Suet-Feung Chin

Dr. Suet-Feung Chin

Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, UK

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

34Years (1993-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 April 2012 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MGMETABRIC Group
METABRIC Group
CCChristina Curtis
Christina Curtis
SSSohrab P. Shah
Sohrab P. Shah
SCSuet-Feung Chin
Suet-Feung Chin
Gulisa TurashviliGulisa Turashvili
Gulisa Turashvili
SASamuel Aparicio
Samuel Aparicio
The elucidation of breast cancer subgroups and their molecular drivers requires integrated views of the genome and transcriptome from representative numbers of patients. We present an integrated analysis of copy number and gene expression in a discovery and validation set of 997 and 995 primary breast tumours, respectively, with long-term clinical follow-up. Inherited variants (copy number variants and single nucleotide polymorphisms) and acquired somatic copy number aberrations (CNAs) were associated with expression in ∼40% of genes, with the landscape dominated by cis- and trans-acting CNAs. By delineating expression outlier genes driven in cis by CNAs, we identified putative cancer genes, including deletions in PPP2R2A, MTAP and MAP2K4. Unsupervised analysis of paired DNA–RNA profiles revealed novel subgroups with distinct clinical outcomes, which reproduced in the validation cohort. These include a high-risk, oestrogen-receptor-positive 11q13/14 cis-acting subgroup and a favourable prognosis subgroup devoid of CNAs. Trans-acting aberration hotspots were found to modulate subgroup-specific gene networks, including a TCR deletion-mediated adaptive immune response in the ‘CNA-devoid’ subgroup and a basal-specific chromosome 5 deletion-associated mitotic network. Our results provide a novel molecular stratification of the breast cancer population, derived from the impact of somatic CNAs on the transcriptome.

4 January 2012 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CRCaryn S. Ross-Innes
Caryn S. Ross-Innes
RSRory Stark
Rory Stark
ATAndrew E. Teschendorff
Andrew E. Teschendorff
KHKelly A. Holmes
Kelly A. Holmes
HAH. Raza Ali
H. Raza Ali
JCJason S. Carroll
Jason S. Carroll
Genome-wide mapping of oestrogen receptor-α binding sites in primary breast cancer tissues shows that oestrogen receptor binding is dynamically regulated and that the expression of genes near differentially bound regulatory regions is associated with clinical outcome. Most breast tumours express the oestrogen receptor-α (ER), and this transcription factor is seen as an important drug target for the treatment of breast cancer. Jason Carroll and colleagues have mapped ER binding sites in solid primary cancers for the first time, and find distinct ER-binding profiles that are mediated in part by the FoxA1 DNA-binding protein and are associated with better or worse clinical outcome. As well as providing a potentially useful method of prognosis, this work may help to answer one of the major questions in breast cancer biology: how some ER+ tumours become drug resistant. Oestrogen receptor-α (ER) is the defining and driving transcription factor in the majority of breast cancers and its target genes dictate cell growth and endocrine response, yet genomic understanding of ER function has been restricted to model systems1,2,3. Here we map genome-wide ER-binding events, by chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by high-throughput sequencing (ChIP-seq), in primary breast cancers from patients with different clinical outcomes and in distant ER-positive metastases. We find that drug-resistant cancers still recruit ER to the chromatin, but that ER binding is a dynamic process, with the acquisition of unique ER-binding regions in tumours from patients that are likely to relapse. The acquired ER regulatory regions associated with poor clinical outcome observed in primary tumours reveal gene signatures that predict clinical outcome in ER-positive disease exclusively. We find that the differential ER-binding programme observed in tumours from patients with poor outcome is not due to the selection of a rare subpopulation of cells, but is due to the FOXA1-mediated reprogramming of ER binding on a rapid timescale. The parallel redistribution of ER and FOXA1 binding events in drug-resistant cellular contexts is supported by histological co-expression of ER and FOXA1 in metastatic samples. By establishing transcription-factor mapping in primary tumour material, we show that there is plasticity in ER-binding capacity, with distinct combinations of cis-regulatory elements linked with the different clinical outcomes.

