The discovery of the fallopian tube epithelium as the origin of high-grade serous ovarian cancer has brought a new option for ovarian cancer prevention. The fallopian tubes have no known function after completion of childbearing and can be removed to reduce the lifetime risk of ovarian cancer. Although the lifetime risk in the general population does not justify preventive surgery in itself, salpingectomy can be performed during abdominal surgery for other indications, also known as an opportunistic salpingectomy. The popularity of opportunistic salpingectomy is increasing worldwide; however, the variation between gynecologists and hospitals in their advice on opportunistic salpingectomy occurs because of the remaining uncertainty of evidence. Therefore, whether a woman can make her own decision depends on the hospital or gynecologist she visits. We aimed to lower this practice variation by providing standardized and unbiased counseling material. We aimed to develop and test a patient decision aid for opportunistic salpingectomy in women undergoing pelvic gynecologic surgery to either retain the ovaries or opt for sterilization. We followed a systematic development process based on the International Patient Decision Aid Standards. Data were collected between June 2019 and June 2020, using both qualitative and quantitative methods. The development process that occurred in collaboration with patients and healthcare professionals was overseen by a multidisciplinary steering group and was divided into 4 phases: (1) assessment of decisional needs using individual telephone interviews and questionnaires; (2) development of content and format based on decisional needs, current literature, and guidelines; (3) alpha testing and the first revision round; and (4) alpha testing and the second revision round. An outline of the patient decision aid was developed on the basis of decisional needs, current literature, and guidelines. It became clear that the decision aid should consist of 2 separate paths: one with information specifically for salpingectomy in addition to abdominal surgery and one for salpingectomy as a sterilization method. Both paths contained information on the anatomy and function of ovaries and fallopian tubes, risk reduction of ovarian cancer, and potential benefits and risks of opportunistic salpingectomy. Moreover, the sterilization path contains information on various sterilization methods and risks of unwanted pregnancy. The patient decision aid was developed as an online tool that includes information chapters, a knowledge quiz, consideration statements, and a summary detailing the patient's preferences and considerations. Adjustments were made following alpha testing round 1. The improved patient decision aid was subjected to usability tests (alpha testing round 2), in which it scored an "excellent" in tests with patients and a "good" in tests with gynecologists. Furthermore, our patient decision aid met the requirements of 45 of 49 applicable items from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards criteria. In collaboration with patients and healthcare professionals, a patient decision aid was developed on opportunistic salpingectomy and salpingectomy as a sterilization method. Both patients and gynecologists believed it is a useful tool that supports patients in making an informed decision whether to undergo an opportunistic salpingectomy and supports the counseling process by gynecologists.

Steenbeek MP, et al. J Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Aug;30(1):e2. https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e2

We investigated signal transduction pathway (STP) activity in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC) in relation to progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We made use of signal transduction pathway activity analysis (STA analysis), a novel method to quantify functional STP activity. Activity of the following pathways was measured: androgen receptor (AR), estrogen receptor (ER), phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), Hedgehog (Hh), Notch, nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB), transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β), and Wnt. We selected HGSC samples from publicly available datasets of ovarian cancer tissue, and used repeated k-means clustering to identify pathway activity clusters. PFS and OS of the clusters were analyzed. We used a subset of publicly available dataset GSE9891 (n = 140), where repeated k-means clustering based on PI3K and NF-κB pathway activity in HGSC samples resulted in two stable clusters. The cluster with low PI3K and high NF-κB pathway activity (n = 72) had a more favorable prognosis for both PFS (p = 0.004) and OS (p = 0.001) compared to the high-PI3K and low-NF-κB pathway activity cluster (n = 68). The low PI3K and high NF-κB pathway activity of the favorable prognosis cluster may indicate a more active immune response, while the high PI3K and low NF-κB pathway activity of the unfavorable prognosis cluster may indicate high cell division.

