Background. Molnupiravir (MOL) and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NIR) were recently approved for the early treatment of COVID-19, but real-life data on tolerability, safety, and adverse events (AEs) are still scarce. Methods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study including all patients who were prescribed MOL and NIR at the Infectious Diseases Unit of Padua University Hospital, between January and May 2022. Demographic, clinical, and safety variables were recorded. Results. We included 909 patients, 48.3% males and 95.2% vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. The median age was 73 (IQR: 62–82) years. MOL and NIR were prescribed in 407 (44.8%) and 502 (55.2%) patients, respectively. Overall, 124/909 (13.6%) patients experienced any AEs following antivirals intake: 98/124 (79%) patients reporting adverse events presented grade 1 AEs, 23/124 (18.5%) grade 2 AEs and 3 (2.5%) grade 3 AEs. Treatment discontinuation was recorded in 4.8% of patients. AEs were significantly higher in women, in patients treated with NIR compared to MOL and in people who were not vaccinated. Conclusions. In our real-life setting, AEs were higher than those reported by clinical trials, and were particularly associated with NIR use and with not being vaccinated. Further analyses are needed to better assess safety of oral antivirals and to define which patient’s profile may benefit most from MOL and NIR.

Background. A large increase in multi-drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, especially carbapenem-resistant strains, occurred during the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic, posing important challenges in its treatment. Cefiderocol appeared to be a good option for the treatment of Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CR-Ab), but to date, the guidelines and evidence available are conflicting. Methods. We retrospectively included a group of patients with CR-Ab infections (treated with colistin- or cefiderocol-based regimens) at Padua University Hospital (August 2020–July 2022) and assessed predictors of 30-day mortality, and differences in microbiological and clinical treatment. To evaluate the difference in outcomes, accounting for the imbalance in antibiotic treatment allocation, a propensity score weighting (PSW) approach was adopted. Results. We included 111 patients, 68% males, with a median age of 69 years (IQR: 59–78). The median duration of antibiotic treatment was 13 days (IQR:11–16). In total, 60 (54.1%) and 51 (45.9%) patients received cefiderocol- and colistin-based therapy, respectively. Notably, 53 (47.7%) patients had bloodstream infections, while 58 (52.3%) had pneumonia. Colistin was combined in 96.1%, 80.4%, and 5.8% of cases with tigecycline, meropenem, and fosfomycin, respectively. Cefiderocol was combined in 13.3%, 30%, and 18.3% of cases with fosfomycin, tigecycline, and meropenem, respectively. At the baseline, the two treatment groups significantly differed in age (patients treated with colistin were significantly older), the prevalence of diabetes and obesity (more frequent in the group treated with colistin), length of stay (longer in the group receiving cefiderocol), and type of infection (BSI were more frequent in the group receiving cefiderocol). The proportion of patients who developed acute kidney injury was significantly higher in the colistin group. By using PSW, no statistically significant differences emerged for mortality or clinical and microbiological cure between the two groups. No independent predictors were detected for hospital mortality or clinical cure, while for the length of stay, the only selected predictor was age, with a non-linear effect (p-value 0.025 for non-linearity) on the prolongation of hospital stay of 0.25 days (95% CI 0.10–0.39) at increasing ages (calculated over the IQR). Conclusions. Cefiderocol treatment did not differ in terms of main outcomes and safety profile from colistin-based regimens. More prospective studies with a larger number of patients are required to confirm our results.

SARS-CoV-2 can produce both severe clinical conditions and long-term sequelae, but data describing post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PACS) are lacking for people living with HIV (PLWH). We aimed at assessing the prevalence and factors associated with severe COVID-19 and PACS in our cohort. We included all unvaccinated adult PLWH on antiretroviral treatment and plasma HIV-RNA < 40 cp/mL since at least six months before SARS-CoV-2 infection at the Infectious and Tropical Diseases Unit of Padua (Italy), from 20 February 2020 to 31 March 2021. COVID-19 severity was defined by WHO criteria; PACS was defined as the persistence of symptoms or development of sequelae beyond four weeks from SARS-CoV-2 infection. Demographic and clinical variables were collected, and data were analyzed by non-parametric tests. 123 subjects meeting the inclusion criteria among 1800 (6.8%) PLWH in care at the Infectious and Tropical diseases Unit in Padua were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection/COVID-19 during the study period. The median age was 51 years (40–58), 79.7% were males, and 77.2% of Caucasian ethnicity. The median CD4+ T-cell count and length of HIV infection were 560 cells/mmc (444–780) and 11 years, respectively. Of the patients, 35.0% had asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, 48% developed mild COVID-19, 17.1% presented moderate or severe COVID-19 requiring hospitalization and 4.1% died. Polypharmacy was the single independent factor associated with severe COVID-19. As for PACS, among 75 patients who survived SARS-CoV-2 symptomatic infection, 20 (26.7%) reported PACS at a median follow-up of six months: asthenia (80.0%), shortness of breath (50.0%) and recurrent headache (25.0%) were the three most common complaints. Only the severity of the COVID-19 episode predicted PACS after adjusting for relevant demographic and clinical variables. In our study, PLWH with sustained viral suppression and good immunological response showed that the risk of hospital admission for COVID-19 was low, even though the severity of the disease was associated with high mortality. In addition, the likelihood of developing severe COVID-19 and PACS was mainly driven by similar risk factors to those faced by the general population, such as polypharmacy and the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Background: Since the beginning of SARS-CoV-2 outbreak, a large number of infections have been reported among healthcare workers (HCWs). The aim of this study was to investigate the occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among HCWs involved in the first management of infected patients and to describe the measures adopted to prevent the transmission in the hospital. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted between February 21 and April 16, 2020, in the Padua University Hospital (north-east Italy). The infection control policy adopted consisted of the following: the creation of the “Advanced Triage” area for the evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 cases, and the implementation of an integrated infection control surveillance system directed to all the healthcare personnel involved in the Advance Triage area. HCWs were regularly tested with nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2; body temperature and suggestive symptoms were evaluated at each duty. Demographic and clinical data of both patients and HCWs were collected and analyzed; HCWs’ personal protective equipment (PPE) consumption was also recorded. The efficiency of the control strategy among HCWs was evaluated identifying symptomatic infection (primary endpoint) and asymptomatic infection (secondary endpoint) with confirmed detection of SARS-CoV-2. Results: 7595 patients were evaluated in the Advanced Triage area: 5.2% resulted positive and 72.4% was symptomatic. The HCW team was composed of 60 members. A total of 361 nasopharyngeal swabs were performed on HCWs. All the swabs resulted negative and none of the HCWs reached the primary or the secondary endpoint. Conclusions: An integrated hospital infection control strategy, consisting of dedicated areas for infected patients, strict measures for PPE use and mass surveillance, is successful to prevent infection among HCWs.

