Giuseppe Giglia

Dr. Giuseppe Giglia

Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics (BIND), Section of Human Physiology University of Palermo.
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 March 2010 in Experimental Brain Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BFBrigida Fierro
Brigida Fierro
MTMarina De Tommaso
Marina De Tommaso
FGFrancesca Giglia
Francesca Giglia
Giuseppe GigliaGiuseppe Giglia
Giuseppe Giglia
APAntonio Palermo
Antonio Palermo
Filippo BrighinaFilippo Brighina
Filippo Brighina

25 September 2008 in Experimental Brain Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Filippo BrighinaFilippo Brighina
Filippo Brighina
MRM. Romano
M. Romano
Giuseppe GigliaGiuseppe Giglia
Giuseppe Giglia
VSV. Saia
V. Saia
APA. Puma
A. Puma
BFB. Fierro
B. Fierro

25 February 2011 in The Journal of Headache and Pain
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Filippo BrighinaFilippo Brighina
Filippo Brighina
MTMarina De Tommaso
Marina De Tommaso
FGFrancesca Giglia
Francesca Giglia
SSSimona Scalia
Simona Scalia
GCGiuseppe Cosentino
Giuseppe Cosentino
BFBrigida Fierro
Brigida Fierro
Evidence by functional imaging studies suggests the role of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in the inhibitory control of nociceptive transmission system. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is able to modulate pain response to capsaicin. In the present study, we evaluated the effect of DLPFC activation (through rTMS) on nociceptive control in a model of capsaicin-induced pain. The study was performed on healthy subjects that underwent capsaicin application on right or left hand. Subjects judged the pain induced by capsaicin through a 0–100 VAS scale before and after 5 Hz rTMS over left and right DLPFC at 10 or 20 min after capsaicin application in two separate groups (8 subjects each). Left DLPFC-rTMS delivered either at 10 and 20 min after capsaicin application significantly decreased spontaneous pain in both hands. Right DLPFC rTMS showed no significant effect on pain measures. According to these results, stimulation of left DLPFC seems able to exert a bilateral control on pain system, supporting the critical antinociceptive role of such area. This could open new perspectives to non-invasive brain stimulation protocols of alternative target area for pain treatment.

18 August 2006 in Experimental Brain Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BFBrigida Fierro
Brigida Fierro
Giuseppe GigliaGiuseppe Giglia
Giuseppe Giglia
APAntonio Palermo
Antonio Palermo
CPCarla Pecoraro
Carla Pecoraro
SSSimona Scalia
Simona Scalia
Filippo BrighinaFilippo Brighina
Filippo Brighina

1 June 2014 in Pain
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GCGiuseppe Cosentino
Giuseppe Cosentino
BFBrigida Fierro
Brigida Fierro
SVSimone Vigneri
Simone Vigneri
STSimona Talamanca
Simona Talamanca
PPPiera Paladino
Piera Paladino
Filippo BrighinaFilippo Brighina
Filippo Brighina
The primary brain dysfunctions leading to the onset of a migraine attack remain largely unknown. Other important open questions concern the mechanisms of initiation, continuation, and termination of migraine pain, and the changes in brain function underlying migraine transformation. Brief trains of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), when applied to the primary motor cortex at suprathreshold intensity (⩾120% of resting motor threshold [RMT]), elicit in healthy subjects a progressive, glutamate-dependent facilitation of the motor evoked potentials (MEP). Conversely, in conditions of increased cortical excitability, the rTMS trains induce inhibitory MEP responses likely mediated by cortical homeostatic mechanisms. We enrolled 66 migraine-without-aura patients, 48 migraine-with-aura patients, 14 patients affected by chronic migraine (CM), and 20 healthy controls. We assessed motor cortical response to 5-Hz rTMS trains of 10 stimuli given at 120% RMT. Patients with episodic migraine were studied in different phases of the migraine cycle: interictal, preictal, ictal, and postictal states. Results showed a facilitatory MEP response during the trains in patients evaluated in the preictal phase, whereas inhibitory responses were observed during and after a migraine attack, as well as in CM patients. In the interictal phase, different responses were observed, depending on attack frequency: facilitation in patients with low and inhibition in those with high attack recurrence. Our findings suggest that changes in cortical excitability and fluctuations in the threshold for inhibitory metaplasticity underlie the migraine attack recurrence, and could be involved in the process of migraine transformation.

12 October 2004 in Experimental Brain Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Filippo BrighinaFilippo Brighina
Filippo Brighina
Giuseppe GigliaGiuseppe Giglia
Giuseppe Giglia
SSSimona Scalia
Simona Scalia
MFMargherita Francolini
Margherita Francolini
APAntonio Palermo
Antonio Palermo
BFBrigida Fierro
Brigida Fierro