Véronique Azuara

Dr. Véronique Azuara

Epigenetics and Development Group, Stem Cell Biology, Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, W12 ONN London, UK

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 March 2006 in Nature Cell Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
VAVéronique Azuara
Véronique Azuara
PPPascale Perry
Pascale Perry
SSStephan Sauer
Stephan Sauer
MSMikhail Spivakov
Mikhail Spivakov
HJHelle F. Jørgensen
Helle F. Jørgensen
AFAmanda G. Fisher
Amanda G. Fisher

20 August 2009 in Genes & Development
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ABAna Banito
Ana Banito
SRSheikh T. Rashid
Sheikh T. Rashid
JAJuan Carlos Acosta
Juan Carlos Acosta
SLSiDe Li
SiDe Li
CPCarlos F. Pereira
Carlos F. Pereira
JGJesús Gil
Jesús Gil
Somatic cells can be reprogrammed into induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells by overexpressing combinations of factors such as Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc. Reprogramming is slow and stochastic, suggesting the existence of barriers limiting its efficiency. Here we identify senescence as one such barrier. Expression of the four reprogramming factors triggers senescence by up-regulating p53, p16INK4a, and p21CIP1. Induction of DNA damage response and chromatin remodeling of the INK4a/ARF locus are two of the mechanisms behind senescence induction. Crucially, ablation of different senescence effectors improves the efficiency of reprogramming, suggesting novel strategies for maximizing the generation of iPS cells.

1 January 2006 in Journal of Cell Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RWRuth R. E. Williams
Ruth R. E. Williams
VAVéronique Azuara
Véronique Azuara
PPPascale Perry
Pascale Perry
SSStephan Sauer
Stephan Sauer
MDMaria Dvorkina
Maria Dvorkina
AFAmanda G. Fisher
Amanda G. Fisher
Determining how genes are epigenetically regulated to ensure their correct spatial and temporal expression during development is key to our understanding of cell lineage commitment. Here we examined epigenetic changes at an important proneural regulator gene Mash1 (Ascl1), as embryonic stem (ES) cells commit to the neural lineage. In ES cells where the Mash1 gene is transcriptionally repressed, the locus replicated late in S phase and was preferentially positioned at the nuclear periphery with other late-replicating genes (Neurod, Sprr2a). This peripheral location was coupled with low levels of histone H3K9 acetylation at the Mash1 promoter and enhanced H3K27 methylation but surprisingly location was not affected by removal of the Ezh2/Eed HMTase complex or several other chromatin-silencing candidates (G9a, SuV39h-1, Dnmt-1, Dnmt-3a and Dnmt-3b). Upon neural induction however, Mash1 transcription was upregulated (>100-fold), switched its time of replication from late to early in S phase and relocated towards the interior of the nucleus. This spatial repositioning was selective for neural commitment because Mash1 was peripheral in ES-derived mesoderm and other non-neural cell types. A bidirectional analysis of replication timing across a 2 Mb region flanking the Mash1 locus showed that chromatin changes were focused at Mash1. These results suggest that Mash1 is regulated by changes in chromatin structure and location and implicate the nuclear periphery as an important environment for maintaining the undifferentiated state of ES cells.

1 January 2012 in Cell Stem Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AOAna O'LOghlen
Ana O'LOghlen
AMAna M. Muñoz-Cabello
Ana M. Muñoz-Cabello
AGAlexandre Gaspar-Maia
Alexandre Gaspar-Maia
HWHsan-Au Wu
Hsan-Au Wu
ABAna Banito
Ana Banito
JGJesus Gil
Jesus Gil
The Polycomb Group (PcG) of chromatin modifiers regulates pluripotency and differentiation. Mammalian genomes encode multiple homologs of the Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) components, including five orthologs of the Drosophila Polycomb protein (Cbx2, Cbx4, Cbx6, Cbx7, and Cbx8). We have identified Cbx7 as the primary Polycomb ortholog of PRC1 complexes in embryonic stem cells (ESCs). The expression of Cbx7 is downregulated during ESC differentiation, preceding the upregulation of Cbx2, Cbx4, and Cbx8, which are directly repressed by Cbx7. Ectopic expression of Cbx7 inhibits differentiation and X chromosome inactivation and enhances ESC self-renewal. Conversely, Cbx7 knockdown induces differentiation and derepresses lineage-specific markers. In a functional screen, we identified the miR-125 and miR-181 families as regulators of Cbx7 that are induced during ESC differentiation. Ectopic expression of these miRNAs accelerates ESC differentiation via regulation of Cbx7. These observations establish a critical role for Cbx7 and its regulatory miRNAs in determining pluripotency.

1 September 2001 in Nature Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Jane A. SkokJane A. Skok
Jane A. Skok
KBKaren E. Brown
Karen E. Brown
VAVéronique Azuara
Véronique Azuara
MCMarie-Laure Caparros
Marie-Laure Caparros
JBJonathan Baxter
Jonathan Baxter
AFAmanda G. Fisher
Amanda G. Fisher

1 April 2007 in Journal of Biological Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LLLaura Lande-Diner
Laura Lande-Diner
JZJianmin Zhang
Jianmin Zhang
IBIttai Ben-Porath
Ittai Ben-Porath
NANinette Amariglio
Ninette Amariglio
IKIlana Keshet
Ilana Keshet
HCHoward Cedar
Howard Cedar
A large fraction of the animal genome is maintained in a transcriptionally repressed state throughout development. By generating viable Dnmt1-/- mouse cells we have been able to study the effect of DNA methylation on both gene expression and chromatin structure. Our results confirm that the underlying methylation pattern has a profound effect on histone acetylation and is the major effector of me-H3(K4) in the animal genome. We demonstrate that many methylated genes are subject to additional repression mechanisms that also impact on histone acetylation, and the data suggest that late replication timing may play an important role in this process.