Kirsi Tirri

Prof. Dr. Kirsi Tirri

Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Helsinki, 00100 Helsinki, Finland
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

33Years (1994-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2011 in Developmental Psychology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DYDavid S. Yeager
David S. Yeager
KTKali H. Trzesniewski
Kali H. Trzesniewski
Kirsi TirriKirsi Tirri
Kirsi Tirri
PNPetri Nokelainen
Petri Nokelainen
CDCarol S. Dweck
Carol S. Dweck
Why do some adolescents respond to interpersonal conflicts vengefully, whereas others seek more positive solutions? Three studies investigated the role of implicit theories of personality in predicting violent or vengeful responses to peer conflicts among adolescents in Grades 9 and 10. They showed that a greater belief that traits are fixed (an entity theory) predicted a stronger desire for revenge after a variety of recalled peer conflicts (Study 1) and after a hypothetical conflict that specifically involved bullying (Study 2). Study 3 experimentally induced a belief in the potential for change (an incremental theory), which resulted in a reduced desire to seek revenge. This effect was mediated by changes in bad-person attributions about the perpetrators, feelings of shame and hatred, and the belief that vengeful ideation is an effective emotion-regulation strategy. Together, the findings illuminate the social-cognitive processes underlying reactions to conflict and suggest potential avenues for reducing violent retaliation in adolescents.

1 January 2019 in Teaching and Teacher Education
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
IRInkeri Rissanen
Inkeri Rissanen
Elina KuusistoElina Kuusisto
Elina Kuusisto
MTMoona Tuominen
Moona Tuominen
Kirsi TirriKirsi Tirri
Kirsi Tirri

10 September 2014 in Journal of Education for Teaching
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Kirsi TirriKirsi Tirri
Kirsi Tirri

1 March 1999 in Journal of Moral Education
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Kirsi TirriKirsi Tirri
Kirsi Tirri
This article discusses the importance of professional morality in teachers' everyday work at school. Different aspects of morality are explored in the framework of the ethos model identified by Fritz Oser. The empirical findings of the moral dilemmas identified by teachers and their solving strategies are explored using both qualitative and quantitative data-gathering methods. Special interest is shown in the principles in teachers' arguments justifying their actions. Teachers' reasoning in solving moral dilemmas is investigated with the help of field-invariant and field-dependent arguments. The best interest of a child is found to be the field-invariant argument behind teachers' thinking in all the categories of moral dilemmas. In general, teachers prefer single-handed decision-making in solving professional dilemmas. The solving strategies are shown be very case specific. In the cases of harassment, teaching criticism and gender issues the teachers are shown to adopt discursive strategies more than in the other situations presented.

1 July 2014 in Applied Developmental Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMatthew J. Bundick
Matthew J. Bundick
Kirsi TirriKirsi Tirri
Kirsi Tirri
With the growing interest in the development of purpose in youth, one important role that requires attention is the school teacher. The current article explores student perceptions of the role teachers can play in fostering purpose in their students in the mid- and late adolescent years, and the teacher competencies that facilitate purpose development. The present investigation posits and tests a structural model in which student perceptions of teacher support predicts youth purpose, mediated by student perceptions of teacher competencies; in turn, youth purpose predicts broader positive youth development. Two samples of demographically diverse young people ages 13–18 were surveyed in the United States (n = 381) and Finland (n = 336). Results showed support for the role of teachers in fostering purpose, and provided evidence for the hypothesized model with some cross-cultural differences. Implications of these findings for developing purpose in schools are discussed.

1 February 2002 in Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Kirsi TirriKirsi Tirri
Kirsi Tirri
JHJukka Husu
Jukka Husu
This paper discusses ethical dilemmas in early childhood education as identified by kindergarten and elementary school teachers ( n = 26). Ethical dilemmas are investigated in the theoretical framework of virtue epistemology. The moral stances of care and responsibility are identified as basic elements in teachers' professional morality. The empirical findings present conflicts between teachers and parents, collegial conflicts between teachers, and inter-institutional conflicts in the community. The method used in the study is a relational reading of teachers' narratives. Interpretative accounts are created to give room for both care and responsibility voices in teachers' written reports. The analysis of the data reveals that the ethical dilemmas in early childhood education are very relational and deal with competing interpretations of 'the best interest of the child'. Teachers have taken the moral stance of care by identifying the ethical conflict. However, the responsible professional action has been more difficult for them to accomplish. Most of the time, discussions have not produced the desired results. Ethical conflicts in teaching invite teachers to consider the moral relevance of each dilemma by taking the perspectives of the involved parties.