Katherine L. Grantz

Katherine L. Grantz

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2015 in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GLGermaine M. Buck Louis
Germaine M. Buck Louis
JGJagteshwar Grewal
Jagteshwar Grewal
PAPaul S. Albert
Paul S. Albert
ASAnthony Sciscione
Anthony Sciscione
DWDeborah A. Wing
Deborah A. Wing
KGKatherine L. Grantz
Katherine L. Grantz
Fetal growth is associated with long-term health yet no appropriate standards exist for the early identification of undergrown or overgrown fetuses. We sought to develop contemporary fetal growth standards for 4 self-identified US racial/ethnic groups. We recruited for prospective follow-up 2334 healthy women with low-risk, singleton pregnancies from 12 community and perinatal centers from July 2009 through January 2013. The cohort comprised: 614 (26%) non-Hispanic whites, 611 (26%) non-Hispanic blacks, 649 (28%) Hispanics, and 460 (20%) Asians. Women were screened at 8w0d to 13w6d for maternal health status associated with presumably normal fetal growth (aged 18-40 years; body mass index 19.0-29.9 kg/m(2); healthy lifestyles and living conditions; low-risk medical and obstetrical history); 92% of recruited women completed the protocol. Women were randomized among 4 ultrasonography schedules for longitudinal fetal measurement using the Voluson E8 (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI). In-person interviews and anthropometric assessments were conducted at each visit; medical records were abstracted. The fetuses of 1737 (74%) women continued to be low risk (uncomplicated pregnancy, absent anomalies) at birth, and their measurements were included in the standards. Racial/ethnic-specific fetal growth curves were estimated using linear mixed models with cubic splines. Estimated fetal weight (EFW) and biometric parameter percentiles (5th, 50th, 95th) were determined for each gestational week and comparisons made by race/ethnicity, with and without adjustment for maternal and sociodemographic factors. EFW differed significantly by race/ethnicity >20 weeks. Specifically at 39 weeks, the 5th, 50th, and 95th percentiles were 2790, 3505, and 4402 g for white; 2633, 3336, and 4226 g for Hispanic; 2621, 3270, and 4078 g for Asian; and 2622, 3260, and 4053 g for black women (adjusted global P < .001). For individual parameters, racial/ethnic differences by order of detection were: humerus and femur lengths (10 weeks), abdominal circumference (16 weeks), head circumference (21 weeks), and biparietal diameter (27 weeks). The study-derived standard based solely on the white group erroneously classifies as much as 15% of non-white fetuses as growth restricted (EFW <5th percentile). Significant differences in fetal growth were found among the 4 groups. Racial/ethnic-specific standards improve the precision in evaluating fetal growth.

1 July 2014 in Obstetrics & Gynecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KGKatherine L. Grantz
Katherine L. Grantz
VBVincenzo Berghella
Vincenzo Berghella
URUma M. Reddy
Uma M. Reddy
RSRajeshwari Sundaram
Rajeshwari Sundaram
ZLZhaohui Lu
Zhaohui Lu
MHMatthew K. Hoffman
Matthew K. Hoffman
OBJECTIVE: To assess neonatal and maternal outcomes when the second stage of labor was prolonged according to American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines. METHODS: Electronic medical record data from a retrospective cohort (2002–2008) from 12 U.S. clinical centers (19 hospitals), including 43,810 nulliparous and 59,605 multiparous singleton deliveries at 36 weeks of gestation or greater, vertex presentation, who reached 10-cm cervical dilation were analyzed. Prolonged second stage was defined as: nulliparous women with epidural greater than 3 hours and without greater than 2 hours and multiparous women with epidural greater than 2 hours and without greater than 1 hour. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared and adjusted odds ratios calculated controlling for maternal race, body mass index, insurance, and region. RESULTS: Prolonged second stage occurred in 9.9% and 13.9% of nulliparous and 3.1% and 5.9% of multiparous women with and without an epidural, respectively. Vaginal delivery rates with prolonged second stage compared with within guidelines were 79.9% compared with 97.9% and 87.0% compared with 99.4% for nulliparous women with and without epidural, respectively, and 88.7% compared with 99.7% and 96.2% compared with 99.9% for multiparous women with and without epidural, respectively (P<.001 for all comparisons). Prolonged second stage was associated with increased chorioamnionitis and third-degree or fourth-degree perineal lacerations. Neonatal morbidity with prolonged second stage included sepsis in nulliparous women (with epidural: 2.6% compared with 1.2% [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.60–2.70]; without epidural: 1.8% compared with 1.1% [adjusted OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.28–4.27]); asphyxia in nulliparous women with epidural (0.3% compared with 0.1% [adjusted OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.22–4.66]) and perinatal mortality without epidural (0.18% compared with 0.04% for nulliparous women [adjusted OR 5.92, 95% CI 1.43–24.51]); and 0.21% compared with 0.03% for multiparous women (adjusted OR 6.34, 95% CI 1.32–30.34). However, among the offspring of women with epidurals whose second stage was prolonged (3,533 nulliparous and 1,348 multiparous women), there were no cases of hypoxic–ischemic encephalopathy or perinatal death. CONCLUSIONS: Benefits of increased vaginal delivery should be weighed against potential small increases in maternal and neonatal risks with prolonged second stage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II

