Rami Bou Khalil

Dr. Rami Bou Khalil

Saint Joseph University of Beirut
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 November 2012 in Palliative and Supportive Care
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Rami Bou KhalilRami Bou Khalil
Rami Bou Khalil
The aim of this review is to evaluate the current status concerning attitudes, beliefs and/or practices of patients, family members, health professionals and/or caregivers regarding truth disclosure about a cancer diagnosis in the Greater Middle East countries. A search was done via MedLine for all publications related to this review objective. 55 publications were included emanating from Egypt, Iran, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Palestine Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and United Arab Emirates. In the Greater Middle East region, a diagnosis of cancer is still mixed with social stigma and misperceptions related to incurability. Physicians conserve a truth disclosure policy in which from one side they respect some of the historical and cultural misperceptions about cancer and accordingly, tell the truth about cancer to one of the family members and from another side acknowledge the patients' right to know the truth and tend to disclose it for him(or her) when possible. Family members and caregivers' attitudes, perceptions and beliefs about telling the truth to the patient seem to be in favor of concealment. Discrepant results concerning physicians' and patients' evaluation of the quality of truth disclosure exist in the literature. Education programs in breaking bad news are lacking in many countries. Finally, the most important and common problem affecting truth disclosure to a patient suffering from cancer is the lack of codes and legislations concerning the patients' rights in an informed consent. Studies, legislations and training programs are needed in this domain in Middle Eastern societies.

1 November 2011 in Clinical Neuropharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Rami Bou KhalilRami Bou Khalil
Rami Bou Khalil
SRSami Richa
Sami Richa
Because many patients with mental illness take more than one psychotropic drug, an understanding of the effects of every class of these drugs is very important to manage any thyroid abnormalities that can happen with these patients. A systematic review of all the published literature was made via Medline. Keywords used for the search were "thyroid side effects" in association with one of the following: "antipsychotics," "antidepressants," "lithium," "anticonvulsants," "benzodiazepines," "anticholinergics," "antihistaminergics," "cholinesterase inhibitors," "stimulants," "methadone," and "naltrexone." Phenothiazines, which are antipsychotics, mainly alter iodine capture, complex and deactivate it, as well as decrease thyroid-stimulating hormone's (TSH's) response to thyroid-releasing hormone (TRH). Nonphenothiazines, typical antipsychotics, can induce the formation of thyroid autoantibodies and can elevate TSH levels. Atypical antipsychotics may decrease TRH-stimulated TSH. Tricyclic antidepressant drugs complex with iodine and thyroid peroxidase and deactivate them, induce deiodinase activity and interfere with the hypothalamo-pituitary-thyroid (HPT) axis by decreasing TSH response to TRH. The main effect with other antidepressant drugs is a decrease in circulating thyroid hormone levels. Lithium inhibits thyroid hormone release and increases TRH-stimulated TSH, inducing goiter, clinical and subclinical hypothyroidism, and hyperthyroidism. Carbamazepine mainly reversibly decreases serum thyroid hormone levels. Other psychotropic drugs such as valproic acid, benzodiazepines, opiates, anticholinergic and antihistaminergic drugs, and stimulants have minor interferences with thyroid functions. Patients receiving lithium, phenothiazines, and tricyclic antidepressants TCA should be closely monitored for the development of thyroid function abnormalities. Only patients at risk for developing thyroid function abnormalities should be monitored when they receive typical and/or atypical antipsychotic drugs, nontricyclic antidepressant drugs, and carbamazepine. No specific recommendations are proposed as toward thyroid function monitoring for patients receiving any other psychopharmacologic drug.

