivity and sterics of a unique residue in the endonuclease active site of IRE1 can be exploited by selective inhibitors to interfere with protein secretion in pathological settings.

1 May 2018 in Cell Metabolism
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Graeme LancasterGraeme Lancaster
Graeme Lancaster
KLKatherine G. Langley
Katherine G. Langley
NBNils Anton Berglund
Nils Anton Berglund
HKHelene L. Kammoun
Helene L. Kammoun
SRSaskia Reibe
Saskia Reibe
Mark A FebbraioMark A Febbraio
Mark A Febbraio

1 March 2007 in Journal of Structural Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PBPeter Bond
Peter Bond
JHJohn Holyoake
John Holyoake
AIAnthony Ivetac
Anthony Ivetac
SKSyma Khalid
Syma Khalid
MSMark Sansom
Mark Sansom

4 February 2006 in Journal of the American Chemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PBPeter Bond
Peter Bond
MSMark Sansom
Mark Sansom

17 February 2012 in Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Johannes KirchmairJohannes Kirchmair
Johannes Kirchmair
MWMark J. Williamson
Mark J. Williamson
JTJonathan Tyzack
Jonathan Tyzack
LTLu Tan
Lu Tan
PBPeter Bond
Peter Bond
RGRobert Glen
Robert Glen
Metabolism of xenobiotics remains a central challenge for the discovery and development of drugs, cosmetics, nutritional supplements, and agrochemicals. Metabolic transformations are frequently related to the incidence of toxic effects that may result from the emergence of reactive species, the systemic accumulation of metabolites, or by induction of metabolic pathways. Experimental investigation of the metabolism of small organic molecules is particularly resource demanding; hence, computational methods are of considerable interest to complement experimental approaches. This review provides a broad overview of structure- and ligand-based computational methods for the prediction of xenobiotic metabolism. Current computational approaches to address xenobiotic metabolism are discussed from three major perspectives: (i) prediction of sites of metabolism (SOMs), (ii) elucidation of potential metabolites and their chemical structures, and (iii) prediction of direct and indirect effects of xenobiotics on metabolizing enzymes, where the focus is on the cytochrome P450 (CYP) superfamily of enzymes, the cardinal xenobiotics metabolizing enzymes. For each of these domains, a variety of approaches and their applications are systematically reviewed, including expert systems, data mining approaches, quantitative structure–activity relationships (QSARs), and machine learning-based methods, pharmacophore-based algorithms, shape-focused techniques, molecular interaction fields (MIFs), reactivity-focused techniques, protein–ligand docking, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, and combinations of methods. Predictive metabolism is a developing area, and there is still enormous potential for improvement. However, it is clear that the combination of rapidly increasing amounts of available ligand- and structure-related experimental data (in particular, quantitative data) with novel and diverse simulation and modeling approaches is accelerating the development of effective tools for prediction of in vivo metabolism, which is reflected by the diverse and comprehensive data sources and methods for metabolism prediction reviewed here. This review attempts to survey the range and scope of computational methods applied to metabolism prediction and also to compare and contrast their applicability and performance.

1 November 2011 in Journal of Proteomics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AKAlexios Koutsoukas
Alexios Koutsoukas
BSBenjamin Simms
Benjamin Simms
Johannes KirchmairJohannes Kirchmair
Johannes Kirchmair
PBPeter Bond
Peter Bond
AWAlan V. Whitmore
Alan V. Whitmore
ABAndreas Bender
Andreas Bender