Background: The introduction and evolution of antiretrovirals has changed the panorama of comorbidities in people living with HIV (PLWH) by reducing the risk of AIDS-defining cancers (ADC). By contrast, due to ageing and persistent inflammation, the prevalence and incidence of non-AIDS-defining cancers have significantly increased. Therefore, we aimed at describing cancer epidemiology in our cohort over 28 years. Methods: We retrospectively included all PLWH in our clinic who ever developed cancers, considering features of ADC and NADC, from January 1996 to March 2023. Demographic, clinical characteristics, and survival were analyzed, comparing three observation periods (1996–2003, 2004–2013, and 2014–2023). Results: A total of 289 PLWH developed 308 cancers over the study period; 77.9% were male, the mean age was 49.6 years (SD 12.2), and 57.4% PLWH developed NADC and 41.5% ADC. Kaposi (21.8%) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (20.1%) were the most frequent cancers. Age at the time of cancer diagnosis significantly increased over time (41.6 years in the first period vs. 54.4 years in the third period, p < 0.001). In the first period compared with the last, a simultaneous diagnosis of HIV infection and cancer occurred in a higher proportion of persons (42.7 vs. 15.3, p < 0.001). While viro-immunological control at cancer diagnosis significantly improved over time, the proportions of cancer progression/remission remained stable. Overall survival significantly increased, but this trend was not confirmed for ADC. Conclusions: The probability of survival for ADC did not decrease as significantly as the number of ADC diagnoses over time. By contrast, NADC dramatically increased, in line with epidemiological studies and other literature data. The changing patterns of malignancies from ADC to NADC underline the need for public health interventions and the fostering of screening programs aimed at the prevention and early detection of NADC in PLWH.

To date, therapeutic switches are performed to reduce and prevent toxicity, improve adherence, promote virological control, and save costs. Drug switches are a daily challenge in the management of people living with HIV (PLWH), especially in those with multiple comorbidities and on polypharmacy. The objectives of this prospective analysis were: (I) to evaluate the viro-immunological efficacy of BIC/FTC/TAF in a cohort of PLWH who switched to this regimen from any other previous, at the Infectious and Tropical Diseases Unit of the Padua University Hospital; (II) to assess the impact on body weight, lipids, and renal function parameters at week 48; and (III) to evaluate daily costs changes, adherence, and the rate and causes of discontinuation of the regimen. We included all adult PLWH who switched to BIC/FTC/TAF from 1 February 2020 to 31 October 2021. We collected demographic, clinical, and laboratory data at baseline and week 48 after the switch. In addition, the estimated cART-related cost changes over the follow-up period were calculated. Over the study period, 290 individuals who switched to BIC/FTC/TAF, 76.9% were males, with a median age of 52 years, and 94.8% had an undetectable baseline HIV viremia. After a median time of 35 days (IQR: 1–55), 41 (14.1%) individuals discontinued the regimen. Factors significantly associated with discontinuation were switching from dual regimens, and neurological disorders. At week 48, we detected a significant increase in body weight, BMI, CD4 T-cell count, and CD4/CD8 ratio, and a significant reduction in triglycerides and costs; all patients had undetectable HIV RNA. Our results showed that switching to BIC/FTC/TAF may favor slightly immunological recovery and cost saving (−4.2 EUR/day from baseline to week 48, equivalent to a mean saving of 1533 EUR/year/person). The reduction in triglycerides does not appear to be clinically relevant, even if statistically significant, nor do both the increase in body weight and BMI (+1 kg and +0.29 BMI, respectively) and the increase in CD4 T-cell count (+45 cells/mmc). Further studies are needed to confirm our results.