1 April 2016 in Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TKTetsuya Kawakita
Tetsuya Kawakita
KWKathy Wilson
Kathy Wilson
KGKatherine L. Grantz
Katherine L. Grantz
HLHelain J. Landy
Helain J. Landy
CHChun-Chih Huang
Chun-Chih Huang
VGVeronica Gomez-Lobo
Veronica Gomez-Lobo

1 February 2015 in Environmental Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CRCandace Robledo
Candace Robledo
PMPauline Mendola
Pauline Mendola
EYEdwina Yeung
Edwina Yeung
TMTuija Männistö
Tuija Männistö
RSRajeshwari Sundaram
Rajeshwari Sundaram
KGKatherine L. Grantz
Katherine L. Grantz

22 March 2017 in American Journal of Perinatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KGKatherine L. Grantz
Katherine L. Grantz
ESEdmond D. Shenassa
Edmond D. Shenassa
KDKatheryne L. Downes
Katheryne L. Downes
Objective Risk factors for placental abruption have changed, but there has not been an updated systematic review investigating outcomes. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and CINAHL for publications from January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2016. We reviewed English-language publications reporting estimated incidence and/or risk factors for maternal, labor, delivery, and perinatal outcomes associated with abruption. We excluded case studies, conference abstracts, and studies that lacked a referent/comparison group or did not clearly characterize placental abruption. Results A total of 123 studies were included. Abruption was associated with elevated risk of cesarean delivery, postpartum hemorrhage and transfusion, preterm birth, intrauterine growth restriction or low birth weight, perinatal mortality, and cerebral palsy. Additional maternal outcomes included relaparotomy, hysterectomy, sepsis, amniotic fluid embolism, venous thromboembolism, acute kidney injury, and maternal intensive care unit admission. Additional perinatal outcomes included acidosis, encephalopathy, severe respiratory disorders, necrotizing enterocolitis, acute kidney injury, need for resuscitation, chronic lung disease, infant death, and epilepsy. Conclusion Few studies examined outcomes beyond the initial birth period, but there is evidence that both mother and child are at risk of additional adverse outcomes. There was also considerable variation in, or absence of, the reporting of abruption definitions.

8 September 2017 in International Journal of Epidemiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JGJagteshwar Grewal
Jagteshwar Grewal
KGKatherine L. Grantz
Katherine L. Grantz
Cuilin ZhangCuilin Zhang
Cuilin Zhang
ASAnthony Sciscione
Anthony Sciscione
DWDeborah A Wing
Deborah A Wing
GLGermaine M Buck Louis
Germaine M Buck Louis
Optimal fetal growth is a foundation for long-term health, whereas abnormal growth affects disease risk across the lifespan. Both fetal growth restriction and overgrowth are associated with increased fetal, infant and child mortality and morbidity, 1, 2 as well as being factors in reproductive disorders and later-onset diseases. Population-level data suggest a relationship between diminished birth size and chronic disorders, including hypertension, 3, 4 supporting the early origins of health and disease research paradigm. 5