Kim A. Hoelmer

Dr. Kim A. Hoelmer

Beneficial Insects Introduction Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Newark, DE, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 August 2020 in Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Eric ContiEric Conti
Eric Conti
GAGONZALO AVILA
GONZALO AVILA
BBBarbara Barratt
Barbara Barratt
FCFernanda Cingolani
Fernanda Cingolani
Stefano ColazzaStefano Colazza
Stefano Colazza
ÉWÉric Wajnberg
Éric Wajnberg

8 May 2017 in Journal of Pest Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CDChristine Dieckhoff
Christine Dieckhoff
KTKathleen M. Tatman
Kathleen M. Tatman
Kim A. HoelmerKim A. Hoelmer
Kim A. Hoelmer

4 January 2022 in Journal of Economic Entomology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PAPaul Abram
Paul Abram
XWXingeng Wang
Xingeng Wang
THTracy Hueppelsheuser
Tracy Hueppelsheuser
MFMichelle T Franklin
Michelle T Franklin
KDKent Daane
Kent Daane
MBMatthew L Buffington
Matthew L Buffington
We provide recommendations for sampling and identification of introduced larval parasitoids of spotted-wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) (Diptera: Drosophilidae). These parasitoids are either under consideration for importation (aka classical) biological control introductions, or their adventive (presumed to have been accidentally introduced) populations have recently been discovered in North America and Europe. Within the context of the ecology of D. suzukii and its parasitoids, we discuss advantages and disadvantages of estimating larval parasitism levels using different methods, including naturally collected fruit samples and sentinel baits. For most situations, we recommend repeated sampling of naturally occurring fruit rather than using sentinel baits to monitor seasonal dynamics of host plant–Drosophila–parasitoid associations. We describe how to separate Drosophilidae puparia from host fruit material in order to accurately estimate parasitism levels and establish host–parasitoid associations. We provide instructions for identification of emerging parasitoids and include a key to the common families of parasitoids of D. suzukii. We anticipate that the guidelines for methodology and interpretation of results that we provide here will form the basis for a large, multi-research team sampling effort in the coming years to characterize the biological control and nontarget impacts of accidentally and intentionally introduced larval parasitoids of D. suzukii in several regions of the world.

11 November 2020 in Insects
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Giuseppino Sabbatini-PeverieriGiuseppino Sabbatini-Peverieri
Giuseppino Sabbatini-Peverieri
CDChristine Dieckhoff
Christine Dieckhoff
LGLucrezia Giovannini
Lucrezia Giovannini
LMLEONARDO MARIANELLI
LEONARDO MARIANELLI
PRPio Federico Roversi
Pio Federico Roversi
Kim A. HoelmerKim A. Hoelmer
Kim A. Hoelmer
Halyomorpha halys is a severe agricultural pest of Asian origin that has invaded many countries throughout the world. Pesticides are currently the favored control methods, but as a consequence of their frequent use, often disrupt Integrated Pest Management. Biological control with egg parasitoids is seen as the most promising control method over the long-term. Knowledge of the reproductive biology under laboratory conditions of the most effective candidates (Trissolcus japonicus and Trissolcus mitsukurii) for optimizing production for field releases is strongly needed. Rearing of these egg parasitoids was tested by offering three different host supply regimes using new emerged females and aged, host-deprived females in different combinations. Results showed a mean progeny per female ranging from 80 to 85 specimens for T. japonicus and from 63 to 83 for T. mitsukurii. Sex ratios were strongly female biased in all combinations and emergence rates exceeded 94% overall. Cumulative curves showed that longer parasitization periods beyond 10–14 days (under the adopted rearing regimes) will not lead to a significantly increase in progeny production. However, ageing females accumulate eggs in their ovaries that can be quickly laid if a sufficient number of host eggs are supplied, thus optimizing host resources. Our data showed that offering H. halys egg masses to host-deprived female Trissolcus once a week for three weeks allowed its eggs to accumulate in the ovary, providing the greatest number of offspring within a three week span.

14 June 2011 in Biocontrol Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Kim A. HoelmerKim A. Hoelmer
Kim A. Hoelmer
AKAlan A. Kirk
Alan A. Kirk
CPCharles H. Pickett
Charles H. Pickett
KDKent M. Daane
Kent M. Daane
MJMarshall W. Johnson
Marshall W. Johnson
Olive fruit fly is a key pest of olive and consequently a serious threat to olive fruit and oil production throughout the Mediterranean region. With the establishment of Bactrocera oleae in California a decade ago, interest was renewed in classical (introduction) biological control of the pest. Here we discuss the prospects of identifying natural enemies of B. oleae in Africa and Asia that may help reduce B. oleae populations in California and elsewhere. Based on the current understanding of Bactrocera phylogenetics, early opinions that B. oleae originated in Africa or western Asia rather than the Mediterranean region or the Near East are taxonomically and ecologically supportable. Closely related to cultivated olive, the wild olive Olea europaea cuspidata is widely distributed in southern and eastern Africa, the Arabian Peninsula, and eastwards into Asia as far as southwestern China. Little is known regarding the biology and ecology of B. oleae in Africa and eastern Asia, especially in wild olives. While the diversity of parasitoids of B. oleae in the Mediterranean region is low and unspecialized, a diverse assemblage of parasitoids is known from B. oleae in Africa. Conversely, regions in Asia have remained largely unexplored for B. oleae and its natural enemies.

17 December 2008 in Biocontrol Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NMNolwazi Mkize
Nolwazi Mkize
Kim A. HoelmerKim A. Hoelmer
Kim A. Hoelmer
MVMartin Villet
Martin Villet
Fruits of wild olives, Olea europaea ssp. cuspidata (Wall. ex G. Don) Cif., were collected in the Eastern Cape, South Africa, during 2003–2005 to quantify levels of fruit-infesting pests and their parasitoids. Two species of Tephritidae, Bactrocera oleae (Rossi) and B. biguttula (Bezzi), were the most abundant insects recovered and were reared from most samples. Fruit infestation rates by the Bactrocera spp. were generally below 8% and over half of the infestations were under 1%. When parasitism occurred in samples with flies, levels ranged from 7 to 83%. Several species of opiine braconid wasps, Psyttalia concolor (Szépligeti), Psyttalia lounsburyi (Silvestri), and Utetes africanus (Szépligeti) and one braconine wasp, Bracon celer Szépligeti, were reared from fruits containing B. oleae and/or B. biguttula. Chalcidoid parasitoids and seed wasps included seven species of Eurytomidae (Eurytoma oleae, Eurytoma sp., and Sycophila sp.), Ormyridae (Ormyrus sp.), Torymidae (Megastigmus sp.), and Eupelmidae (Eupelmus afer and E. spermophilus). One species of moth, Palpita unionalis (Hübner) (Crambidae), was recovered in very low numbers and without parasitoids. The survey results indicate that fruit flies might not become economic pests of the nascent commercial olive industry in the Eastern Cape, and the small numbers present may be controlled to a considerable level by natural enemies.