Saeid Janizadeh

Dr. Saeid Janizadeh


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
31 October 2020 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBShahab S. Band
Shahab S. Band
SJSaeid Janizadeh
Saeid Janizadeh
SPSubodh Chandra Pal
Subodh Chandra Pal
ASAsish Saha
Asish Saha
Rabin ChakraborttyRabin Chakrabortty
Rabin Chakrabortty
Amir MosaviAmir Mosavi
Amir Mosavi
Flash flooding is considered one of the most dynamic natural disasters for which measures need to be taken to minimize economic damages, adverse effects, and consequences by mapping flood susceptibility. Identifying areas prone to flash flooding is a crucial step in flash flood hazard management. In the present study, the Kalvan watershed in Markazi Province, Iran, was chosen to evaluate the flash flood susceptibility modeling. Thus, to detect flash flood-prone zones in this study area, five machine learning (ML) algorithms were tested. These included boosted regression tree (BRT), random forest (RF), parallel random forest (PRF), regularized random forest (RRF), and extremely randomized trees (ERT). Fifteen climatic and geo-environmental variables were used as inputs of the flash flood susceptibility models. The results showed that ERT was the most optimal model with an area under curve (AUC) value of 0.82. The rest of the models’ AUC values, i.e., RRF, PRF, RF, and BRT, were 0.80, 0.79, 0.78, and 0.75, respectively. In the ERT model, the areal coverage for very high to moderate flash flood susceptible area was 582.56 km2 (28.33%), and the rest of the portion was associated with very low to low susceptibility zones. It is concluded that topographical and hydrological parameters, e.g., altitude, slope, rainfall, and the river’s distance, were the most effective parameters. The results of this study will play a vital role in the planning and implementation of flood mitigation strategies in the region.

10 November 2020 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BKB Kalantar
B Kalantar
Naonori UedaNaonori Ueda
Naonori Ueda
MIMohammed O. Idrees
Mohammed O. Idrees
SJSaeid Janizadeh
Saeid Janizadeh
Kourosh AhmadiKourosh Ahmadi
Kourosh Ahmadi
Farzin ShabaniFarzin Shabani
Farzin Shabani
This study predicts forest fire susceptibility in Chaloos Rood watershed in Iran using three machine learning (ML) models—multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), support vector machine (SVM), and boosted regression tree (BRT). The study utilizes 14 set of fire predictors derived from vegetation indices, climatic variables, environmental factors, and topographical features. To assess the suitability of the models and estimating the variance and bias of estimation, the training dataset obtained from the Natural Resources Directorate of Mazandaran province was subjected to resampling using cross validation (CV), bootstrap, and optimism bootstrap techniques. Using variance inflation factor (VIF), weight indicating the strength of the spatial relationship of the predictors to fire occurrence was assigned to each contributing variable. Subsequently, the models were trained and validated using the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) curve. Results of the model validation based on the resampling techniques (non, 5- and 10-fold CV, bootstrap and optimism bootstrap) produced AUC values of 0.78, 0.88, 0.90, 0.86 and 0.83 for the MARS model; 0.82, 0.82, 0.89, 0.87, 0.84 for the SVM and 0.87, 0.90, 0.90, 0.90, 0.91 for the BRT model. Across the individual model, the 10-fold CV performed best in MARS and SVM with AUC values of 0.90 and 0.89. Overall, the BRT outperformed the other models in all ramification with highest AUC value of 0.91 using optimism bootstrap resampling algorithm. Generally, the resampling process enhanced the prediction performance of all the models.

