Mark A. Green

Dr. Mark A. Green


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
18 February 2021 in Current Oncology Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WOWynton B. Overcast
Wynton B. Overcast
KDKorbin M. Davis
Korbin M. Davis
CHChang Y. Ho
Chang Y. Ho
GHGary D. Hutchins
Gary D. Hutchins
MGMark A. Green
Mark A. Green
MVMichael Veronesi
Michael Veronesi
Purpose of Review: This review will explore the latest in advanced imaging techniques, with a focus on the complementary nature of multiparametric, multimodality imaging using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET). Recent Findings: Advanced MRI techniques including perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI), MR spectroscopy (MRS), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and MR chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) offer significant advantages over conventional MR imaging when evaluating tumor extent, predicting grade, and assessing treatment response. PET performed in addition to advanced MRI provides complementary information regarding tumor metabolic properties, particularly when performed simultaneously. 18F-fluoroethyltyrosine (FET) PET improves the specificity of tumor diagnosis and evaluation of post-treatment changes. Incorporation of radiogenomics and machine learning methods further improve advanced imaging. Summary: The complementary nature of combining advanced imaging techniques across modalities for brain tumor imaging and incorporating technologies such as radiogenomics has the potential to reshape the landscape in neuro-oncology.

19 August 2019 in Molecular Imaging and Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MGMark A. Green
Mark A. Green
GHGary D. Hutchins
Gary D. Hutchins
CBClinton D. Bahler
Clinton D. Bahler
MTMark Tann
Mark Tann
CMCarla J. Mathias
Carla J. Mathias
JFJames W. Fletcher
James W. Fletcher
Purpose This study was undertaken to evaluate radiation dosimetry for the prostate-specific membrane antigen targeted [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 radiopharmaceutical, and to initially assess agent performance in positron emission tomography (PET) detection of the site of disease in prostate cancer patients presenting with biochemical recurrence. Procedures Under IND 133,222 and an IRB-approved research protocol, we evaluated the biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 with serial PET imaging following intravenous administration to ten prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence. The recruited subjects were all patients in whom a recent [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/X-ray computed tomography (CT) exam had been independently performed under IND 131,806 to assist in decision-making with regard to their clinical care. Voided urine was collected from each subject at ~ 60 min and ~ 140 min post-[68Ga]Ga-P16-093 injection and assayed for Ga-68 content. Following image segmentation to extract tissue time-activity curves and corresponding cumulated activity values, radiation dosimetry estimates were calculated using IDAC Dose 2.1. The prior [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT exam (whole-body PET imaging at 60 min post-injection, performed with contrast-enhanced diagnostic CT) served as a reference scan for comparison to the [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 findings. Results [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 PET images at 60 min post-injection provided diagnostic information that appeared equivalent to the subject’s prior [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 scan. With both radiopharmaceuticals, sites of tumor recurrence were found in eight of the ten patients, identifying 16 lesions. The site of recurrence was not detected with either agent for the other two subjects. Bladder activity was consistently lower with [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 than [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11. The kidneys, spleen, salivary glands, and liver receive the highest radiation exposure from [68Ga]Ga-P16-093, with estimated doses of 1.7 × 10−1, 6.7 × 10−2, 6.5 × 10−2, and 5.6 × 10−2 mGy/MBq, respectively. The corresponding effective dose from [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 is 2.3 × 10−2 mSv/MBq. Conclusions [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 provided diagnostic information that appeared equivalent to [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in this limited series of ten prostate cancer patients presenting with biochemical recurrence, with the kidneys found to be the critical organ. Diminished tracer appearance in the urine represents a potential advantage of [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 over [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 for detection of lesions in the pelvis.

22 May 2014 in Applied Radiation and Isotopes
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YNYen Ng
Yen Ng
JLJeffrey L. Lacy
Jeffrey L. Lacy
JFJames W. Fletcher
James W. Fletcher
MGMark A. Green
Mark A. Green

1 October 2020 in Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CBClinton D. Bahler
Clinton D. Bahler
MJMelissa M. Johnson
Melissa M. Johnson
EDElai Davicioni
Elai Davicioni
JZJingbin Zhang
Jingbin Zhang
Liang ChengLiang Cheng
Liang Cheng
MKMichael O. Koch
Michael O. Koch

1 December 2018 in Applied Radiation and Isotopes
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CWCarmen L. Wissmann
Carmen L. Wissmann
MWMin Wang
Min Wang
MGMingzhang Gao
Mingzhang Gao
QZQi-Huang Zheng
Qi-Huang Zheng
MGMark A. Green
Mark A. Green

1 October 2016 in Applied Radiation and Isotopes
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MGMark A. Green
Mark A. Green
CMCarla J. Mathias
Carla J. Mathias
JFJames W. Fletcher
James W. Fletcher