Marco Binotti

Dr. Marco Binotti

Department of Energy, Politecnico di Milano, Via Lambruschini 4, 20156 Milan, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2018 in Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
COCarlos Ortíz
Carlos Ortíz
MRM.C. Romano
M.C. Romano
JVJ.M. Valverde
J.M. Valverde
MBMarco Binotti
Marco Binotti
FSFundación Investigación de Sevilla
Fundación Investigación de Sevilla

1 October 2017 in Applied Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MBMarco Binotti
Marco Binotti
MAMarco Astolfi
Marco Astolfi
SCStefano Campanari
Stefano Campanari
GMGiampaolo Manzolini
Giampaolo Manzolini
PSPaolo Silva
Paolo Silva

1 May 2012 in Solar Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AGAndrea Giostri
Andrea Giostri
MBMarco Binotti
Marco Binotti
Marco AstolfiMarco Astolfi
Marco Astolfi
PSPaolo Silva
Paolo Silva
EMEnnio Macchi
Ennio Macchi
Giampaolo ManzoliniGiampaolo Manzolini
Giampaolo Manzolini

25 February 2018 in Processes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GMGioele Di Marcoberardino
Gioele Di Marcoberardino
DVDario Vitali
Dario Vitali
FSFrancesco Spinelli
Francesco Spinelli
MBMarco Binotti
Marco Binotti
Giampaolo ManzoliniGiampaolo Manzolini
Giampaolo Manzolini
This paper discusses the techno-economic assessment of hydrogen production from biogas with conventional systems. The work is part of the European project BIONICO, whose purpose is to develop and test a membrane reactor (MR) for hydrogen production from biogas. Within the BIONICO project, steam reforming (SR) and autothermal reforming (ATR), have been identified as well-known technologies for hydrogen production from biogas. Two biogases were examined: one produced by landfill and the other one by anaerobic digester. The purification unit required in the conventional plants has been studied and modeled in detail, using Aspen Adsorption. A pressure swing adsorption system (PSA) with two and four beds and a vacuum PSA (VPSA) made of four beds are compared. VPSA operates at sub-atmospheric pressure, thus increasing the recovery: results of the simulations show that the performances strongly depend on the design choices and on the gas feeding the purification unit. The best purity and recovery values were obtained with the VPSA system, which achieves a recovery between 50% and 60% at a vacuum pressure of 0.1 bar and a hydrogen purity of 99.999%. The SR and ATR plants were designed in Aspen Plus, integrating the studied VPSA model, and analyzing the behavior of the systems at the variation of the pressure and the type of input biogas. The SR system achieves a maximum efficiency, calculated on the LHV, of 52% at 12 bar, while the ATR of 28% at 18 bar. The economic analysis determined a hydrogen production cost of around 5 €/kg of hydrogen for the SR case.

1 August 2021 in Applied Thermal Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DADario Alfani
Dario Alfani
MBMarco Binotti
Marco Binotti
EMEnnio Macchi
Ennio Macchi
PSPaolo Silva
Paolo Silva
MAMarco Astolfi
Marco Astolfi

1 March 2018 in Solar Energy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SPSimone Polimeni
Simone Polimeni
MBMarco Binotti
Marco Binotti
LMLuca Moretti
Luca Moretti
GMGiampaolo Manzolini
Giampaolo Manzolini