Diabetes mellitus (DM) is considered a marker of poor prognosis after cardiac surgery. We sought to investigate the effect of DM on clinical outcomes and quality of life (QoL) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). A total of 148 consecutive patients with symptomatic, severe aortic stenosis who underwent TAVI were included. Baseline characteristics, procedural and long-term clinical outcomes, and the results of frailty and QoL assessment with EQ-5D-3L questionnaire were compared between patients with and without DM. DM was present in 48 of 148 (32.4%) patients. No differences in periprocedural risk (Logistic Euroscore and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) scale) between groups were observed. There were no differences in 30-day and 12-month all-cause mortality between groups [DM(-) vs. DM(+): 7 (7.0%) vs. 5 (10.4%), p = 0.53 and 12 (12.0%) vs. 10 (20.8%), p = 0.16, respectively]. No influence of DM presence on the risk of death was confirmed after adjustment for age and gender (for 30-day mortality, age/gender-adjusted OR 1.55, 95%CI 0.47-5.17; for 12-month mortality, age/gender-adjusted OR 2.05, 95%CI 0.79-5.32). Similarly, at the longest available follow-up, mortality did not differ between groups [14 (29.2%) vs. 19 (19.0%), p = 0.16; age/gender-adjusted OR 1.81, 95%CI 0.80-4.08]. Similar rates of other complications after TAVI were noted. Frailty measured with the 5-meter walking test was more frequently reported in patients with DM [11 (22.9%) vs. 10 (10.0%), p = 0.035]. No differences in QoL parameters at baseline and 12 months were noted. Patients with DM undergoing TAVI demonstrated similar mortality, complication rates, and QoL outcomes compared to patients without DM.

The study aimed to assess procedural complications, patient flow and clinical outcomes after balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) as rescue or bridge therapy, based on data from our registry. A total of 382 BAVs in 374 patients was performed. The main primary indication for BAV was a bridge for TAVI (n = 185, 49.4%). Other indications included a bridge for AVR (n = 26, 6.9%) and rescue procedure in hemodynamically unstable patients (n = 139, 37.2%). The mortality rate at 30 days, 6 and 12 months was 10.4%, 21.6%, 28.3%, respectively. In rescue patients, the death rate raised to 66.9% at 12 months. A significant improvement in symptoms was confirmed after BAV, after 30 days, 6 months, and in survivors after 1 year (p < 0.05 for all). Independent predictors of 12-month mortality were baseline STS score [HR (95% CI) 1.42 (1.34 to 2.88), p < 0.0001], baseline LVEF <20% [HR (95% CI) 1.89 (1.55–2.83), p < 0.0001] and LVEF <30% at 1 month [HR (95% CI) 1.97 (1.62–3.67), p < 0.0001] adjusted for age/gender. In everyday clinical practice in the TAVI era, there are still clinical indications to BAV a standalone procedure as a bridge to surgery, TAVI or for urgent high risk non-cardiac surgical procedures. Patients may improve clinically after BAV with LV function recovery, allowing to perform final therapy, within limited time window, for severe AS which ameliorates long-term outcomes. On the other hand, in patients for whom an isolated BAV becomes a destination therapy, prognosis is extremely poor.

Background: Rapid ventricular pacing is mandatory for optimal balloon positioning during aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) in patients with severe aortic stenosis. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of direct left ventricular (LV) guidewire pacing in comparison with regular pacing induced by temporary pacemaker (PM) placement in the right ventricle. Methods: Direct rapid LV pacing was provided with a 0.035″ guidewire. Baseline clinical characteristics, echocardiographic and procedural data, as well as complication rates, were compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 202 patients undergoing BAV were enrolled (49.5% with direct LV guidewire pacing). The pacing success rate was 100%. In the direct LV guidewire pacing group, we found a lower radiation dose, shorter fluoroscopy and overall procedural time (0.16 vs. 0.28 Gy, p = 0.02; 5.4 vs. 10.3 min, p = 0.01; 17 vs. 25 min, p = 0.01; respectively). In addition, the complication rate was lower in that group (cardiac tamponades, vascular access site complications, blood transfusions rate, and in-hospital mortality: 0% vs. 3.9%; 4.0% vs. 15.7%; 2.0% vs. 12.7%; 2.0% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.01 for all, respectively). Conclusions: Direct rapid LV guidewire pacing is a simple, safe and effective option for BAV with a reduced complication rate compared to a temporary PM placed in the right ventricle.

