Indigenous populations around the world face disproportionately high rates of disease related to the environment and animals. One Health is a concept that has been used effectively to understand and address these health risks. One Health refers to the relationships and interdependencies between animal, human, and environmental health and is an emerging research field that aligns with indigenous views of health. To understand the applicability of One Health in indigenous communities, a critical review was undertaken to investigate evidence of One Health research in indigenous communities internationally, assess the strength of evidence, and understand what gaps are present. This review included the appraisal of twenty-four studies based in five regions: Canada, Africa, Australia, South America, and Central America. The review found that there is a need for studies of high strength, with rigorous methods, local leadership, and active involvement of indigenous viewpoints, to be undertaken in indigenous communities internationally that focus on One Health. It highlights the need to further consider indigenous viewpoints in research to reduce limitations, increase effectiveness of findings, consider appropriateness of recommendations, and benefit communities.

Pet domestic cat (Felis catus) populations are increasing all around the world, resulting in an increase in contact with humans and wildlife, potentially spreading zoonotic diseases and predating on wildlife. With the recently identified rise in cat populations in remote Indigenous communities in Australia, culturally appropriate cat population management strategies are required. A systematic review process was conducted to review the current global cat population management practices that are suitable for owned, free-roaming cat populations in these communities. Eight articles on in-situ field cat populations and five studies simulating computer modelled cat populations reported results of 66 population management interventions. Surgical Sterilisation (SS) was used in all socialised owned cat articles. The trap–neuter–release (TNR) method was used most frequently on unsocialised cats and gained the best results when the trap–remove (TR) method was used concurrently to adopt out unwanted social cats and euthanise ill or injured cats. The results of this review suggest that long-term TNR/SS programs supplemented with TR provide the current most ethically sound best practice, humane method of managing cat populations in remote Australian Indigenous communities. It is also recognised that no one plan will fit all, and that further research on the micro-level techniques used to deploy both TNR and TR needs to occur, and that culturally appropriate community consultation during all processes is vital in achieving a sustainable management program.

This study evaluated a community-driven animal health and management program in the remote community of Wadeye, Northern Territory. This evaluation used a pre-post design to assess changes in animal and human health outcomes over a 12-month period of program implementation, from June 2018 to June 2019. The evaluation assessed the program by comparing animal health outcomes before versus one year after program implementation and comparing human health outcomes before versus during the first 12 months of the program. Outcome measures included the desexing status of dogs and cats, body condition and hair score of dogs, and rates of people presenting to the health clinic for a dog bite. Animal health outcomes significantly improved after program implementation. From pre to post program, there was a 77% increase in the prevalence of good body condition score among dogs and a 9% increase in the prevalence of good hair score among dogs, and the prevalence of desexed dogs and cats more than doubled. There was no significant change in the number of people presenting to the health clinic for a dog bite. Consideration on how to further incorporate human and environmental health aspects into the program could be useful for future One Health programs.

Recent concerns have arisen in Australia regarding detections of the exotic bacteriumEhrlichia caniswhich has resulted in ehrlichiosis outbreaks. In Australia, it is spread by the tropical brown dog tickRhipicephalus linnaei, formerlyRhipicephalus sanguineussensu lato tropical lineage. Previously, the tick has been recorded in South Australia in the Coober Pedy and the Oodnadatta areas. This study, which includes historical specimens data held in historical Australian arthropod collections, along with 10 sampled remote communities, confirms the wide distribution range of this species within the State.E. caniswas detected by PCR in the ticks. The percentage of dogs hosting PCR‐positive ticks increased from 2.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.3 to 9.7) in November–December 2020 to 62.9% (95% CI: 44.9 to 78.5) end of February 2021, initially in two then in seven Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara lands communities in the far northern regions of South Australia. Our results suggest a rapid spread of the pathogen. No evidence ofE. caniswas found in nine regional communities. The extended tropical brown dog tick distribution indicates a greater area whereE. canismay occur and may require management to minimise the impacts of ehrlichiosis outbreaks. Without the implementation of effective detection and control programs, this extended distribution ofR. linnaeiis likely to result in the spread of the bacterium to other regions.

Many Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities face barriers in accessing animal healthcare and are exposed to disproportionate environmental health exposures leading to increased risk of disease. A One Health approach has been promoted to address public health risks and improve human, animal, and environmental health outcomes in communities. We undertook a pilot One Health study in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities in Queensland collecting animal, human, and environmental health data from 82 households. We performed a descriptive analysis and assessed the association between human and environmental health exposures and animal health outcomes. Most households were not crowded (82.9%) but did report a high level of environmental health concerns (86.6%). The majority of households owned cats and dogs (81.7%), with most animals assessed as healthy. There was no association between human and environmental health exposures and animal health outcomes. As most households experienced concerns regarding housing conditions, environmental health programs should prioritise improving household factors. There was also strong support for animal healthcare (including access to medicines and veterinarians, education programs and population management), indicating that a One Health approach is desired by communities.

Cutaneous larva migrans (CLM) is attributed to zoonotic infection with animal hookworm larvae penetrating the human skin, usually the feet and legs. There is, however, a broad range of differential diagnoses, with the implicated hookworm species usually remaining speculative. Single-dose ivermectin is the most recommended current therapy, with repeat ivermectin doses sometimes required. With the massive global expansion of macrocytic lactone use in both livestock and companion animals, ivermectin resistance is being increasingly described in both helminths and ectoparasites. A case of CLM involving the foot of a healthy 37-year-old is described, with the failure of two doses of ivermectin 15 mg (240 μg/kg) a week apart. This occurred in the context of a remote work environment in tropical Australia with both companion animals (dogs and cats) and wildlife exposed to antiparasitic agents including ivermectin. A combination regimen of multiple doses of albendazole and ivermectin was curative. Parasites with multidrug resistance being described from animals now include hookworms in dogs which are resistant to pyrantel, benzimidazoles such as mebendazole and ivermectin. For relapsed CLM we now recommend a combination of ivermectin and albendazole therapy. This report supports the critical role for a One Health/Planetary Health approach to surveillance and response for emerging zoonoses and antimicrobial resistance in human and animal pathogens. This requires support for systematic approaches to foster and normalize communications and collaborations between human and animal health professionals, environmental scientists and ecologists and First Nations scientists who are the holders of Indigenous knowledge.