Objective: To evaluate the clinical usefulness of serum autoantibody profiling in patients with autoimmune myositis. Methods: We retrospectively studied 74 consecutive patients: 68 had definite or probable myositis according to Bohan–Peter criteria, six suffered from antisynthetase syndrome with subclinical myopathy. Myositis specific antibodies (MSA) (anti-ARS, -SRP, -Mi-2) were determined by RNA immunoprecipitation or immunoblot, myositis associated antibodies (MAA) (anti-RoRNP, -U1RNP, -PM/Scl, -Ku) by immunoblot. Results: Forty-three patients (58%) were positive for MSA: anti-Jo-1 in 15/27 polymyositis (PM) (55%), 4/33 dermatomyositis (DM) (12%), 1/8 overlap (12%) and 2/6 antisynthetase syndrome (33%); anti-ARS non-Jo-1 in 1/27 PM (4%), 2/33 DM (6%) and 4/6 antisynthetase syndrome (67%); anti-Mi-2 in 1/27 PM (4%) and 11/33 DM (33%); anti-SRP in 3/27 PM (11%) and 1/33 DM (3%). One patient was anti-Jo-1/Mi-2 positive, one anti-Jo-1/SRP positive. Moreover, 27 patients (36%) were positive for MAA: anti-Ro/SSA in 8/27 PM (30%), 7/33 DM (21%), 1/8 overlap (12%), and 3/6 antisynthetase syndrome (50%); anti-U1RNP in 1/27 PM (3.7%), 1/33 DM (3%), and 2/8 overlap (25%); anti-PM/Scl in 2/8 overlap (25%), anti-Ku in 2/8 overlap (25%). Anti-Jo-1 was predominantly associated with PM, anti-Mi-2 was almost exclusively found in DM patients. Anti-ARS antibodies were closely associated with interstitial lung disease and polyarthritis; notably, anti-ARS non-Jo-1 was more frequent in patients without overt muscle alterations. Anti-Ro/SSA antibody was not associated with any disease subset, but significantly more frequent in antisynthetase syndrome. Conclusions: Searching for MSA and MAA in patients with autoimmmune myositis is recommended because of its diagnostic and clinical value. Anti-ARS non-Jo-1 antibodies seem to preferentially target patients with pulmonary fibrosis without overt myopathy.

Melkersson–Rosenthal syndrome (MRS) is a rare, neuro-mucocutaneous disease which presents as orofacial swelling, facial palsy and fissured tongue. These symptoms may occur simultaneously or, more frequently, with a oligosymptomatic or monosymptomatic pattern. Swelling, that is the most common initial finding, may mimic hereditary or acquired angioedema, a disorder caused by histamine or bradykinin-mediated plasma-leakage affecting subcutaneous and/or submucosal tissue. The differential diagnosis of MRS includes also chronic inflammatory and infective diseases characterized by granulomatous infiltration, as well as rosacea, contact dermatitis, allergic reactions and Bell’s palsy. A 71-year old, non-allergic female patient with no familial and personal history of angioedema presented, a few days after a possible herpes simplex or varicella-zoster virus infection, with monolateral facial paraesthesia and lower lip edema. After temporary remission of symptoms on oral steroids and antihistamines, she showed swelling recurrence refractory to valaciclovir therapy and a subsequent course of antihistamines. The clinical picture and a previous history of non-Hodgkin lymphoma prompted us to rule out an acquired form of paraneoplastic, C1-inhibitor (C1-INH) deficiency: C1q and both antigen and functional C1-INH tested normal, whilst we found low plasma levels of C3 and C4 possibly related to the parallel detection of antiphospholipid antibodies. Thus, we hypothesized a non-histaminergic, idiopathic form of angioedema and planned further therapy with tranexamic acid and the leukotriene receptor antagonist montelukast. Treatment failure with both drugs finally suggested a Melkersson–Rosenthal syndrome, which was confirmed by histologic findings of non caseating granulomas on lip biopsy. Melkersson–Rosenthal syndrome may occur with rather non-specific symptoms and overlap with alternative conditions, including recurrent angioedema. No specific biomarkers for MRS exist and clinical diagnosis is often of exclusion. The finding of complement or immune alterations, as in our patient, may be further confounding and justify the need for skin or mucosal biopsy to establish a correct diagnosis and prescribe targeted therapy.

PF4 is a megakaryocyte-derived cationic chemokine that plays a part in innate immunity through its activity on the macrophages. In bacterial sepsis, PF4 binds to glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) on the surface of aerobic bacteria, giving rise to an antigenic complex that induces the early formation of anti-PF4 IgG-IgA-IgM. This triggers the immune response in patients receiving heparin therapy who develop heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). These antibodies have also been identified in patients with chronic Gram-negative infections. Given the complexity of this innate immune response network, our study on 45 patients with sepsis focused on the immune response mediated by platelet PF4. We analyzed the role of IgG-IgA-IgM against PF4-GAGs, and the presence of specific PF4-bearing platelet microparticles (PMPs). Anti-GAGs/PF4 IgG-IgA-IgM levels were significantly higher in septic patients than in control groups (healthy controls or acute patients without sepsis, p < 0.001). PF4-bearing PMP levels were only significantly higher in septic patients (p < 0.001). The occurrence of IgG-IgA-IgM against PF4-GAGs and PF4+ PMPs correlated with an improvement in patients’ sepsis. In conclusion, we demonstrated that, in the course of bacterial sepsis, platelet activation leads to the formation of specific PF4-bearing PMPs. These specific microparticles bind to polyanionic sequences on the surface of aerobic bacteria, giving rise to an antigenic complex that induces the early formation of IgG-IgA-IgM against PF4-GAGs as an innate immune response to infection.