Achievement of maximal hyperemia is mandatory for an accurate calculation of fractional flow reserve (FFR) and it is obtained with adenosine given either as an intravenous infusion or as an intracoronary bolus. The purpose of this study was to compare the infusion of adenosine with intracoronary adenosine bolus dose escalation in the optimal assessment of peak FFR. We enrolled consecutive patients with borderline coronary lesions that were assessed by FFR with the use of adenosine intracoronary boluses (100, 200, 400 and 600 µg) and intravenous infusion of 140 µg/kg/min and 280 µg/kg/min. FFR values were assessed and compared. Fifty patients with 125 borderline coronary artery stenoses were enrolled. Physiological severity assessed with: intravenous adenosine infusion at 140 µg/kg/min was mean 0.82 ± 0.09; infusion at 280 µg/kg/min - 0.81 ± 0.09; intracoronary bolus of 100 µg, 200 µg, 400 µg and 600 µg - 0.83 ± 0.09; 0.83 ± 0.09, 0.83 ± 0.09; and 0.83 ± 0.09, respectively. There was a strong linear correlation between FFR values obtained from 140 µg/kg/min infusion and adenosine intracoronary 100, 200, 400 and 600 µg bolus injection (r = 0.989, r = 0.99, r = 0.993, r = 0.994, respectively, p < 0.001 for all). FFR values achieved with intracoronary boluses of adenosine are very similar, but not identical to those obtained using intravenous adenosine administration. The values of FFR may vary between escalating doses of intracoronary boluses and intravenous infusion.

Background: Post-implantation paravalvular leak (PVL) remains a significant complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). More importantly, its occurrence may impact long-term mortality. Aim: We sought to evaluate the effects of balloon post-dilatation (PD) on the reduction of PVL and mortality in patients undergoing TAVI. Methods: A total of 101 consecutive patients undergoing TAVI were enrolled. Angiography, echocardiography, and the aortic regurgitation index (ARI) were used to assess the severity of PVL before and after balloon PD. Patients were divided into two groups based whether or not PD after TAVI was performed. Reduction of PVL, change of ARI, and clinical outcomes were assessed. Results: Balloon post-dilatation was performed in 23 (22.8%) patients. In 95.6%, PVL reduction was successful (no or mild PVL). PD increased the ARI from 23.4% (22.4–24.0) to 27.1% (26.1–28.3); p < 0.001. Thirty-day mortality rate was 14.1% in the PD (–) group vs. 0.0% in the PD (+) group; p = 0.07. One-year mortality (21.8% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.97) and procedural stroke rate (7.7% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.99) were not different between the groups. Conclusions: Balloon post-dilatation may be a safe and effective technique to reduce moderate to severe PVL after TAVI. Background: Post-implantation paravalvular leak (PVL) remains a significant complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). More importantly, its occurrence may impact long-term mortality. Aim: We sought to evaluate the effects of balloon post-dilatation (PD) on the reduction of PVL and mortality in patients undergoing TAVI. Methods: A total of 101 consecutive patients undergoing TAVI were enrolled. Angiography, echocardiography, and the aortic regurgitation index (ARI) were used to assess the severity of PVL before and after balloon PD. Patients were divided into two groups based whether or not PD after TAVI was performed. Reduction of PVL, change of ARI, and clinical outcomes were assessed. Results: Balloon post-dilatation was performed in 23 (22.8%) patients. In 95.6%, PVL reduction was successful (no or mild PVL). PD increased the ARI from 23.4% (22.4–24.0) to 27.1% (26.1–28.3); p < 0.001. Thirty-day mortality rate was 14.1% in the PD (–) group vs. 0.0% in the PD (+) group; p = 0.07. One-year mortality (21.8% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.97) and procedural stroke rate (7.7% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.99) were not different between the groups. Conclusions: Balloon post-dilatation may be a safe and effective technique to reduce moderate to severe PVL after TAVI.