Kingsley Nnaemeka Ogbu

Kingsley Nnaemeka Ogbu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

6Years (2021-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2021 in Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NHNina Rholan Hounguè
Nina Rholan Hounguè
KOKingsley Nnaemeka Ogbu
Kingsley Nnaemeka Ogbu
AAAdrian Delos Santos Almoradie
Adrian Delos Santos Almoradie
MEMariele Evers
Mariele Evers

2 September 2022 in Hydrology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KOKingsley Nnaemeka Ogbu
Kingsley Nnaemeka Ogbu
OROldrich Rakovec
Oldrich Rakovec
PSPallav Shrestha
Pallav Shrestha
LSLuis Samaniego
Luis Samaniego
Bernhard TischbeinBernhard Tischbein
Bernhard Tischbein
HMHadush Meresa
Hadush Meresa
Hydrologic modeling in Nigeria is plagued by non-existent or paucity of hydro-metrological/morphological records, which has detrimental impacts on sustainable water resource management and agricultural production. Nowadays, freely accessible remotely sensed products are used as inputs in hydrologic modeling, especially in regions with deficient observed records. Therefore, it is appropriate to utilize the fine-resolution spatial coverage offered by these products in a parameter regionalization method that supports sub-grid variability. This study assessed the transferability of optimized model parameters from a gauged to an ungauged basin using the mesoscale Hydrologic Model (mHM)—Multiscale Parameter Regionalization (MPR) technique. The ability of the fifth generation European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Reanalysis product (ERA5), Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station data (CHIRPS), Global Precipitation Climatology Centre (GPCC), and Multi-Source Weighted-Ensemble Precipitation (MSWEP) gridded rainfall products to simulate observed discharge in three basins was first assessed. Thereafter, the CHIRPS rainfall product was used in three multi-basin mHM setups. Optimized model parameters were then transferred to independent basins, and the reproduction of observed discharges was assessed. Kling–Gupta Efficiency (KGE) scores showed improvements when mHM runs were performed using optimized parameters in comparison to using default parameters for discharge simulations. Optimized mHM runs performed reasonably (KGE > 0.4) for all basins and rainfall products. However, only one basin showed a satisfactory KGE value (KGE = 0.54) when optimized parameters were transferred to an ungauged basin. This study underscores the utility of the mHM-MPR tool for parameter transferability during discharge simulation in data-scarce regions.