What is the effect of salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy or hydrosalpinx at a young age on ovarian cancer risk compared to no salpingectomy for any reason? We found no significant reduction in ovarian cancer risk after salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy or hydrosalpinx. Salpingectomy may reduce ovarian cancer incidence, although the lag-time between intervention and therapeutic effect remains to be elucidated. This nationwide population-based database study uses the Dutch pathology database to identify all women who underwent salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy or hydrosalpinx between January 1990 and December 2012 and compared ovarian cancer incidence to a control group of women who had a benign dermal nevus removed, matched for age at the time and year of procedure. After selection and manual control of intervention and control group, ovarian cancer incidence was recorded. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CI for the development of ovarian cancer were calculated with Cox regression analyses, both unadjusted and adjusted for age. Subgroup analyses were performed to investigate lag-time between intervention and protective effect. In all, 18 961 women were included in the intervention group; 17 106 women had a unilateral salpingectomy and 1855 had a bilateral salpingectomy. The control group consisted of 23 686 women. With 14 ovarian cancer cases in the intervention group, the incidence rate (IR) of ovarian cancer was 5.4 (95% CI 3.1–8.9) per 100 000 person-years. In the control group, there were 24 ovarian cancer cases, resulting in an IR of 7.1 (95% CI 4.7–10.5) per 100 000 person-years (P = 0.34). The age-adjusted HR for ovarian cancer was 0.76 (95% CI 0.39–1.47) after salpingectomy. Unilateral salpingectomy resulted in an age-adjusted HR of 0.81 (95% CI 0.41–1.59) and bilateral salpingectomy resulted in an age-adjusted HR of 0.43 (95% CI 0.06–3.16) based on one case. None of our subgroup analysis for lag-time resulted in a significant difference in ovarian cancer incidence between intervention and control group. The difference in ovarian cancer incidence appeared largest in women with at least 8 years of follow-up (P = 0.08). Due to the young population, ovarian cancer incidence is low, even at the end of follow-up. Furthermore, due to the anonymous nature of the pathology registry, we were unable to adjust for confounding factors. Although results did not reach statistical significance, they add to the available data on ovarian cancer incidence after salpingectomy. Our subgroup analysis suggests there may be no benefit in the first years following salpingectomy. None. N/A.

High-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC), the most common subtype of ovarian cancer, has a high mortality rate. Although there are some factors associated with survival, such as stage of disease, there are remarkable differences in survival among women diagnosed with advanced stage disease. In this study, we investigate possible relations between survival and signal transduction pathway (STP) activity. We assessed the functional activity of the androgen receptor (AR), estrogen receptor (ER), phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K), Hedgehog (HH), transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) and canonical wingless-type MMTV integration site (Wnt) pathway in 85 primary tumor samples of patients with FIGO stage IIIC to IVB HGSC and disease-free survival (DFS) below 12 (n = 52) or over 24 months (n = 33). There were no significant differences in median pathway activity between patients with a short and long DFS. In univariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, ER pathway activity was related to a favorable DFS and overall survival (OS) in postmenopausal women (p = 0.033 and p = 0.041, respectively), but not in premenopausal women. We divided the postmenopausal group into subgroups based on ER pathway activity quartiles. Survival analysis revealed that postmenopausal women in the lowest ER quartile had a shorter DFS and OS (log-rank p = 0.006 and p < 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, we were able to form subgroups of patients based on an inverse relation between ER and PI3K pathway activity. In conclusion, in postmenopausal patients with advanced stage HGSC, a poorer survival outcome was associated with low functional ER pathway activity.

Purpose: Anti-estrogen therapy may be used as a palliative treatment option in high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSC). However, clinical implementation is limited as the use of estrogen receptor (ER) protein expression by immunohistochemistry remains insufficient in predicting therapy response. To determine the accuracy of ER protein expression as a marker for ER signaling pathway activity, we aimed to correlate ER protein expression to functional ER signaling pathway activity in HGSC. Methods: Immunohistochemical ER protein expression was visually scored using total percentages of stained tumor cells and histoscores. Subsequently, mRNA was extracted, and RT-qPCR analysis was performed. Functional ER pathway activity was assessed by a computational Bayesian model inferring ER signaling pathway activity from mRNA levels of ER-specific target genes. Results: Our analysis of 29 HGSCs shows that neither total percentage of ER protein expression, nor ER histoscores are significantly correlated to ER signaling pathway activity (respectively, p = 0.473 and p = 0.606). Classification of HGSC into three groups based on ER histoscores 0–100 (n = 6), 101–200 (n = 15) and 201–300 (n = 8) resulted in comparable mean ER signaling pathway activity among the groups (p = 0.356). Several samples in the higher ER histoscore groups had low ER signaling pathway activity, indicating that nuclear ER protein expression is not sufficient to describe transcriptional ER activation. Conclusion: Positive immunohistochemical ER staining is not always indicative of an active ER signaling pathway and is, therefore, a poor predictor of anti-estrogen response. Further research is needed to prove the predictive value of ER signaling pathway activity regarding anti-estrogen sensitivity in HGSC patients.