28 March 2013 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SDSarah-Jane Dawson
Sarah-Jane Dawson
DTDana W.Y. Tsui
Dana W.Y. Tsui
MMMuhammed Murtaza
Muhammed Murtaza
HBHeather Biggs
Heather Biggs
OROscar M. Rueda
Oscar M. Rueda
NRNitzan Rosenfeld
Nitzan Rosenfeld
The management of metastatic breast cancer requires monitoring of the tumor burden to determine the response to treatment, and improved biomarkers are needed. Biomarkers such as cancer antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3) and circulating tumor cells have been widely studied. However, circulating cell-free DNA carrying tumor-specific alterations (circulating tumor DNA) has not been extensively investigated or compared with other circulating biomarkers in breast cancer. We compared the radiographic imaging of tumors with the assay of circulating tumor DNA, CA 15-3, and circulating tumor cells in 30 women with metastatic breast cancer who were receiving systemic therapy. We used targeted or whole-genome sequencing to identify somatic genomic alterations and designed personalized assays to quantify circulating tumor DNA in serially collected plasma specimens. CA 15-3 levels and numbers of circulating tumor cells were measured at identical time points. Circulating tumor DNA was successfully detected in 29 of the 30 women (97%) in whom somatic genomic alterations were identified; CA 15-3 and circulating tumor cells were detected in 21 of 27 women (78%) and 26 of 30 women (87%), respectively. Circulating tumor DNA levels showed a greater dynamic range, and greater correlation with changes in tumor burden, than did CA 15-3 or circulating tumor cells. Among the measures tested, circulating tumor DNA provided the earliest measure of treatment response in 10 of 19 women (53%). This proof-of-concept analysis showed that circulating tumor DNA is an informative, inherently specific, and highly sensitive biomarker of metastatic breast cancer. (Funded by Cancer Research UK and others.)

4 April 2012 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SSSohrab P. Shah
Sohrab P. Shah
ARAndrew Roth
Andrew Roth
RGRodrigo Goya
Rodrigo Goya
AOArusha Oloumi
Arusha Oloumi
GHGavin Ha
Gavin Ha
SASamuel Aparicio
Samuel Aparicio

16 May 2012 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
T(The Oslo Breast Cancer Consortium (OSBREAC)
The Oslo Breast Cancer Consortium (OSBREAC)
PSPhilip J. Stephens
Philip J. Stephens
PTPatrick S. Tarpey
Patrick S. Tarpey
HDHelen Davies
Helen Davies
PLPeter Van Loo
Peter Van Loo
MSMichael R. Stratton
Michael R. Stratton

10 May 2016 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BPBernard Pereira
Bernard Pereira
SCSuet-Feung Chin
Suet-Feung Chin
OROscar M. Rueda
Oscar M. Rueda
HVHans-Kristian Moen Vollan
Hans-Kristian Moen Vollan
EPElena Provenzano
Elena Provenzano
CCCarlos Caldas
Carlos Caldas
The genomic landscape of breast cancer is complex, and inter- and intra-tumour heterogeneity are important challenges in treating the disease. In this study, we sequence 173 genes in 2,433 primary breast tumours that have copy number aberration (CNA), gene expression and long-term clinical follow-up data. We identify 40 mutation-driver (Mut-driver) genes, and determine associations between mutations, driver CNA profiles, clinical-pathological parameters and survival. We assess the clonal states of Mut-driver mutations, and estimate levels of intra-tumour heterogeneity using mutant-allele fractions. Associations between PIK3CA mutations and reduced survival are identified in three subgroups of ER-positive cancer (defined by amplification of 17q23, 11q13–14 or 8q24). High levels of intra-tumour heterogeneity are in general associated with a worse outcome, but highly aggressive tumours with 11q13–14 amplification have low levels of intra-tumour heterogeneity. These results emphasize the importance of genome-based stratification of breast cancer, and have important implications for designing therapeutic strategies.