Background The concept of “accelerated” chronic lymphocytic leukemia is frequently used by both pathologists and clinicians. However, neither histological criteria to define this form of chronic lymphocytic leukemia nor its clinical correlates and prognostic impact have been formally defined in large series of patients. Design and Methods Tissue biopsies from 100 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia were analyzed for the size of proliferation centers and their proliferation rate as assessed by mitosis count and Ki-67 immunostaining. Histological patterns were correlated with main clinico-biological features and outcome. Results A suspicion of disease transformation was the main reason for carrying out tissue biopsy, which was performed at a median time of 14 months (range, 0 to 204 months) after the diagnosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. The biopsy showed histological transformation to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in 22 cases. In the remaining 78 patients, the presence of expanded proliferation centers (broader than a 20x field) and high proliferation rate (either >2.4 mitoses/proliferation center or Ki-67 >40%/proliferation center) predicted a poor outcome and were selected to define a highly proliferative group. Thus, 23 patients with either expanded proliferation centers or high proliferation rate were considered as having “accelerated” chronic lymphocytic leukemia. These patients displayed particular features, including higher serum lactate dehydrogenase levels and more frequently elevated ZAP-70 than “non-accelerated” cases. The median survival from biopsy of patients with “non-accelerated” chronic lymphocytic leukemia, “accelerated” chronic lymphocytic leukemia and transformation to diffuse large B-cell leukemia was 76, 34, and 4.3 months, respectively (P<0.001). Conclusions The presence of expanded and/or highly active proliferation centers identifies a group of patients with “accelerated” chronic lymphocytic leukemia characterized by an aggressive clinical behavior.

The presence of circulating plasma cells in patients with multiple myeloma is considered a marker for highly proliferative disease. In the study herein, the impact of circulating plasma cells assessed by cytology on survival of patients with multiple myeloma was analyzed. Wright-Giemsa stained peripheral blood smears of 482 patients with newly diagnosed myeloma or plasma cell leukemia were reviewed and patients were classified into 4 categories according to the percentage of circulating plasma cells: 0%, 1–4%, 5–20%, and plasma cell leukemia with the following frequencies: 382 (79.2%), 83 (17.2%), 12 (2.5%) and 5 (1.0%), respectively. Median overall survival according to the circulating plasma cells group was 47, 50, 6 and 14 months, respectively. At multivariate analysis, the presence of 5 to 20% circulating plasma cells was associated with a worse overall survival (relative risk 4.9, 95% CI 2.6–9.3) independently of age, creatinine, the Durie-Salmon system stage and the International Staging System (ISS) stage. Patients with ≥5% circulating plasma cells had lower platelet counts (median 86×10⁹/L vs. 214×10⁹/L, P<0.0001) and higher bone marrow plasma cells (median 53% vs. 36%, P=0.004). The presence of ≥5% circulating plasma cells in patients with multiple myeloma has a similar adverse prognostic impact as plasma cell leukemia.

In the current World Health Organization (WHO)-classification, therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes (t-MDS) are categorized together with therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and t-myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms into one subgroup independent of morphologic or prognostic features. Analyzing data of 2087 t-MDS patients from different international MDS groups to evaluate classification and prognostication tools we found that applying the WHO classification for p-MDS successfully predicts time to transformation and survival (both p < 0.001). The results regarding carefully reviewed cytogenetic data, classifications, and prognostic scores confirmed that t-MDS are similarly heterogeneous as p-MDS and therefore deserve the same careful differentiation regarding risk. As reference, these results were compared with 4593 primary MDS (p-MDS) patients represented in the International Working Group for Prognosis in MDS database (IWG-PM). Although a less favorable clinical outcome occurred in each t-MDS subset compared with p-MDS subgroups, FAB and WHO-classification, IPSS-R, and WPSS-R separated t-MDS patients into differing risk groups effectively, indicating that all established risk factors for p-MDS maintained relevance in t-MDS, with cytogenetic features having enhanced predictive power. These data strongly argue to classify t-MDS as a separate entity distinct from other WHO-classified t-myeloid neoplasms, which would enhance treatment decisions and facilitate the inclusion of t-MDS patients into clinical studies.