Hojat Karami

Dr. Hojat Karami


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
20 November 2020 in Water Resources Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MAMahdi Valikhan Anaraki
Mahdi Valikhan Anaraki
Saeed FarzinSaeed Farzin
Saeed Farzin
Sayed Farhad MousaviSayed Farhad Mousavi
Sayed Farhad Mousavi
HKHojat Karami
Hojat Karami

1 April 2019 in Journal of Hydrology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AAArmin Azad
Armin Azad
MMMehran Manoochehri
Mehran Manoochehri
HKHamed Kashi
Hamed Kashi
Saeed FarzinSaeed Farzin
Saeed Farzin
HKHojat Karami
Hojat Karami
Jalal ShiriJalal Shiri
Jalal Shiri

8 February 2018 in Journal of Hydroinformatics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MEMohammad Ehteram
Mohammad Ehteram
SMSayed Farhad Mousavi
Sayed Farhad Mousavi
HKHojat Karami
Hojat Karami
SFSaeed Farzin
Saeed Farzin
VSVijay P. Singh
Vijay P. Singh
Ahmed ElshafieAhmed Elshafie
Ahmed Elshafie
This study investigated reservoir operation under climate change for a base period (1981–2000) and future period (2011–2030). Different climate change models, based on A2 scenario, were used and the HAD-CM3 model, considering uncertainty, among other climate change models was found to be the best model. For the Dez basin in Iran, considered as a case study, the climate change models predicted increasing temperature from 1.16 to 2.5°C and decreasing precipitation for the future period. Also, runoff volume for the basin would decrease and irrigation demand for the downstream consumption would increase for the future period. A hybrid framework (optimization-climate change) was used for reservoir operation and the bat algorithm was used for minimization of irrigation deficit. A genetic algorithm and a particle swarm algorithm were selected for comparison with the bat algorithm. The reliability, resiliency, and vulnerability indices, based on a multi-criteria model, were used to select the base method for reservoir operation. Results showed the volume of water to be released for the future period, based on all evolutionary algorithms used, was less than for the base period, and the bat algorithm with high-reliability index and low vulnerability index performed better among other evolutionary algorithms.

1 January 2019 in Neural Computing and Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ZYZaher Mundher Yaseen
Zaher Mundher Yaseen
MFMohammad Falah
Mohammad Falah
HKHojat Karami
Hojat Karami
Mohammad EhteramMohammad Ehteram
Mohammad Ehteram
Saeed FarzinSaeed Farzin
Saeed Farzin
Ahmed ElshafieAhmed Elshafie
Ahmed Elshafie

1 January 2021 in Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SBShahab S. Band
Shahab S. Band
Essam HeggyEssam Heggy
Essam Heggy
Sayed M. BateniSayed M. Bateni
Sayed M. Bateni
HKHojat Karami
Hojat Karami
MRMobina Rabiee
Mobina Rabiee
Amir MosaviAmir Mosavi
Amir Mosavi
Utilizing new approaches to accurately predict groundwater level (GWL) in arid regions is of vital importance. In this study, support vector regression (SVR), Gaussian process regression (GPR), and their combination with wavelet transformation (named wavelet-support vector regression (W-SVR) and wavelet-Gaussian process regression (W-GPR)) are used to forecast groundwater level in Semnan plain (arid area) for the next month. Three different wavelet transformations, namely Haar, db4, and Symlet, are tested. Four statistical metrics, namely root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), coefficient of determination (R2), and Nah-Sutcliffe efficiency (NS), are used to evaluate performance of different methods. The results reveal that SVR with RMSE of 0.04790 (m), MAPE of 0.00199%, R2 of 0.99995, and NS of 0.99988 significantly outperforms GPR with RMSE of 0.55439 (m), MAPE of 0.04363%, R2 of 0.99264, and NS of 0.98413. Besides, the hybrid W-GPR-1 model (i.e. GPR with Harr wavelet) remarkably improves the accuracy of GWL prediction compared to GPR. Finally, the hybrid W-SVR-3 model (i.e. SVR with Symlet) provides the best GWL prediction with RMSE, MAPE, R2, and NS of 0.01290 (m), 0.00079%, 0.99999, and 0.99999, respectively. Overall, the findings indicate that hybrid models can accurately predict GWL in arid regions.

4 October 2016 in Neural Computing and Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HKHojat Karami
Hojat Karami
SKSohrab Karimi
Sohrab Karimi
HBHossein Bonakdari
Hossein Bonakdari
SSShahabodin Shamshirband
Shahabodin Shamshirband