Jeffrey S. Stein

Dr. Jeffrey S. Stein

Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Roanoke, VA; Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24016, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 December 2017 in Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JSJeffrey S. Stein
Jeffrey S. Stein
ATAllison N. Tegge
Allison N. Tegge
JTJamie K. Turner
Jamie K. Turner
WBWarren K. Bickel
Warren K. Bickel

22 April 2021 in Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LALiqa N. Athamneh
Liqa N. Athamneh
JBJeremiah Brown
Jeremiah Brown
JSJeffrey S. Stein
Jeffrey S. Stein
KGKirstin M. Gatchalian
Kirstin M. Gatchalian
SLStephen M. LaConte
Stephen M. LaConte
WBWarren K. Bickel
Warren K. Bickel
Reinforcer Pathology theory proposes that expanding the temporal window of reinforcement (i.e., reducing delay discounting) using episodic future thinking (EFT) would decrease alcohol consumption. However, evidence of effectiveness in real-world settings is lacking. Using a randomized proof-of-concept field trial, the current study examined the effect of expanding the temporal window of reinforcement, using remotely delivered EFT, on decreasing real-world alcohol consumption among individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD). Fifty-two individuals (9 females) aged 18–65 years who met the DSM-5 criteria for moderate or severe AUD and aimed to drink in moderation or abstain from drinking completed the study and were included in analysis. EFT significantly (p = .031) reduced alcohol consumption (mean change of consumption pre-post intervention = −2.18 drinks/day) compared to control episodic recent thinking (ERT; mean change of −0.52 drinks/day). Changes in discounting rates pre-post intervention significantly predicted changes in alcohol consumption (coef. = .424, 95% CI: .043-.813, p = .030) even after controlling for age, gender, race, income, education, marital status, and family history of addiction. Overall satisfaction across groups was rated as 3.92 on a 1 to 5-point scale, suggesting that the current remote approach is feasible and acceptable. The current findings were congruent with the theory, Reinforcer Pathology, that EFT expands the temporal window and decreases alcohol consumption, and the remote approach was considered feasible and acceptable. We believe the present study contributes new knowledge with tangible benefits for scientifically understanding and better defining novel interventions that may be clinically deployed to improve treatment outcomes.

28 September 2020 in Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JSJeffrey S. Stein
Jeffrey S. Stein
WCWilliam H. Craft
William H. Craft
RPRocco A. Paluch
Rocco A. Paluch
KGKirstin M. Gatchalian
Kirstin M. Gatchalian
MGMark H. Greenawald
Mark H. Greenawald
WBWarren K. Bickel
Warren K. Bickel

3 November 2022 in Frontiers in Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JBJeremiah Michael Brown
Jeremiah Michael Brown
JSJeffrey S. Stein
Jeffrey S. Stein
In recent years, episodic future thinking (EFT) has emerged as a promising behavioral intervention to reduce delay discounting or maladaptive health behaviors; however, considerable methodological heterogeneity in methods for eliciting engagement in EFT has been observed in prior research. In this narrative review, we briefly describe methods for generating EFT cues, the content of EFT cues, common control conditions for experiments utilizing EFT, and considerations for cue delivery and implementation. Where possible, we make suggestions for current best practices in each category while identifying gaps in knowledge and potential areas of future research. Finally, we conclude by using the NIH Stage model to better frame the current state of the literature on EFT and propose gaps to be addressed if EFT is to be both an efficacious and effective behavioral intervention.

1 October 2018 in Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJeffrey S. Stein
Jeffrey S. Stein
BHBryan W. Heckman
Bryan W. Heckman
DPDerek A. Pope
Derek A. Pope
EPElan S. Perry
Elan S. Perry
GFGeoffrey T. Fong
Geoffrey T. Fong
WBWarren K. Bickel
Warren K. Bickel

2 July 2016 in Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
WBWarren K. Bickel
Warren K. Bickel
AMAlexandra M. Mellis
Alexandra M. Mellis
SSSarah E. Snider
Sarah E. Snider
LMLara Moody
Lara Moody
JSJeffrey S. Stein
Jeffrey S. Stein
AQAmanda J. Quisenberry
Amanda J. Quisenberry