The present research will provide an analytical explanation to experiments destabilising turbulence in pipe flow reported in Kuehnen et al. (Nat. Phys., vol. 14, 2018, 386–390). Those experiments show four methods by which turbulence vanishes from steady-state pipe flow, without decreasing its bulk velocity, until it becomes completely laminar. The explanation is based on our theory of underlying laminar flow (TULF), which has already been successfully applied to account for other uncommon experiments reported in the literature. The TULF is founded on the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations and thus is a theory of ensemble-averaged flows. The zero theorem for steady-state flow is introduced as a universal result that will help explain the laminarisation process described in experiments. After presenting the most comprehensive solution for the mean pipe flow governing equation that, to our knowledge, has ever been reported, we uncover a general sequence for laminarisation, called the laminarisation pattern, and we introduce a mathematical model for it. We show that a drastic decrease in a flow's mean-pressure gradient, while maintaining constant its Reynolds number, is necessary and sufficient to erase turbulence. Equations derived from our model are used to calculate the minimum pressure gradient necessary to cause complete laminarisation in each experiment. Results are then contrasted with reported experimental data, with noticeable agreement. We also propose a figure of merit to assess the efficiency of each laminarisation method. Having disclosed the intrinsic mechanism leading to complete laminarisation, we expect researchers will propose other ingenious methods to achieve it.

This research presents a new theory that explains analytically the behaviour of any fully developed incompressible turbulent pipe flow, steady or unsteady. We propose the name of theory of underlying laminar flow (TULF), because its main consequence is the description of any turbulent pipe flow as the sum of two components: the underlying laminar flow (ULF) and the purely turbulent component (PTC). We use the framework of the TULF to explain analytically most of the important and interesting phenomena reported in He & Jackson (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 408, 2000, pp. 1–38). To do so, we develop a simple model for the pressure gradient and Reynolds shear stress that could be applied to the linearly accelerated pipe flow described by He & Jackson (2000). The following features of the unsteady flow are explained: the deformation undergone by the mean velocity profiles during the transient, the velocity overshoot observed in the more rapid excursions, the dual deformation of mean velocity profiles when overshoots are present, the laminarisation effects described during acceleration, the rapid decrease of the Reynolds shear stress upon approaching the wall that brings forth the laminar sublayer, and some other minor effects. A new field is defined to characterise the degree of turbulence within the flow, directly calculable from the theory itself. Arguably, this new field would describe the degree of turbulence in a pipe flow more accurately than the familiar turbulence intensity parameter. Finally, a paradox is found in the deformation of the unsteady mean velocity profiles with respect to equal-Reynolds-number steady profiles, which is duly explained. The research also predicts the occurrence of mean velocity undershoots if the flow is decreased rapidly enough.