7 September 2014 in BMC Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CECharline El-Hachem
Charline El-Hachem
JRJihane Rohayem
Jihane Rohayem
Rami Bou KhalilRami Bou Khalil
Rami Bou Khalil
SRSami Richa
Sami Richa
AKAssaad Kesrouani
Assaad Kesrouani
EAElie Attieh
Elie Attieh
During the postpartum period, women are vulnerable to depression affecting about 10 to 20% of mothers during the first year after delivery. However, only 50% of women with prominent symptoms are diagnosed with postpartum depression (PPD). The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is the most widely used screening instrument for PPD . The main objectives of this study are to assess whether an EPDS score of 9 or more on day 2 (D2) postpartum is predictive of a depressive episode between days 30 and 40 postpartum (D30-40), to determine the risk factors as well as the prevalence of PPD in a sample of Lebanese women and to determine a threshold score of EPDS predictive of PPD. A sample of 228 women were administered the EPDS on D2. An assessment for PPD was done on D30-40 during a telephone interview. On D2, the average score on EPDS was 7.1 (SD = 5.2) and 33.3% of women had an EPDS score ≥ 9. On D30-40 postpartum, the average score was 6.5 (SD = 4.7) and 19 women (12.8%) presented with PPD. A positive correlation was shown between scores on EPDS on D2 and D30-40 (r = 0.5091, p < 0.0001). A stepwise regression shows that an EPDS score ≥9 on D2 (p < 0.001) and a personal history of depression (p = 0.008) are significantly associated with the diagnosis of PPD on D30-40. The EPDS may be considered as a reliable screening tool on as early as D2 after delivery. Women with EPDS score ≥ 9 and/or a positive personal history of major depressive disorder should benefit from a closer follow-up during the rest of the post-partum period.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Philibert DuriezPhilibert Duriez
Philibert Duriez
Rami Bou KhalilRami Bou Khalil
Rami Bou Khalil
YCYara Chamoun
Yara Chamoun
RMRedwan Maatoug
Redwan Maatoug
RSRobertas Strumila
Robertas Strumila
SGSébastien Guillaume
Sébastien Guillaume
The management of eating disorders (EDs) is still difficult and few treatments are effective. Recently, several studies have described the important contribution of non-invasive brain stimulation (repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, and electroconvulsive therapy) and invasive brain stimulation (deep brain stimulation and vagal nerve stimulation) for ED management. This review summarizes the available evidence supporting the use of brain stimulation in ED. All published studies on brain stimulation in ED as well as ongoing trials registered at clinicaltrials.gov were examined. Articles on neuromodulation research and perspective articles were also included. This analysis indicates that brain stimulation in EDs is still in its infancy. Literature data consist mainly of case reports, cases series, open studies, and only a few randomized controlled trials. Consequently, the evidence supporting the use of brain stimulation in EDs remains weak. Finally, this review discusses future directions in this research domain (e.g., sites of modulation, how to enhance neuromodulation efficacy, personalized protocols).

1 May 2012 in Clinical Neuropharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Rami Bou KhalilRami Bou Khalil
Rami Bou Khalil
There has been an increase in the European and North American schizophrenia literature discussing the high prevalence of metabolic syndrome induced by atypical antipsychotic agents. The aim of this article was to review available data on metabolic syndrome induced by atypical antipsychotic agents in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorders selected from societies different from European and North American ones (termed non-Euro-American societies [NEAS]). A review of the literature published via MedLine between 1975 and July 2011 was consulted. Terms used for the search were "glucose intolerance, metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, weight gain, dyslipidemia" in association with "atypical antipsychotic drugs, second generation antipsychotics, risperidone, olanzapine, aripiprazole, ziprasidone, quetiapine, clozapine, zotepine, perospirone, paliperidone, iloperidone, asenapine, amisulpride, lurasidone." Prospective studies selecting patients from NEAS show that olanzapine poses the highest metabolic syndrome incidence. Clozapine poses the highest prevalence of this syndrome. In NEAS, the prevalence of this syndrome ranges from 14.7% to 69.3%. The incidence could be considered as 20% (according to the International Diabetes Federation criteria) after 1 year of treatment with an atypical antipsychotic drug. Female sex, older age, and high body mass index seem to be the most frequent risk factor mentioned. A possible stratification of the risk of metabolic syndrome in patients with schizophrenia receiving atypical antipsychotic drugs is as follows: Minimal-risk societies are constituted by societies living in Eastern Asian countries, whereas intermediate-risk societies are constituted by societies living in Western Asia and South America, and high-risk societies are societies living in Australia. The metabolic syndrome development profile in patients with schizophrenia receiving atypical antipsychotic drugs in NEAS seems to be comparable to that in European and North American societies, especially when, among NEAS, high-risk societies are concerned. Comparative controlled studies are needed for a better comprehension of this adverse drug effect between both types of societies.

12 March 2019 in Journal of Mental Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LSLama Souaiby
Lama Souaiby
FKFrancois Kazour
Francois Kazour
MZMarouan Nassib Zoghbi
Marouan Nassib Zoghbi
Rami Bou KhalilRami Bou Khalil
Rami Bou Khalil
SRSami Richa
Sami Richa
Background: Antipsychotic-induced sexual dysfunction is a common complaint among patients with psychotic disorders. However, few papers have discussed its impact on treatment adherence. Aims: The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of antipsychotic induced sexual dysfunction in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder and assess its impact on treatment adherence. Methods: Nighty-five outpatients treated with antipsychotics for at least four weeks were recruited. Sexual dysfunction was assessed using a questionnaire inspired from the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersøgelser (UKU) Side Effect Rating Scale and the Psychotropic-Related Sexual Dysfunction Questionnaire (PRSexDQ). An Arabic version of the Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS) was used to assess treatment adherence. Results: The prevalence of sexual dysfunction was 57.9%, of which 65.5% attributed it to treatment. Reduced desire was the mostly reported sexual dysfunction in males and females. Number, dose and duration of antipsychotics were not associated with sexual dysfunction. MARS score was associated with the presence of sexual dysfunction (p = 0.0001) and its attribution to antipsychotic medication (p = 0.0003), the latter being an independent associated variable (p = 0.001). Conclusion: Sexual dysfunction is prevalent in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder treated with antipsychotic drugs. Clinicians should ask about sexual dysfunction and discuss its different causes with patients in order to improve adherence.