30 September 2020 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBShahab S. Band
Shahab S. Band
SJSaeid Janizadeh
Saeid Janizadeh
SPSubodh Chandra Pal
Subodh Chandra Pal
ASAsish Saha
Asish Saha
Rabin ChakraborttyRabin Chakrabortty
Rabin Chakrabortty
Amir MosaviAmir Mosavi
Amir Mosavi
This study aims to evaluate a new approach in modeling gully erosion susceptibility (GES) based on a deep learning neural network (DLNN) model and an ensemble particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm with DLNN (PSO-DLNN), comparing these approaches with common artificial neural network (ANN) and support vector machine (SVM) models in Shirahan watershed, Iran. For this purpose, 13 independent variables affecting GES in the study area, namely, altitude, slope, aspect, plan curvature, profile curvature, drainage density, distance from a river, land use, soil, lithology, rainfall, stream power index (SPI), and topographic wetness index (TWI), were prepared. A total of 132 gully erosion locations were identified during field visits. To implement the proposed model, the dataset was divided into the two categories of training (70%) and testing (30%). The results indicate that the area under the curve (AUC) value from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) considering the testing datasets of PSO-DLNN is 0.89, which indicates superb accuracy. The rest of the models are associated with optimal accuracy and have similar results to the PSO-DLNN model; the AUC values from ROC of DLNN, SVM, and ANN for the testing datasets are 0.87, 0.85, and 0.84, respectively. The efficiency of the proposed model in terms of prediction of GES was increased. Therefore, it can be concluded that the DLNN model and its ensemble with the PSO algorithm can be used as a novel and practical method to predict gully erosion susceptibility, which can help planners and managers to manage and reduce the risk of this phenomenon.

5 October 2019 in Water
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Mohammadtaghi avandMohammadtaghi avand
Mohammadtaghi avand
SJSaeid Janizadeh
Saeid Janizadeh
Amir NaghibiAmir Naghibi
Amir Naghibi
Hamid Reza PourghasemiHamid Reza Pourghasemi
Hamid Reza Pourghasemi
SBSaeid Khosrobeigi Bozchaloei
Saeid Khosrobeigi Bozchaloei
Thomas BlaschkeThomas Blaschke
Thomas Blaschke
This research was conducted to determine which areas in the Robat Turk watershed in Iran are sensitive to gully erosion, and to define the relationship between gully erosion and geo-environmental factors by two data mining techniques, namely, Random Forest (RF) and k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN). First, 242 gully locations we determined in field surveys and mapped in ArcGIS software. Then, twelve gully-related conditioning factors were selected. Our results showed that, for both the RF and KNN models, altitude, distance to roads, and distance from the river had the highest influence upon gully erosion sensitivity. We assessed the gully erosion susceptibility maps using the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. Validation results showed that the RF and KNN models had Area Under the Curve (AUC) 87.4 and 80.9%, respectively. As a result, the RF method has better performance compared with the KNN method for mapping gully erosion susceptibility. Rainfall, altitude, and distance from a river were identified as the most important factors affecting gully erosion in this area. The methodology used in this research is transferable to other regions to determine which areas are prone to gully erosion and to explicitly delineate high-risk zones within these areas.

2 August 2020 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XLXinxiang Lei
Xinxiang Lei
Wei ChenWei Chen
Wei Chen
Mohammadtaghi avandMohammadtaghi avand
Mohammadtaghi avand
SJSaeid Janizadeh
Saeid Janizadeh
NKNarges Kariminejad
Narges Kariminejad
Amir MosaviAmir Mosavi
Amir Mosavi
In the present study, gully erosion susceptibility was evaluated for the area of the Robat Turk Watershed in Iran. The assessment of gully erosion susceptibility was performed using four state-of-the-art data mining techniques: random forest (RF), credal decision trees (CDTree), kernel logistic regression (KLR), and best-first decision tree (BFTree). To the best of our knowledge, the KLR and CDTree algorithms have been rarely applied to gully erosion modeling. In the first step, from the 242 gully erosion locations that were identified, 70% (170 gullies) were selected as the training dataset, and the other 30% (72 gullies) were considered for the result validation process. In the next step, twelve gully erosion conditioning factors, including topographic, geomorphological, environmental, and hydrologic factors, were selected to estimate gully erosion susceptibility. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was used to estimate the performance of the models. The results revealed that the RF model had the best performance (AUC = 0.893), followed by the KLR (AUC = 0.825), the CDTree (AUC = 0.808), and the BFTree (AUC = 0.789) models. Overall, the RF model performed significantly better than the others, which may support the application of this method to a transferable susceptibility model in other areas. Therefore, we suggest using the RF, KLR, and CDT models for gully erosion susceptibility mapping in other prone areas to assess their reproducibility.

1 October 2021 in Journal of Cleaner Production
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAsish Saha
Asish Saha
SPSubodh Chandra Pal
Subodh Chandra Pal
MSM. Santosh
M. Santosh
SJSaeid Janizadeh
Saeid Janizadeh
ICIndrajit Chowdhuri
Indrajit Chowdhuri
RCRabin Chakrabortty
Rabin Chakrabortty